Cargando…

The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are of particular interest to health care providers, their patients, and those paying for health care services, because they have a high morbidity, they are extremely expensive to treat, and of the survivors only 48% return to work. Consequently the economic burden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobson, Jed J, Epstein, Joel B, Eichmiller, Frederick C, Gibson, Teresa B, Carls, Ginger S, Vogtmann, Emily, Wang, Shaohung, Murphy, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-15
_version_ 1782250459198652416
author Jacobson, Jed J
Epstein, Joel B
Eichmiller, Frederick C
Gibson, Teresa B
Carls, Ginger S
Vogtmann, Emily
Wang, Shaohung
Murphy, Barbara
author_facet Jacobson, Jed J
Epstein, Joel B
Eichmiller, Frederick C
Gibson, Teresa B
Carls, Ginger S
Vogtmann, Emily
Wang, Shaohung
Murphy, Barbara
author_sort Jacobson, Jed J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are of particular interest to health care providers, their patients, and those paying for health care services, because they have a high morbidity, they are extremely expensive to treat, and of the survivors only 48% return to work. Consequently the economic burden of oral cavity, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancer (OC/OP/SG) must be understood. The cost of these cancers in the U.S. has not been investigated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims data for 6,812 OC/OP/SG cancer patients was undertaken. Total annual health care spending for OC/OP/SG cancer patients was compared to similar patients without OC/OP/SG cancer using propensity score matching for enrollees in commercial insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. Indirect costs, as measured by short term disability days were compared for employed patients. RESULTS: Total annual health care spending for OC/OP/SG patients during the year after the index diagnosis was $79,151 for the Commercial population. Health care costs were higher for OC/OP/SG cancer patients with Commercial Insurance ($71,732, n = 3,918), Medicare ($35,890, n = 2,303) and Medicaid ($44,541, n = 585) than the comparison group (all p < 0.01). Commercially-insured employees with cancer (n = 281) had 44.9 more short-term disability days than comparison employees (p < 0.01). Multimodality treatment was twice the cost of single modality therapy. Those patients receiving all three treatments (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) had the highest costs of cost of care, from $96,520 in the Medicare population to $153,892 in the Commercial population. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., the cost of OC/OP/SG cancer is significant and may be the most costly cancer to treat in the U.S. The results of this analysis provide useful information to health care providers and decision makers in understanding the economic burden of head and neck cancer. Additionally, this cost information will greatly assist in determining the cost-effectiveness of new technologies and early detection systems. Earlier identification of cancers by patients and providers may potentially decrease health care costs, morbidity and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35035542012-11-22 The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid Jacobson, Jed J Epstein, Joel B Eichmiller, Frederick C Gibson, Teresa B Carls, Ginger S Vogtmann, Emily Wang, Shaohung Murphy, Barbara Head Neck Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are of particular interest to health care providers, their patients, and those paying for health care services, because they have a high morbidity, they are extremely expensive to treat, and of the survivors only 48% return to work. Consequently the economic burden of oral cavity, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancer (OC/OP/SG) must be understood. The cost of these cancers in the U.S. has not been investigated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims data for 6,812 OC/OP/SG cancer patients was undertaken. Total annual health care spending for OC/OP/SG cancer patients was compared to similar patients without OC/OP/SG cancer using propensity score matching for enrollees in commercial insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. Indirect costs, as measured by short term disability days were compared for employed patients. RESULTS: Total annual health care spending for OC/OP/SG patients during the year after the index diagnosis was $79,151 for the Commercial population. Health care costs were higher for OC/OP/SG cancer patients with Commercial Insurance ($71,732, n = 3,918), Medicare ($35,890, n = 2,303) and Medicaid ($44,541, n = 585) than the comparison group (all p < 0.01). Commercially-insured employees with cancer (n = 281) had 44.9 more short-term disability days than comparison employees (p < 0.01). Multimodality treatment was twice the cost of single modality therapy. Those patients receiving all three treatments (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) had the highest costs of cost of care, from $96,520 in the Medicare population to $153,892 in the Commercial population. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., the cost of OC/OP/SG cancer is significant and may be the most costly cancer to treat in the U.S. The results of this analysis provide useful information to health care providers and decision makers in understanding the economic burden of head and neck cancer. Additionally, this cost information will greatly assist in determining the cost-effectiveness of new technologies and early detection systems. Earlier identification of cancers by patients and providers may potentially decrease health care costs, morbidity and mortality. BioMed Central 2012-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3503554/ /pubmed/22537712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-15 Text en Copyright © 2012 Jacobson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jacobson, Jed J
Epstein, Joel B
Eichmiller, Frederick C
Gibson, Teresa B
Carls, Ginger S
Vogtmann, Emily
Wang, Shaohung
Murphy, Barbara
The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title_full The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title_fullStr The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title_full_unstemmed The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title_short The cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
title_sort cost burden of oral, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancers in three groups: commercial insurance, medicare, and medicaid
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-15
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsonjedj thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT epsteinjoelb thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT eichmillerfrederickc thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT gibsonteresab thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT carlsgingers thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT vogtmannemily thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT wangshaohung thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT murphybarbara thecostburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT jacobsonjedj costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT epsteinjoelb costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT eichmillerfrederickc costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT gibsonteresab costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT carlsgingers costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT vogtmannemily costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT wangshaohung costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid
AT murphybarbara costburdenoforaloralpharyngealandsalivaryglandcancersinthreegroupscommercialinsurancemedicareandmedicaid