Cargando…

The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?

This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ajduković, Dea, Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana, Šekerija, Mario, Hermanns, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145
_version_ 1782250407064502272
author Ajduković, Dea
Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana
Šekerija, Mario
Hermanns, Norbert
author_facet Ajduković, Dea
Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana
Šekerija, Mario
Hermanns, Norbert
author_sort Ajduković, Dea
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 diabetic patients. Positively screened patients were interviewed to assess the severity of depression, and those with subclinical symptoms were invited to treatment groups. The reach of screening procedure was evaluated by the total response rate, proportion of positive depression screenings, and proportion of eligible patients entering treatment programs. Predictors of responsiveness to screening and of participation in treatment were determined using logistic regression. Of the 34% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 1442), 40% reported depressive symptoms and a need for professional help (n = 581). Age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05–1.08), BMI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.04), HbA1C (OR = .92, 95% CI = .86–.99), and LDL-cholesterol (OR = .90, 95% CI = .81–1.00) correlated with response to screening. Willingness to accept treatment was predicted by professional status (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.53–6.87), education (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05–1.38), and BMI (OR = .91, 95% CI = .85–.98). Older patients with better diabetes control were more likely to be reached by postal screening for depressive symptoms. Professionally inactive, better-educated persons and those with lower BMI were more likely to participate in the intervention for subsyndromal depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35028472012-12-03 The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection? Ajduković, Dea Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana Šekerija, Mario Hermanns, Norbert Int J Endocrinol Research Article This study evaluated the reach of depression screening followed by treatment programs for subsyndromal depression and explored demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were reached versus those who were not. A two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression was sent to 4196 type 2 diabetic patients. Positively screened patients were interviewed to assess the severity of depression, and those with subclinical symptoms were invited to treatment groups. The reach of screening procedure was evaluated by the total response rate, proportion of positive depression screenings, and proportion of eligible patients entering treatment programs. Predictors of responsiveness to screening and of participation in treatment were determined using logistic regression. Of the 34% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 1442), 40% reported depressive symptoms and a need for professional help (n = 581). Age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05–1.08), BMI (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.04), HbA1C (OR = .92, 95% CI = .86–.99), and LDL-cholesterol (OR = .90, 95% CI = .81–1.00) correlated with response to screening. Willingness to accept treatment was predicted by professional status (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.53–6.87), education (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05–1.38), and BMI (OR = .91, 95% CI = .85–.98). Older patients with better diabetes control were more likely to be reached by postal screening for depressive symptoms. Professionally inactive, better-educated persons and those with lower BMI were more likely to participate in the intervention for subsyndromal depression. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3502847/ /pubmed/23209461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145 Text en Copyright © 2012 Dea Ajduković et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ajduković, Dea
Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana
Šekerija, Mario
Hermanns, Norbert
The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title_full The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title_fullStr The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title_full_unstemmed The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title_short The Reach of Depression Screening Preceding Treatment: Are There Patterns of Patients' Self-Selection?
title_sort reach of depression screening preceding treatment: are there patterns of patients' self-selection?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23209461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148145
work_keys_str_mv AT ajdukovicdea thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT pibernikokanovicmirjana thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT sekerijamario thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT hermannsnorbert thereachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT ajdukovicdea reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT pibernikokanovicmirjana reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT sekerijamario reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection
AT hermannsnorbert reachofdepressionscreeningprecedingtreatmentaretherepatternsofpatientsselfselection