Cargando…
Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence informatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266 |
_version_ | 1782250721502035968 |
---|---|
author | Abu Almakarem, Amal S Heilman, Katie L Conger, Heather L Shtarkman, Yury M Rogers, Scott O |
author_facet | Abu Almakarem, Amal S Heilman, Katie L Conger, Heather L Shtarkman, Yury M Rogers, Scott O |
author_sort | Abu Almakarem, Amal S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence information. An extraction method to obtain high quality DNA in field studies is described. FINDINGS: DNA extracted immediately after sampling was compared to DNA extracted after allowing the sampled tissues to air dry at 21°C for 48 or 72 hours. While DNA extracted from fresh tissues exhibited little degradation, DNA extracted from all tissues exposed to 21°C air for 48 or 72 hours exhibited varying degrees of degradation. Yield was higher for extractions from fresh tissues in most cases. Four microcentrifuges were compared for DNA yield: one standard electric laboratory microcentrifuge (max rcf = 16,000×g), two battery-operated microcentrifuges (max rcf = 5,000 and 3,000 ×g), and one manually-operated microcentrifuge (max rcf = 120×g). Yields for all centrifuges were similar. DNA extracted under simulated field conditions was similar in yield and quality to DNA extracted in the laboratory using the same equipment. CONCLUSIONS: This CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) DNA extraction method employs battery-operated and manually-operated equipment to isolate high quality DNA in the field. The method was tested on plant and fungus tissues, and may be adapted for other types of organisms. The method produced high quality DNA in laboratory tests and under simulated field conditions. The field extraction method should prove useful for working in remote sites, where ice, dry ice, and liquid nitrogen are unavailable; where degradation is likely to occur due to the long distances between the sample site and the laboratory; and in instances where other DNA preservation and transportation methods have been unsuccessful. It may be possible to adapt this method for genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic projects using samples collected in situ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3505157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35051572012-11-24 Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ Abu Almakarem, Amal S Heilman, Katie L Conger, Heather L Shtarkman, Yury M Rogers, Scott O BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence information. An extraction method to obtain high quality DNA in field studies is described. FINDINGS: DNA extracted immediately after sampling was compared to DNA extracted after allowing the sampled tissues to air dry at 21°C for 48 or 72 hours. While DNA extracted from fresh tissues exhibited little degradation, DNA extracted from all tissues exposed to 21°C air for 48 or 72 hours exhibited varying degrees of degradation. Yield was higher for extractions from fresh tissues in most cases. Four microcentrifuges were compared for DNA yield: one standard electric laboratory microcentrifuge (max rcf = 16,000×g), two battery-operated microcentrifuges (max rcf = 5,000 and 3,000 ×g), and one manually-operated microcentrifuge (max rcf = 120×g). Yields for all centrifuges were similar. DNA extracted under simulated field conditions was similar in yield and quality to DNA extracted in the laboratory using the same equipment. CONCLUSIONS: This CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) DNA extraction method employs battery-operated and manually-operated equipment to isolate high quality DNA in the field. The method was tested on plant and fungus tissues, and may be adapted for other types of organisms. The method produced high quality DNA in laboratory tests and under simulated field conditions. The field extraction method should prove useful for working in remote sites, where ice, dry ice, and liquid nitrogen are unavailable; where degradation is likely to occur due to the long distances between the sample site and the laboratory; and in instances where other DNA preservation and transportation methods have been unsuccessful. It may be possible to adapt this method for genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic projects using samples collected in situ. BioMed Central 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3505157/ /pubmed/22672795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266 Text en Copyright ©2012 Abu Almakarem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Abu Almakarem, Amal S Heilman, Katie L Conger, Heather L Shtarkman, Yury M Rogers, Scott O Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title | Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title_full | Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title_fullStr | Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title_full_unstemmed | Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title_short | Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
title_sort | extraction of dna from plant and fungus tissues in situ |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abualmakaremamals extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu AT heilmankatiel extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu AT congerheatherl extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu AT shtarkmanyurym extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu AT rogersscotto extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu |