Cargando…
The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185723 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596 |
_version_ | 1782250535808663552 |
---|---|
author | Yoon, Yong-Soon Yu, Ki Pi Kim, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kwak, Soo Hyun Kim, Bong Ok |
author_facet | Yoon, Yong-Soon Yu, Ki Pi Kim, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kwak, Soo Hyun Kim, Bong Ok |
author_sort | Yoon, Yong-Soon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group. CONCLUSION: Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3503934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35039342012-11-26 The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats Yoon, Yong-Soon Yu, Ki Pi Kim, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kwak, Soo Hyun Kim, Bong Ok Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain. METHOD: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group. CONCLUSION: Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012-10 2012-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3503934/ /pubmed/23185723 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yoon, Yong-Soon Yu, Ki Pi Kim, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kwak, Soo Hyun Kim, Bong Ok The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title | The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title_full | The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title_short | The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats |
title_sort | effect of electric cortical stimulation after focal traumatic brain injury in rats |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185723 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoonyongsoon theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT yukipi theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimhyojoon theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimhyoungihl theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kwaksoohyun theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimbongok theeffectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT yoonyongsoon effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT yukipi effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimhyojoon effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimhyoungihl effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kwaksoohyun effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats AT kimbongok effectofelectriccorticalstimulationafterfocaltraumaticbraininjuryinrats |