Cargando…
Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact
We tested the underlying assumption that citation counts are reliable predictors of future success, analyzing complete citation data on the careers of [Image: see text] scientists. Our results show that i) among all citation indicators, the annual citations at the time of prediction is the best pred...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049246 |
_version_ | 1782250555798716416 |
---|---|
author | Mazloumian, Amin |
author_facet | Mazloumian, Amin |
author_sort | Mazloumian, Amin |
collection | PubMed |
description | We tested the underlying assumption that citation counts are reliable predictors of future success, analyzing complete citation data on the careers of [Image: see text] scientists. Our results show that i) among all citation indicators, the annual citations at the time of prediction is the best predictor of future citations, ii) future citations of a scientist's published papers can be predicted accurately ([Image: see text] for a 1-year prediction, [Image: see text]) but iii) future citations of future work are hardly predictable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3504022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35040222012-11-26 Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact Mazloumian, Amin PLoS One Research Article We tested the underlying assumption that citation counts are reliable predictors of future success, analyzing complete citation data on the careers of [Image: see text] scientists. Our results show that i) among all citation indicators, the annual citations at the time of prediction is the best predictor of future citations, ii) future citations of a scientist's published papers can be predicted accurately ([Image: see text] for a 1-year prediction, [Image: see text]) but iii) future citations of future work are hardly predictable. Public Library of Science 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3504022/ /pubmed/23185311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049246 Text en © 2012 Amin Mazloumian http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mazloumian, Amin Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title | Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title_full | Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title_fullStr | Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title_short | Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact |
title_sort | predicting scholars' scientific impact |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazloumianamin predictingscholarsscientificimpact |