Cargando…

Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show

Understanding of the psychology of tyranny is dominated by classic studies from the 1960s and 1970s: Milgram's research on obedience to authority and Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. Supporting popular notions of the banality of evil, this research has been taken to show that people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haslam, S. Alexander, Reicher, Stephen. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
_version_ 1782250355528040448
author Haslam, S. Alexander
Reicher, Stephen. D.
author_facet Haslam, S. Alexander
Reicher, Stephen. D.
author_sort Haslam, S. Alexander
collection PubMed
description Understanding of the psychology of tyranny is dominated by classic studies from the 1960s and 1970s: Milgram's research on obedience to authority and Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. Supporting popular notions of the banality of evil, this research has been taken to show that people conform passively and unthinkingly to both the instructions and the roles that authorities provide, however malevolent these may be. Recently, though, this consensus has been challenged by empirical work informed by social identity theorizing. This suggests that individuals' willingness to follow authorities is conditional on identification with the authority in question and an associated belief that the authority is right.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35025092012-11-26 Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show Haslam, S. Alexander Reicher, Stephen. D. PLoS Biol Essay Understanding of the psychology of tyranny is dominated by classic studies from the 1960s and 1970s: Milgram's research on obedience to authority and Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. Supporting popular notions of the banality of evil, this research has been taken to show that people conform passively and unthinkingly to both the instructions and the roles that authorities provide, however malevolent these may be. Recently, though, this consensus has been challenged by empirical work informed by social identity theorizing. This suggests that individuals' willingness to follow authorities is conditional on identification with the authority in question and an associated belief that the authority is right. Public Library of Science 2012-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3502509/ /pubmed/23185132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426 Text en © 2012 Haslam, Reicher http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Essay
Haslam, S. Alexander
Reicher, Stephen. D.
Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title_full Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title_fullStr Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title_full_unstemmed Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title_short Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show
title_sort contesting the “nature” of conformity: what milgram and zimbardo's studies really show
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
work_keys_str_mv AT haslamsalexander contestingthenatureofconformitywhatmilgramandzimbardosstudiesreallyshow
AT reicherstephend contestingthenatureofconformitywhatmilgramandzimbardosstudiesreallyshow