Cargando…

Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores

1. Wildlife managers often rely on resource users, such as recreational or commercial hunters, to achieve management goals. The use of hunters to control wildlife populations is especially common for predators and ungulates, but managers cannot assume that hunters will always fill annual quotas set...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bischof, Richard, Nilsen, Erlend B., Brøseth, Henrik, Männil, Peep, Ozoliņš, Jaānis, Linnell, John D. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23197878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02167.x
_version_ 1782250567257554944
author Bischof, Richard
Nilsen, Erlend B.
Brøseth, Henrik
Männil, Peep
Ozoliņš, Jaānis
Linnell, John D. C.
author_facet Bischof, Richard
Nilsen, Erlend B.
Brøseth, Henrik
Männil, Peep
Ozoliņš, Jaānis
Linnell, John D. C.
author_sort Bischof, Richard
collection PubMed
description 1. Wildlife managers often rely on resource users, such as recreational or commercial hunters, to achieve management goals. The use of hunters to control wildlife populations is especially common for predators and ungulates, but managers cannot assume that hunters will always fill annual quotas set by the authorities. It has been advocated that resource management models should account for uncertainty in how harvest rules are realized, requiring that this implementation uncertainty be estimated. 2. We used a survival analysis framework and long‐term harvest data from large carnivore management systems in three countries (Estonia, Latvia and Norway) involving four species (brown bear, grey wolf, Eurasian lynx and wolverine) to estimate the performance of hunters with respect to harvest goals set by managers. 3. Variation in hunter quota‐filling performance was substantial, ranging from 40% for wolverine in Norway to nearly 100% for lynx in Latvia. Seasonal and regional variation was also high within country–species pairs. We detected a positive relationship between the instantaneous potential to fill a quota slot and the relative availability of the target species for both wolverine and lynx in Norway. 4. Survivor curves and hazards – with survival time measured as the time from the start of a season until a quota slot is filled – can indicate the extent to which managers can influence harvest through adjustments of season duration and quota limits. 5.  Synthesis and applications. We investigated seven systems where authorities use recreational hunting to manage large carnivore populations. The variation and magnitude of deviation from harvest goals was substantial, underlining the need to incorporate implementation uncertainty into resource management models and decisions‐making. We illustrate how survival analysis can be used by managers to estimate the performance of resource users with respect to achieving harvest goals set by managers. The findings in this study come at an opportune time given the growing popularity of management strategy evaluation (MSE) models in fisheries and a push towards incorporating MSE into terrestrial harvest management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3504070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35040702012-11-27 Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores Bischof, Richard Nilsen, Erlend B. Brøseth, Henrik Männil, Peep Ozoliņš, Jaānis Linnell, John D. C. J Appl Ecol Modelling for Management 1. Wildlife managers often rely on resource users, such as recreational or commercial hunters, to achieve management goals. The use of hunters to control wildlife populations is especially common for predators and ungulates, but managers cannot assume that hunters will always fill annual quotas set by the authorities. It has been advocated that resource management models should account for uncertainty in how harvest rules are realized, requiring that this implementation uncertainty be estimated. 2. We used a survival analysis framework and long‐term harvest data from large carnivore management systems in three countries (Estonia, Latvia and Norway) involving four species (brown bear, grey wolf, Eurasian lynx and wolverine) to estimate the performance of hunters with respect to harvest goals set by managers. 3. Variation in hunter quota‐filling performance was substantial, ranging from 40% for wolverine in Norway to nearly 100% for lynx in Latvia. Seasonal and regional variation was also high within country–species pairs. We detected a positive relationship between the instantaneous potential to fill a quota slot and the relative availability of the target species for both wolverine and lynx in Norway. 4. Survivor curves and hazards – with survival time measured as the time from the start of a season until a quota slot is filled – can indicate the extent to which managers can influence harvest through adjustments of season duration and quota limits. 5.  Synthesis and applications. We investigated seven systems where authorities use recreational hunting to manage large carnivore populations. The variation and magnitude of deviation from harvest goals was substantial, underlining the need to incorporate implementation uncertainty into resource management models and decisions‐making. We illustrate how survival analysis can be used by managers to estimate the performance of resource users with respect to achieving harvest goals set by managers. The findings in this study come at an opportune time given the growing popularity of management strategy evaluation (MSE) models in fisheries and a push towards incorporating MSE into terrestrial harvest management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-07-02 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3504070/ /pubmed/23197878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02167.x Text en © 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society Open access.
spellingShingle Modelling for Management
Bischof, Richard
Nilsen, Erlend B.
Brøseth, Henrik
Männil, Peep
Ozoliņš, Jaānis
Linnell, John D. C.
Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title_full Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title_fullStr Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title_full_unstemmed Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title_short Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
title_sort implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores
topic Modelling for Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23197878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02167.x
work_keys_str_mv AT bischofrichard implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores
AT nilsenerlendb implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores
AT brøsethhenrik implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores
AT mannilpeep implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores
AT ozolinsjaanis implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores
AT linnelljohndc implementationuncertaintywhenusingrecreationalhuntingtomanagecarnivores