Cargando…

Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty

BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an econo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vicari, Kristin J, Tallam, Sai Sandeep, Shatova, Tatyana, Joo, Koh Kang, Scarlata, Christopher J, Humbird, David, Wolfrum, Edward J, Beckham, Gregg T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22507382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23
_version_ 1782250464180436992
author Vicari, Kristin J
Tallam, Sai Sandeep
Shatova, Tatyana
Joo, Koh Kang
Scarlata, Christopher J
Humbird, David
Wolfrum, Edward J
Beckham, Gregg T
author_facet Vicari, Kristin J
Tallam, Sai Sandeep
Shatova, Tatyana
Joo, Koh Kang
Scarlata, Christopher J
Humbird, David
Wolfrum, Edward J
Beckham, Gregg T
author_sort Vicari, Kristin J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an economic model. The process model solves mass and energy balances for each unit, and the economic model estimates capital and operating costs from the process model based on economic assumptions. The process model inputs include experimental data on the feedstock composition and intermediate product yields for each unit. These experimental yield data are calculated from primary measurements. Uncertainty in these primary measurements is propagated to the calculated yields, to the process model, and ultimately to the economic model. Thus, outputs of the TE model have a minimum uncertainty associated with the uncertainty in the primary measurements. RESULTS: We calculate the uncertainty in the Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP) estimate for lignocellulosic ethanol production via a biochemical conversion process: dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation of the resulting sugars to ethanol. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the TE model and identify the feedstock composition and conversion yields from three unit operations (xylose from pretreatment, glucose from enzymatic hydrolysis, and ethanol from fermentation) as the most important variables. The uncertainty in the pretreatment xylose yield arises from multiple measurements, whereas the glucose and ethanol yields from enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, respectively, are dominated by a single measurement: the fraction of insoluble solids (f(IS)) in the biomass slurries. CONCLUSIONS: We calculate a $0.15/gal uncertainty in MESP from the TE model due to uncertainties in primary measurements. This result sets a lower bound on the error bars of the TE model predictions. This analysis highlights the primary measurements that merit further development to reduce the uncertainty associated with their use in TE models. While we develop and apply this mathematical framework to a specific biorefinery scenario here, this analysis can be readily adapted to other types of biorefining processes and provides a general framework for propagating uncertainty due to analytical measurements through a TE model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35035752012-11-27 Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty Vicari, Kristin J Tallam, Sai Sandeep Shatova, Tatyana Joo, Koh Kang Scarlata, Christopher J Humbird, David Wolfrum, Edward J Beckham, Gregg T Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an economic model. The process model solves mass and energy balances for each unit, and the economic model estimates capital and operating costs from the process model based on economic assumptions. The process model inputs include experimental data on the feedstock composition and intermediate product yields for each unit. These experimental yield data are calculated from primary measurements. Uncertainty in these primary measurements is propagated to the calculated yields, to the process model, and ultimately to the economic model. Thus, outputs of the TE model have a minimum uncertainty associated with the uncertainty in the primary measurements. RESULTS: We calculate the uncertainty in the Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP) estimate for lignocellulosic ethanol production via a biochemical conversion process: dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation of the resulting sugars to ethanol. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the TE model and identify the feedstock composition and conversion yields from three unit operations (xylose from pretreatment, glucose from enzymatic hydrolysis, and ethanol from fermentation) as the most important variables. The uncertainty in the pretreatment xylose yield arises from multiple measurements, whereas the glucose and ethanol yields from enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, respectively, are dominated by a single measurement: the fraction of insoluble solids (f(IS)) in the biomass slurries. CONCLUSIONS: We calculate a $0.15/gal uncertainty in MESP from the TE model due to uncertainties in primary measurements. This result sets a lower bound on the error bars of the TE model predictions. This analysis highlights the primary measurements that merit further development to reduce the uncertainty associated with their use in TE models. While we develop and apply this mathematical framework to a specific biorefinery scenario here, this analysis can be readily adapted to other types of biorefining processes and provides a general framework for propagating uncertainty due to analytical measurements through a TE model. BioMed Central 2012-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3503575/ /pubmed/22507382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vicari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vicari, Kristin J
Tallam, Sai Sandeep
Shatova, Tatyana
Joo, Koh Kang
Scarlata, Christopher J
Humbird, David
Wolfrum, Edward J
Beckham, Gregg T
Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title_full Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title_fullStr Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title_short Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
title_sort uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22507382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23
work_keys_str_mv AT vicarikristinj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT tallamsaisandeep uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT shatovatatyana uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT jookohkang uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT scarlatachristopherj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT humbirddavid uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT wolfrumedwardj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty
AT beckhamgreggt uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty