Cargando…

The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: In many countries out-of-hours care faces serious challenges, including shortage of general practitioners, a high workload, reduced motivation to work out of hours, and increased demand for out-of-hours care. One response to these challenges is the introduction of nurse practitioner as d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijers, Nancy, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Giesen, Paul, Vrijhoef, Hubertus, van der Burgt, Regi, Mintjes, Joke, Wensing, Michel, Laurant, Miranda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22870898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-75
_version_ 1782250515773521920
author Wijers, Nancy
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Giesen, Paul
Vrijhoef, Hubertus
van der Burgt, Regi
Mintjes, Joke
Wensing, Michel
Laurant, Miranda
author_facet Wijers, Nancy
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Giesen, Paul
Vrijhoef, Hubertus
van der Burgt, Regi
Mintjes, Joke
Wensing, Michel
Laurant, Miranda
author_sort Wijers, Nancy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In many countries out-of-hours care faces serious challenges, including shortage of general practitioners, a high workload, reduced motivation to work out of hours, and increased demand for out-of-hours care. One response to these challenges is the introduction of nurse practitioner as doctor substitutes, in order to maintain the (high) accessibility and safety of out of hours care. Although nurse practitioners have proven to provide equally safe and efficient care during daytime primary care, it is unclear whether substitution is effective and efficient in the more complex out of hours primary care. This study aims to assess the effects of substitution of care from general practitioners to nurse practitioners in an out of hours primary care setting. DESIGN: A quasi experimental study is undertaken at one “general practitioner cooperative” to offer out-of-hours care for 304.000 people in the South East of the Netherlands. In the experimental condition patient care is provided by a team of one nurse practitioner and four general practitioners; where the nurse practitioner replaces one general practitioner during one day of the weekend from 10 am to 5 pm. In the control condition patient care is provided by a team of five general practitioners during the other day of the weekend, also from 10 am to 5 pm. The study period last 15 months, from April 2011 till July 2012. METHODS: Data will be collected on number of different outcomes using a range of methods. Our primary outcome is substitution of care. This is calculated using the number and characteristics of patients that have a consultation at the GP cooperative. We compare the number of patients seen by both professionals, type of complaints, resource utilization (e.g. prescription, tests, investigations, referrals) and waiting times in the experimental condition and control condition. This data is derived from patient electronic medical records. Secondary outcomes are: patient satisfaction; general practitioners workload; quality and safety of care and barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: The study will provide evidence whether substitution of care in out-of-hours setting is safe and efficient and give insight into barriers and facilitators related to the introduction of nurse practitioners in out-of-hours setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01388374
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35038172012-11-22 The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol Wijers, Nancy Schoonhoven, Lisette Giesen, Paul Vrijhoef, Hubertus van der Burgt, Regi Mintjes, Joke Wensing, Michel Laurant, Miranda BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In many countries out-of-hours care faces serious challenges, including shortage of general practitioners, a high workload, reduced motivation to work out of hours, and increased demand for out-of-hours care. One response to these challenges is the introduction of nurse practitioner as doctor substitutes, in order to maintain the (high) accessibility and safety of out of hours care. Although nurse practitioners have proven to provide equally safe and efficient care during daytime primary care, it is unclear whether substitution is effective and efficient in the more complex out of hours primary care. This study aims to assess the effects of substitution of care from general practitioners to nurse practitioners in an out of hours primary care setting. DESIGN: A quasi experimental study is undertaken at one “general practitioner cooperative” to offer out-of-hours care for 304.000 people in the South East of the Netherlands. In the experimental condition patient care is provided by a team of one nurse practitioner and four general practitioners; where the nurse practitioner replaces one general practitioner during one day of the weekend from 10 am to 5 pm. In the control condition patient care is provided by a team of five general practitioners during the other day of the weekend, also from 10 am to 5 pm. The study period last 15 months, from April 2011 till July 2012. METHODS: Data will be collected on number of different outcomes using a range of methods. Our primary outcome is substitution of care. This is calculated using the number and characteristics of patients that have a consultation at the GP cooperative. We compare the number of patients seen by both professionals, type of complaints, resource utilization (e.g. prescription, tests, investigations, referrals) and waiting times in the experimental condition and control condition. This data is derived from patient electronic medical records. Secondary outcomes are: patient satisfaction; general practitioners workload; quality and safety of care and barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: The study will provide evidence whether substitution of care in out-of-hours setting is safe and efficient and give insight into barriers and facilitators related to the introduction of nurse practitioners in out-of-hours setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01388374 BioMed Central 2012-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3503817/ /pubmed/22870898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-75 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wijers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wijers, Nancy
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Giesen, Paul
Vrijhoef, Hubertus
van der Burgt, Regi
Mintjes, Joke
Wensing, Michel
Laurant, Miranda
The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title_full The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title_fullStr The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title_short The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol
title_sort effectiveness of nurse practitioners working at a gp cooperative: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22870898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-75
work_keys_str_mv AT wijersnancy theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT schoonhovenlisette theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT giesenpaul theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT vrijhoefhubertus theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT vanderburgtregi theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT mintjesjoke theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT wensingmichel theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT laurantmiranda theeffectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT wijersnancy effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT schoonhovenlisette effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT giesenpaul effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT vrijhoefhubertus effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT vanderburgtregi effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT mintjesjoke effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT wensingmichel effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol
AT laurantmiranda effectivenessofnursepractitionersworkingatagpcooperativeastudyprotocol