Cargando…
Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty
BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an econo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22507382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23 |
_version_ | 1782250464180436992 |
---|---|
author | Vicari, Kristin J Tallam, Sai Sandeep Shatova, Tatyana Joo, Koh Kang Scarlata, Christopher J Humbird, David Wolfrum, Edward J Beckham, Gregg T |
author_facet | Vicari, Kristin J Tallam, Sai Sandeep Shatova, Tatyana Joo, Koh Kang Scarlata, Christopher J Humbird, David Wolfrum, Edward J Beckham, Gregg T |
author_sort | Vicari, Kristin J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an economic model. The process model solves mass and energy balances for each unit, and the economic model estimates capital and operating costs from the process model based on economic assumptions. The process model inputs include experimental data on the feedstock composition and intermediate product yields for each unit. These experimental yield data are calculated from primary measurements. Uncertainty in these primary measurements is propagated to the calculated yields, to the process model, and ultimately to the economic model. Thus, outputs of the TE model have a minimum uncertainty associated with the uncertainty in the primary measurements. RESULTS: We calculate the uncertainty in the Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP) estimate for lignocellulosic ethanol production via a biochemical conversion process: dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation of the resulting sugars to ethanol. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the TE model and identify the feedstock composition and conversion yields from three unit operations (xylose from pretreatment, glucose from enzymatic hydrolysis, and ethanol from fermentation) as the most important variables. The uncertainty in the pretreatment xylose yield arises from multiple measurements, whereas the glucose and ethanol yields from enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, respectively, are dominated by a single measurement: the fraction of insoluble solids (f(IS)) in the biomass slurries. CONCLUSIONS: We calculate a $0.15/gal uncertainty in MESP from the TE model due to uncertainties in primary measurements. This result sets a lower bound on the error bars of the TE model predictions. This analysis highlights the primary measurements that merit further development to reduce the uncertainty associated with their use in TE models. While we develop and apply this mathematical framework to a specific biorefinery scenario here, this analysis can be readily adapted to other types of biorefining processes and provides a general framework for propagating uncertainty due to analytical measurements through a TE model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3503575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35035752012-11-27 Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty Vicari, Kristin J Tallam, Sai Sandeep Shatova, Tatyana Joo, Koh Kang Scarlata, Christopher J Humbird, David Wolfrum, Edward J Beckham, Gregg T Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuels remains a major financial and technical challenge at the industrial scale. A critical tool in biofuels process development is the techno-economic (TE) model, which calculates biofuel production costs using a process model and an economic model. The process model solves mass and energy balances for each unit, and the economic model estimates capital and operating costs from the process model based on economic assumptions. The process model inputs include experimental data on the feedstock composition and intermediate product yields for each unit. These experimental yield data are calculated from primary measurements. Uncertainty in these primary measurements is propagated to the calculated yields, to the process model, and ultimately to the economic model. Thus, outputs of the TE model have a minimum uncertainty associated with the uncertainty in the primary measurements. RESULTS: We calculate the uncertainty in the Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP) estimate for lignocellulosic ethanol production via a biochemical conversion process: dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation of the resulting sugars to ethanol. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the TE model and identify the feedstock composition and conversion yields from three unit operations (xylose from pretreatment, glucose from enzymatic hydrolysis, and ethanol from fermentation) as the most important variables. The uncertainty in the pretreatment xylose yield arises from multiple measurements, whereas the glucose and ethanol yields from enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, respectively, are dominated by a single measurement: the fraction of insoluble solids (f(IS)) in the biomass slurries. CONCLUSIONS: We calculate a $0.15/gal uncertainty in MESP from the TE model due to uncertainties in primary measurements. This result sets a lower bound on the error bars of the TE model predictions. This analysis highlights the primary measurements that merit further development to reduce the uncertainty associated with their use in TE models. While we develop and apply this mathematical framework to a specific biorefinery scenario here, this analysis can be readily adapted to other types of biorefining processes and provides a general framework for propagating uncertainty due to analytical measurements through a TE model. BioMed Central 2012-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3503575/ /pubmed/22507382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vicari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vicari, Kristin J Tallam, Sai Sandeep Shatova, Tatyana Joo, Koh Kang Scarlata, Christopher J Humbird, David Wolfrum, Edward J Beckham, Gregg T Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title | Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title_full | Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title_short | Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
title_sort | uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22507382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vicarikristinj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT tallamsaisandeep uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT shatovatatyana uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT jookohkang uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT scarlatachristopherj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT humbirddavid uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT wolfrumedwardj uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty AT beckhamgreggt uncertaintyintechnoeconomicestimatesofcellulosicethanolproductionduetoexperimentalmeasurementuncertainty |