Cargando…

Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?

We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Zee, Emile, Zulch, Helen, Mills, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382
_version_ 1782250556494970880
author van der Zee, Emile
Zulch, Helen
Mills, Daniel
author_facet van der Zee, Emile
Zulch, Helen
Mills, Daniel
author_sort van der Zee, Emile
collection PubMed
description We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3504025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35040252012-11-26 Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? van der Zee, Emile Zulch, Helen Mills, Daniel PLoS One Research Article We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs. Public Library of Science 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3504025/ /pubmed/23185321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382 Text en © 2012 van der Zee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Zee, Emile
Zulch, Helen
Mills, Daniel
Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title_full Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title_fullStr Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title_full_unstemmed Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title_short Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
title_sort word generalization by a dog (canis familiaris): is shape important?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderzeeemile wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant
AT zulchhelen wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant
AT millsdaniel wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant