Cargando…
C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem?
Objective: The purpose of this comparison case study is to show a potential complication associated with atlantoaxial fusion, and the preoperative evaluation that could help to avoid it. Background data: The use of lateral mass screw fixation in atlantoaxial fusion has provided surgeons the ability...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298601 |
_version_ | 1782250452489863168 |
---|---|
author | Myers, Kurt D. Lindley, Emily M. Burger, Evalina L. Patel, Vikas V. |
author_facet | Myers, Kurt D. Lindley, Emily M. Burger, Evalina L. Patel, Vikas V. |
author_sort | Myers, Kurt D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The purpose of this comparison case study is to show a potential complication associated with atlantoaxial fusion, and the preoperative evaluation that could help to avoid it. Background data: The use of lateral mass screw fixation in atlantoaxial fusion has provided surgeons the ability to create rigid fixation, with a high success rate of fusion. While the use of screws for fixation is relatively easy to adopt, the risk of causing neurological damage to the patient is ever present. Many major structures, such as the vertebral artery, carotid artery, and spinal cord, must all be considered during surgery. Methods: A comparison of two patients who underwent the same procedure was reviewed—the first had no complications from surgery and the second underwent revision surgery because of the C1 screw impinging on the C1 nerve exiting the foramen. Results: After removal of the C1 screw and converting to a cable technique, the patient made a full recovery and neurological function was restored. Conclusions: When considering C1-C2 lateral mass screw fixation for atlantoaxial fusion, the size of the foramen should be considered. If the foramen is significantly narrowed, alternate fixation should be selected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3503508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35035082012-12-12 C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? Myers, Kurt D. Lindley, Emily M. Burger, Evalina L. Patel, Vikas V. Evid Based Spine Care J Article Objective: The purpose of this comparison case study is to show a potential complication associated with atlantoaxial fusion, and the preoperative evaluation that could help to avoid it. Background data: The use of lateral mass screw fixation in atlantoaxial fusion has provided surgeons the ability to create rigid fixation, with a high success rate of fusion. While the use of screws for fixation is relatively easy to adopt, the risk of causing neurological damage to the patient is ever present. Many major structures, such as the vertebral artery, carotid artery, and spinal cord, must all be considered during surgery. Methods: A comparison of two patients who underwent the same procedure was reviewed—the first had no complications from surgery and the second underwent revision surgery because of the C1 screw impinging on the C1 nerve exiting the foramen. Results: After removal of the C1 screw and converting to a cable technique, the patient made a full recovery and neurological function was restored. Conclusions: When considering C1-C2 lateral mass screw fixation for atlantoaxial fusion, the size of the foramen should be considered. If the foramen is significantly narrowed, alternate fixation should be selected. Thieme Medical Publishers 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3503508/ /pubmed/23236306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298601 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Myers, Kurt D. Lindley, Emily M. Burger, Evalina L. Patel, Vikas V. C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title | C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title_full | C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title_fullStr | C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title_full_unstemmed | C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title_short | C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
title_sort | c1-c2 fusion: postoperative c2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myerskurtd c1c2fusionpostoperativec2nerveimpingementisitaproblem AT lindleyemilym c1c2fusionpostoperativec2nerveimpingementisitaproblem AT burgerevalinal c1c2fusionpostoperativec2nerveimpingementisitaproblem AT patelvikasv c1c2fusionpostoperativec2nerveimpingementisitaproblem |