Cargando…

The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment ques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidutz, Florian, Beirer, Marc, Braunstein, Volker, Bogner, Viktoria, Wiedemann, Ernst, Biberthaler, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-9
_version_ 1782250346381312000
author Schmidutz, Florian
Beirer, Marc
Braunstein, Volker
Bogner, Viktoria
Wiedemann, Ernst
Biberthaler, Peter
author_facet Schmidutz, Florian
Beirer, Marc
Braunstein, Volker
Bogner, Viktoria
Wiedemann, Ernst
Biberthaler, Peter
author_sort Schmidutz, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires. METHODS: A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35024702012-11-21 The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery Schmidutz, Florian Beirer, Marc Braunstein, Volker Bogner, Viktoria Wiedemann, Ernst Biberthaler, Peter Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires. METHODS: A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature. BioMed Central 2012-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3502470/ /pubmed/22607967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-9 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schmidutz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schmidutz, Florian
Beirer, Marc
Braunstein, Volker
Bogner, Viktoria
Wiedemann, Ernst
Biberthaler, Peter
The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title_full The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title_fullStr The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title_short The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
title_sort munich shoulder questionnaire (msq): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-9
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidutzflorian themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT beirermarc themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT braunsteinvolker themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT bognerviktoria themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT wiedemannernst themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT biberthalerpeter themunichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT schmidutzflorian munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT beirermarc munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT braunsteinvolker munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT bognerviktoria munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT wiedemannernst munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery
AT biberthalerpeter munichshoulderquestionnairemsqdevelopmentandvalidationofaneffectivepatientreportedtoolforoutcomemeasurementandpatientsafetyinshouldersurgery