Cargando…
The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145 |
_version_ | 1782250407064502272 |
---|---|
author | Ajduković, Dea Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana Šekerija, Mario Hermanns, Norbert |
author_facet | Ajduković, Dea Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana Šekerija, Mario Hermanns, Norbert |
author_sort | Ajduković, Dea |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 diabetic patients. Positively screened patients were interviewed to assess the severity of depression, and those with subclinical symptoms were invited to treatment groups. The reach of screening procedure was evaluated by the total response rate, proportion of positive depression screenings, and proportion of eligible patients entering treatment programs. Predictors of responsiveness to screening and of participation in treatment were determined using logistic regression. Of the 34% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 1442), 40% reported depressive symptoms and a need for professional help (n = 581). Age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05–1.08), BMI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.04), HbA1C (OR = .92, 95% CI = .86–.99), and LDL-cholesterol (OR = .90, 95% CI = .81–1.00) correlated with response to screening. Willingness to accept treatment was predicted by professional status (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.53–6.87), education (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05–1.38), and BMI (OR = .91, 95% CI = .85–.98). Older patients with better diabetes control were more likely to be reached by postal screening for depressive symptoms. Professionally inactive, better-educated persons and those with lower BMI were more likely to participate in the intervention for subsyndromal depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3502847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35028472012-12-03 The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? Ajduković, Dea Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana Šekerija, Mario Hermanns, Norbert Int J Endocrinol Research Article This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 diabetic patients. Positively screened patients were interviewed to assess the severity of depression, and those with subclinical symptoms were invited to treatment groups. The reach of screening procedure was evaluated by the total response rate, proportion of positive depression screenings, and proportion of eligible patients entering treatment programs. Predictors of responsiveness to screening and of participation in treatment were determined using logistic regression. Of the 34% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 1442), 40% reported depressive symptoms and a need for professional help (n = 581). Age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05–1.08), BMI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.04), HbA1C (OR = .92, 95% CI = .86–.99), and LDL-cholesterol (OR = .90, 95% CI = .81–1.00) correlated with response to screening. Willingness to accept treatment was predicted by professional status (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.53–6.87), education (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05–1.38), and BMI (OR = .91, 95% CI = .85–.98). Older patients with better diabetes control were more likely to be reached by postal screening for depressive symptoms. Professionally inactive, better-educated persons and those with lower BMI were more likely to participate in the intervention for subsyndromal depression. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3502847/ /pubmed/23209461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145 Text en Copyright © 2012 Dea Ajduković et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ajduković, Dea Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana Šekerija, Mario Hermanns, Norbert The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title | The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title_full | The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title_fullStr | The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title_short | The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? |
title_sort | reach of depression screening preceding treatment: are there patterns of patients' self-selection? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajdukovicdea thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT pibernikokanovicmirjana thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT sekerijamario thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT hermannsnorbert thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT ajdukovicdea reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT pibernikokanovicmirjana reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT sekerijamario reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection AT hermannsnorbert reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection |