Cargando…
Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?
We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382 |
_version_ | 1782250556494970880 |
---|---|
author | van der Zee, Emile Zulch, Helen Mills, Daniel |
author_facet | van der Zee, Emile Zulch, Helen Mills, Daniel |
author_sort | van der Zee, Emile |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3504025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35040252012-11-26 Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? van der Zee, Emile Zulch, Helen Mills, Daniel PLoS One Research Article We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs. Public Library of Science 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3504025/ /pubmed/23185321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382 Text en © 2012 van der Zee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Zee, Emile Zulch, Helen Mills, Daniel Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title | Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title_full | Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title_fullStr | Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title_full_unstemmed | Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title_short | Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important? |
title_sort | word generalization by a dog (canis familiaris): is shape important? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderzeeemile wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant AT zulchhelen wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant AT millsdaniel wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant |