Cargando…

Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation

BACKGROUND: Although some research suggests that fetuses yawn, others disagree arguing that is it simple mouth opening. Furthermore there is no developmental account of fetal yawning compared with simple mouth opening. The aim of the present study was to establish in a repeated measures design the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reissland, Nadja, Francis, Brian, Mason, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050569
_version_ 1782250540901597184
author Reissland, Nadja
Francis, Brian
Mason, James
author_facet Reissland, Nadja
Francis, Brian
Mason, James
author_sort Reissland, Nadja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although some research suggests that fetuses yawn, others disagree arguing that is it simple mouth opening. Furthermore there is no developmental account of fetal yawning compared with simple mouth opening. The aim of the present study was to establish in a repeated measures design the development of fetal yawning compared with simple mouth opening. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: Video recordings were made of the fetal face and upper torso visualized by means of 4D full frontal or facial profile ultrasound recordings. Fifteen healthy fetuses were scanned four times at 24, 28, 32 and 36 weeks gestation. Yawning was distinguished from non-yawning in terms of the length of time it took to reach the apex of the mouth stretch, with yawns being defined as more than 50% of the total time observed. To assess changes in frequency, a Poisson mixed effects model was fitted to the count of number of yawn and simple mouth opening events with age and gender as fixed effects, and person as a random effect. For both yawns and simple mouth openings a smooth varying age effect was significant. The number of yawns observed declined with age from 28 weeks gestation, whereas simple mouth openings were less frequent and the decline was observed from 24 weeks. Gender was not significant either for yawn and simple mouth openings. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Yawning can be reliably distinguished from other forms of mouth opening with the potential of using yawning as an index of fetal healthy development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3503956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35039562012-11-26 Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation Reissland, Nadja Francis, Brian Mason, James PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although some research suggests that fetuses yawn, others disagree arguing that is it simple mouth opening. Furthermore there is no developmental account of fetal yawning compared with simple mouth opening. The aim of the present study was to establish in a repeated measures design the development of fetal yawning compared with simple mouth opening. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: Video recordings were made of the fetal face and upper torso visualized by means of 4D full frontal or facial profile ultrasound recordings. Fifteen healthy fetuses were scanned four times at 24, 28, 32 and 36 weeks gestation. Yawning was distinguished from non-yawning in terms of the length of time it took to reach the apex of the mouth stretch, with yawns being defined as more than 50% of the total time observed. To assess changes in frequency, a Poisson mixed effects model was fitted to the count of number of yawn and simple mouth opening events with age and gender as fixed effects, and person as a random effect. For both yawns and simple mouth openings a smooth varying age effect was significant. The number of yawns observed declined with age from 28 weeks gestation, whereas simple mouth openings were less frequent and the decline was observed from 24 weeks. Gender was not significant either for yawn and simple mouth openings. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Yawning can be reliably distinguished from other forms of mouth opening with the potential of using yawning as an index of fetal healthy development. Public Library of Science 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3503956/ /pubmed/23185638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050569 Text en © 2012 Reissland et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reissland, Nadja
Francis, Brian
Mason, James
Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title_full Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title_fullStr Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title_full_unstemmed Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title_short Development of Fetal Yawn Compared with Non-Yawn Mouth Openings from 24–36 Weeks Gestation
title_sort development of fetal yawn compared with non-yawn mouth openings from 24–36 weeks gestation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050569
work_keys_str_mv AT reisslandnadja developmentoffetalyawncomparedwithnonyawnmouthopeningsfrom2436weeksgestation
AT francisbrian developmentoffetalyawncomparedwithnonyawnmouthopeningsfrom2436weeksgestation
AT masonjames developmentoffetalyawncomparedwithnonyawnmouthopeningsfrom2436weeksgestation