Cargando…
Are more observational studies being included in Cochrane Reviews?
BACKGROUND: Increasing the scope of an evidence based approach to areas outside healthcare has renewed the importance of a long-standing discussion on randomised versus observational study designs in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. We investigate statistically if an increasing recogni...
Autores principales: | Kongsted, Hans Christian, Konnerup, Merete |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23069208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-570 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
por: Al Faleh, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Validity of a Cochrane Systematic Review and meta-analysis for determining the safety of vitamin E
por: Oliver, Christopher J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
por: Davey, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review
por: Lawal, Adegboyega K., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies
por: Yaffe, Joanne, et al.
Publicado: (2012)