Cargando…
A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) can provide accurate and reliable evidence, typically about the effectiveness of health interventions. Evidence is dynamic, and if SRs are out-of-date this information may not be useful; it may even be harmful. This study aimed to compare five statistical methods...
Autores principales: | Pattanittum, Porjai, Laopaiboon, Malinee, Moher, David, Lumbiganon, Pisake, Ngamjarus, Chetta |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048894 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Use of antenatal corticosteroids prior to preterm birth in four South East Asian countries within the SEA-ORCHID project
por: Pattanittum, Porjai, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Interventions to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Tin, Khaing Nwe, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Prognostic models for complete recovery in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Jampathong, Nampet, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Perioperative Complications of Hysterectomy After a Previous Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Rattanakanokchai, Siwanon, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Mode of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in preterm birth: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global and Multi-country Surveys
por: Thanh, Bao Yen Luong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)