Cargando…

Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?

Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agel, Julie, Bransford, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596
_version_ 1782250452724744192
author Agel, Julie
Bransford, Richard
author_facet Agel, Julie
Bransford, Richard
author_sort Agel, Julie
collection PubMed
description Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or monitoring of follow-up. Method: Retrospective review of Health Outcomes Scoring database. Results: During an 18-month period 1,863 patients completed 3,124 SF-36v2 questionnaires. The extent of diagnoses and the uneven timing of follow-ups of the completed questionnaires render this data useless both to the patient and for aggregate analysis. Conclusion: There is no value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires to patient care or clinical research. [Table: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35035092012-12-12 Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires? Agel, Julie Bransford, Richard Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Retrospective case-series of prospective routinely collected Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) data in an outpatient spine clinic. Objective: To determine if there is value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires for the patient and/or clinician without a targeted population or monitoring of follow-up. Method: Retrospective review of Health Outcomes Scoring database. Results: During an 18-month period 1,863 patients completed 3,124 SF-36v2 questionnaires. The extent of diagnoses and the uneven timing of follow-ups of the completed questionnaires render this data useless both to the patient and for aggregate analysis. Conclusion: There is no value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires to patient care or clinical research. [Table: see text] Thieme Medical Publishers 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3503509/ /pubmed/23236301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Agel, Julie
Bransford, Richard
Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title_full Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title_fullStr Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title_full_unstemmed Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title_short Is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
title_sort is there value in routine administration of outcome questionnaires?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298596
work_keys_str_mv AT ageljulie istherevalueinroutineadministrationofoutcomequestionnaires
AT bransfordrichard istherevalueinroutineadministrationofoutcomequestionnaires