Cargando…

Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Reducing inequalities is one of the priorities of the National Health Service. However, there is no standard system for monitoring inequalities in the care provided by acute trusts. We explore the feasibility of monitoring inequalities within an acute trust using routine data. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langford, Katharine M, Bottle, Alex, Aylin, Paul P, Ward, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-104
_version_ 1782250321684201472
author Langford, Katharine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul P
Ward, Helen
author_facet Langford, Katharine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul P
Ward, Helen
author_sort Langford, Katharine M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing inequalities is one of the priorities of the National Health Service. However, there is no standard system for monitoring inequalities in the care provided by acute trusts. We explore the feasibility of monitoring inequalities within an acute trust using routine data. METHODS: A retrospective study of hospital episode statistics from one acute trust in London over three years (2007 to 2010). Waiting times, length of stay and readmission rates were described for seven common surgical procedures. Inequalities by age, sex, ethnicity and social deprivation were examined using multiple logistic regression, adjusting for the other socio-demographic variables and comorbidities. Sample size calculations were computed to estimate how many years of data would be ideal for this analysis. RESULTS: This study found that even in a large acute trust, there was not enough power to detect differences between subgroups. There was little evidence of inequalities for the outcome and process measures examined, statistically significant differences by age, sex, ethnicity or deprivation were only found in 11 out of 80 analyses. Bariatric surgery patients who were black African or Caribbean were more likely than white patients to experience a prolonged wait (longer than 64 days, aOR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.36-4.49). Following a coronary angioplasty, patients from more deprived areas were more likely to have had a prolonged length of stay (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.25-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study found difficulties in using routine data to identify inequalities on a trust level. Little evidence of inequalities in waiting time, length of stay or readmission rates by sex, ethnicity or social deprivation were identified although some differences were identified which warrant further investigation. Even with three years of data from a large trust there was little power to detect inequalities by procedure. Data will therefore need to be pooled from multiple trusts to detect inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35023562012-11-21 Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study Langford, Katharine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul P Ward, Helen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing inequalities is one of the priorities of the National Health Service. However, there is no standard system for monitoring inequalities in the care provided by acute trusts. We explore the feasibility of monitoring inequalities within an acute trust using routine data. METHODS: A retrospective study of hospital episode statistics from one acute trust in London over three years (2007 to 2010). Waiting times, length of stay and readmission rates were described for seven common surgical procedures. Inequalities by age, sex, ethnicity and social deprivation were examined using multiple logistic regression, adjusting for the other socio-demographic variables and comorbidities. Sample size calculations were computed to estimate how many years of data would be ideal for this analysis. RESULTS: This study found that even in a large acute trust, there was not enough power to detect differences between subgroups. There was little evidence of inequalities for the outcome and process measures examined, statistically significant differences by age, sex, ethnicity or deprivation were only found in 11 out of 80 analyses. Bariatric surgery patients who were black African or Caribbean were more likely than white patients to experience a prolonged wait (longer than 64 days, aOR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.36-4.49). Following a coronary angioplasty, patients from more deprived areas were more likely to have had a prolonged length of stay (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.25-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: This study found difficulties in using routine data to identify inequalities on a trust level. Little evidence of inequalities in waiting time, length of stay or readmission rates by sex, ethnicity or social deprivation were identified although some differences were identified which warrant further investigation. Even with three years of data from a large trust there was little power to detect inequalities by procedure. Data will therefore need to be pooled from multiple trusts to detect inequalities. BioMed Central 2012-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3502356/ /pubmed/22537019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-104 Text en Copyright ©2012 Langford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Langford, Katharine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul P
Ward, Helen
Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title_full Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title_short Using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
title_sort using routine data to monitor inequalities in an acute trust: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-104
work_keys_str_mv AT langfordkatharinem usingroutinedatatomonitorinequalitiesinanacutetrustaretrospectivestudy
AT bottlealex usingroutinedatatomonitorinequalitiesinanacutetrustaretrospectivestudy
AT aylinpaulp usingroutinedatatomonitorinequalitiesinanacutetrustaretrospectivestudy
AT wardhelen usingroutinedatatomonitorinequalitiesinanacutetrustaretrospectivestudy