Cargando…

Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India

BACKGROUND: In resource limited settings non-availability of CD4 count facility at the site could adversely affect the ART roll out programme. Point of care CD4 enumerating equipments can make the CD4 count available at the site of care and improve the patients’ management considerably. This study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakar, Madhuri, Mahajan, Bharati, Shaikh, Nawaj, Bagwan, Salman, Sane, Suvarna, Kabra, Sandhya, Rewari, Bharat, Shaukat, Mohamad, Singh, Namita, Trevor, Peter, Paranjape, Ramesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22998738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-9-26
_version_ 1782250464869351424
author Thakar, Madhuri
Mahajan, Bharati
Shaikh, Nawaj
Bagwan, Salman
Sane, Suvarna
Kabra, Sandhya
Rewari, Bharat
Shaukat, Mohamad
Singh, Namita
Trevor, Peter
Paranjape, Ramesh
author_facet Thakar, Madhuri
Mahajan, Bharati
Shaikh, Nawaj
Bagwan, Salman
Sane, Suvarna
Kabra, Sandhya
Rewari, Bharat
Shaukat, Mohamad
Singh, Namita
Trevor, Peter
Paranjape, Ramesh
author_sort Thakar, Madhuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In resource limited settings non-availability of CD4 count facility at the site could adversely affect the ART roll out programme. Point of care CD4 enumerating equipments can make the CD4 count available at the site of care and improve the patients’ management considerably. This study is aimed at determining the utility of a Point of Care PIMA CD4 analyzer (Alere, Germany) in the field settings in India. METHOD: The blood samples were collected from 1790 participants at 21 ART centers from different parts of the country and tested using PIMA and the reference methods (FACSCalibur, FACSCount and CyFlow SL3). The paired finger prick and venous blood samples from 175 participants were tested by the PIMA CD4 Analyzer and then by FACSCalibur. RESULT: The CD4 counts obtained by PIMA CD4 analyzer showed excellent correlation with the counts obtained by the reference methods; for venous blood the Pearson’s r was 0.921, p < 0.001 and the relative bias was 0.2% (range: -42 to 42%) and for finger prick samples, the Pearson’s r was 0.856 and the relative bias was −9.1% (range: -46% to 27%). For CD4 ranges; <250, 251–350, 351–500 and >500 cells/mm3, the differences in the median CD4 counts obtained by the reference method and the PIMA analyzer were not significant (P > 0.05) and the relative bias were low (−7 to 5.1%). The Intermachine comparison showed variation within the acceptable limit of%CV of 10%. CONCLUSION: In the field settings, the POC PIMA CD4 analyzer gave CD4 counts comparable to the reference methods for all CD4 ranges. The POC equipment could identify the patients eligible for ART in 91% cases. Adequate training is necessary for finger prick sample collection for optimum results. Decentralization of CD4 testing by making the CD4 counts available at primary health centers, especially in remote areas with minimum or no infrastructure would reduce the missed visits and improve adherence of the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35035782012-11-22 Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India Thakar, Madhuri Mahajan, Bharati Shaikh, Nawaj Bagwan, Salman Sane, Suvarna Kabra, Sandhya Rewari, Bharat Shaukat, Mohamad Singh, Namita Trevor, Peter Paranjape, Ramesh AIDS Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: In resource limited settings non-availability of CD4 count facility at the site could adversely affect the ART roll out programme. Point of care CD4 enumerating equipments can make the CD4 count available at the site of care and improve the patients’ management considerably. This study is aimed at determining the utility of a Point of Care PIMA CD4 analyzer (Alere, Germany) in the field settings in India. METHOD: The blood samples were collected from 1790 participants at 21 ART centers from different parts of the country and tested using PIMA and the reference methods (FACSCalibur, FACSCount and CyFlow SL3). The paired finger prick and venous blood samples from 175 participants were tested by the PIMA CD4 Analyzer and then by FACSCalibur. RESULT: The CD4 counts obtained by PIMA CD4 analyzer showed excellent correlation with the counts obtained by the reference methods; for venous blood the Pearson’s r was 0.921, p < 0.001 and the relative bias was 0.2% (range: -42 to 42%) and for finger prick samples, the Pearson’s r was 0.856 and the relative bias was −9.1% (range: -46% to 27%). For CD4 ranges; <250, 251–350, 351–500 and >500 cells/mm3, the differences in the median CD4 counts obtained by the reference method and the PIMA analyzer were not significant (P > 0.05) and the relative bias were low (−7 to 5.1%). The Intermachine comparison showed variation within the acceptable limit of%CV of 10%. CONCLUSION: In the field settings, the POC PIMA CD4 analyzer gave CD4 counts comparable to the reference methods for all CD4 ranges. The POC equipment could identify the patients eligible for ART in 91% cases. Adequate training is necessary for finger prick sample collection for optimum results. Decentralization of CD4 testing by making the CD4 counts available at primary health centers, especially in remote areas with minimum or no infrastructure would reduce the missed visits and improve adherence of the patients. BioMed Central 2012-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3503578/ /pubmed/22998738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-9-26 Text en Copyright ©2012 Thakar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Thakar, Madhuri
Mahajan, Bharati
Shaikh, Nawaj
Bagwan, Salman
Sane, Suvarna
Kabra, Sandhya
Rewari, Bharat
Shaukat, Mohamad
Singh, Namita
Trevor, Peter
Paranjape, Ramesh
Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title_full Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title_fullStr Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title_short Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India
title_sort utility of the point of care cd4 analyzer, pima, to enumerate cd4 counts in the field settings in india
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22998738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-9-26
work_keys_str_mv AT thakarmadhuri utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT mahajanbharati utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT shaikhnawaj utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT bagwansalman utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT sanesuvarna utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT kabrasandhya utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT rewaribharat utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT shaukatmohamad utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT singhnamita utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT trevorpeter utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia
AT paranjaperamesh utilityofthepointofcarecd4analyzerpimatoenumeratecd4countsinthefieldsettingsinindia