Cargando…

Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?

OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity and to investigate whether these associations vary by characteristics of hysterectomy and are independent of pre-hysterectomy adiposity and potential confounding factors. METHODS: Using information on women from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Rachel, Kuh, Diana, Hardy, Rebecca, Power, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17945444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.09.004
_version_ 1782250668154683392
author Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Hardy, Rebecca
Power, Chris
author_facet Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Hardy, Rebecca
Power, Chris
author_sort Cooper, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity and to investigate whether these associations vary by characteristics of hysterectomy and are independent of pre-hysterectomy adiposity and potential confounding factors. METHODS: Using information on women from the 1946 and 1958 British birth cohort studies (N = 1790 and 4552, respectively), collected prospectively across life, regression analyses were used to examine the associations between hysterectomy and subsequent body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses there was a difference of 1.18 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 0.64, 1.74) in mean BMI and of 2.72 cm (1.45, 3.99) in waist circumference at age 44–45 years between women who had undergone hysterectomy and those who had not in the 1958 cohort, and differences of 0.76 kg/m(2) (−0.05, 1.57) and 0.34 cm (−1.58, 2.26) at age 43 years and 0.81 kg/m(2) (0.14, 1.49) and 1.45 cm (−0.15, 3.05) at age 53 years in the 1946 cohort. These differences attenuated and were no longer significant after adjustment for pre-hysterectomy BMI and confounders. There was no strong evidence of variation in associations by oophorectomy status, timing, route of or reason for procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that British women who had previously undergone hysterectomy had higher BMI and waist circumference in middle-age than others. These differences appear to be accounted for by the higher BMI in earlier adulthood and increased levels of risk factors associated with both adiposity and hysterectomy risk among women who had undergone hysterectomy. This suggests that women are unlikely to gain weight as a direct result of hysterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3504656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35046562012-12-26 Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity? Cooper, Rachel Kuh, Diana Hardy, Rebecca Power, Chris Maturitas Article OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity and to investigate whether these associations vary by characteristics of hysterectomy and are independent of pre-hysterectomy adiposity and potential confounding factors. METHODS: Using information on women from the 1946 and 1958 British birth cohort studies (N = 1790 and 4552, respectively), collected prospectively across life, regression analyses were used to examine the associations between hysterectomy and subsequent body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses there was a difference of 1.18 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 0.64, 1.74) in mean BMI and of 2.72 cm (1.45, 3.99) in waist circumference at age 44–45 years between women who had undergone hysterectomy and those who had not in the 1958 cohort, and differences of 0.76 kg/m(2) (−0.05, 1.57) and 0.34 cm (−1.58, 2.26) at age 43 years and 0.81 kg/m(2) (0.14, 1.49) and 1.45 cm (−0.15, 3.05) at age 53 years in the 1946 cohort. These differences attenuated and were no longer significant after adjustment for pre-hysterectomy BMI and confounders. There was no strong evidence of variation in associations by oophorectomy status, timing, route of or reason for procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that British women who had previously undergone hysterectomy had higher BMI and waist circumference in middle-age than others. These differences appear to be accounted for by the higher BMI in earlier adulthood and increased levels of risk factors associated with both adiposity and hysterectomy risk among women who had undergone hysterectomy. This suggests that women are unlikely to gain weight as a direct result of hysterectomy. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press 2007-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3504656/ /pubmed/17945444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.09.004 Text en © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Hardy, Rebecca
Power, Chris
Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title_full Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title_fullStr Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title_full_unstemmed Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title_short Is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
title_sort is there an association between hysterectomy and subsequent adiposity?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17945444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperrachel isthereanassociationbetweenhysterectomyandsubsequentadiposity
AT kuhdiana isthereanassociationbetweenhysterectomyandsubsequentadiposity
AT hardyrebecca isthereanassociationbetweenhysterectomyandsubsequentadiposity
AT powerchris isthereanassociationbetweenhysterectomyandsubsequentadiposity