Cargando…
Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or mon...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596 |
_version_ | 1782250452724744192 |
---|---|
author | Agel, Julie Bransford, Richard |
author_facet | Agel, Julie Bransford, Richard |
author_sort | Agel, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or monitoring of follow-up. Method: Retrospective review of Health Outcomes Scoring database. Results: During an 18-month period 1,863 patients completed 3,124 SF-36v2 questionnaires. The extent of diagnoses and the uneven timing of follow-ups of the completed questionnaires render this data useless both to the patient and for aggregate analysis. Conclusion: There is no value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires to patient care or clinical research. [Table: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3503509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35035092012-12-12 Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? Agel, Julie Bransford, Richard Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or monitoring of follow-up. Method: Retrospective review of Health Outcomes Scoring database. Results: During an 18-month period 1,863 patients completed 3,124 SF-36v2 questionnaires. The extent of diagnoses and the uneven timing of follow-ups of the completed questionnaires render this data useless both to the patient and for aggregate analysis. Conclusion: There is no value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires to patient care or clinical research. [Table: see text] Thieme Medical Publishers 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3503509/ /pubmed/23236301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Agel, Julie Bransford, Richard Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title | Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title_full | Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title_fullStr | Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title_short | Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
title_sort | is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ageljulie istherevalueinroutineadministrationofoutcomequestionnaires AT bransfordrichard istherevalueinroutineadministrationofoutcomequestionnaires |