Cargando…

The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Yong-Soon, Yu, Ki Pi, Kim, Hyojoon, Kim, Hyoung-ihl, Kwak, Soo Hyun, Kim, Bong Ok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185723
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596
_version_ 1782250535808663552
author Yoon, Yong-Soon
Yu, Ki Pi
Kim, Hyojoon
Kim, Hyoung-ihl
Kwak, Soo Hyun
Kim, Bong Ok
author_facet Yoon, Yong-Soon
Yu, Ki Pi
Kim, Hyojoon
Kim, Hyoung-ihl
Kwak, Soo Hyun
Kim, Bong Ok
author_sort Yoon, Yong-Soon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group. CONCLUSION: Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35039342012-11-26 The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats Yoon, Yong-Soon Yu, Ki Pi Kim, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kwak, Soo Hyun Kim, Bong Ok Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group. CONCLUSION: Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012-10 2012-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3503934/ /pubmed/23185723 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoon, Yong-Soon
Yu, Ki Pi
Kim, Hyojoon
Kim, Hyoung-ihl
Kwak, Soo Hyun
Kim, Bong Ok
The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title_full The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title_fullStr The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title_short The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
title_sort effect of electric cortical stimulation after focal traumatic brain injury in rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185723
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonyongsoon theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT yukipi theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimhyojoon theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimhyoungihl theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kwaksoohyun theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimbongok theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT yoonyongsoon effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT yukipi effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimhyojoon effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimhyoungihl effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kwaksoohyun effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats
AT kimbongok effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats