Cargando…

Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ

BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence informatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu Almakarem, Amal S, Heilman, Katie L, Conger, Heather L, Shtarkman, Yury M, Rogers, Scott O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266
_version_ 1782250721502035968
author Abu Almakarem, Amal S
Heilman, Katie L
Conger, Heather L
Shtarkman, Yury M
Rogers, Scott O
author_facet Abu Almakarem, Amal S
Heilman, Katie L
Conger, Heather L
Shtarkman, Yury M
Rogers, Scott O
author_sort Abu Almakarem, Amal S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence information. An extraction method to obtain high quality DNA in field studies is described. FINDINGS: DNA extracted immediately after sampling was compared to DNA extracted after allowing the sampled tissues to air dry at 21°C for 48 or 72 hours. While DNA extracted from fresh tissues exhibited little degradation, DNA extracted from all tissues exposed to 21°C air for 48 or 72 hours exhibited varying degrees of degradation. Yield was higher for extractions from fresh tissues in most cases. Four microcentrifuges were compared for DNA yield: one standard electric laboratory microcentrifuge (max rcf = 16,000×g), two battery-operated microcentrifuges (max rcf = 5,000 and 3,000 ×g), and one manually-operated microcentrifuge (max rcf = 120×g). Yields for all centrifuges were similar. DNA extracted under simulated field conditions was similar in yield and quality to DNA extracted in the laboratory using the same equipment. CONCLUSIONS: This CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) DNA extraction method employs battery-operated and manually-operated equipment to isolate high quality DNA in the field. The method was tested on plant and fungus tissues, and may be adapted for other types of organisms. The method produced high quality DNA in laboratory tests and under simulated field conditions. The field extraction method should prove useful for working in remote sites, where ice, dry ice, and liquid nitrogen are unavailable; where degradation is likely to occur due to the long distances between the sample site and the laboratory; and in instances where other DNA preservation and transportation methods have been unsuccessful. It may be possible to adapt this method for genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic projects using samples collected in situ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3505157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35051572012-11-24 Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ Abu Almakarem, Amal S Heilman, Katie L Conger, Heather L Shtarkman, Yury M Rogers, Scott O BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: When samples are collected in the field and transported to the lab, degradation of the nucleic acids contained in the samples is frequently observed. Immediate extraction and precipitation of the nucleic acids reduces degradation to a minimum, thus preserving accurate sequence information. An extraction method to obtain high quality DNA in field studies is described. FINDINGS: DNA extracted immediately after sampling was compared to DNA extracted after allowing the sampled tissues to air dry at 21°C for 48 or 72 hours. While DNA extracted from fresh tissues exhibited little degradation, DNA extracted from all tissues exposed to 21°C air for 48 or 72 hours exhibited varying degrees of degradation. Yield was higher for extractions from fresh tissues in most cases. Four microcentrifuges were compared for DNA yield: one standard electric laboratory microcentrifuge (max rcf = 16,000×g), two battery-operated microcentrifuges (max rcf = 5,000 and 3,000 ×g), and one manually-operated microcentrifuge (max rcf = 120×g). Yields for all centrifuges were similar. DNA extracted under simulated field conditions was similar in yield and quality to DNA extracted in the laboratory using the same equipment. CONCLUSIONS: This CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) DNA extraction method employs battery-operated and manually-operated equipment to isolate high quality DNA in the field. The method was tested on plant and fungus tissues, and may be adapted for other types of organisms. The method produced high quality DNA in laboratory tests and under simulated field conditions. The field extraction method should prove useful for working in remote sites, where ice, dry ice, and liquid nitrogen are unavailable; where degradation is likely to occur due to the long distances between the sample site and the laboratory; and in instances where other DNA preservation and transportation methods have been unsuccessful. It may be possible to adapt this method for genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic projects using samples collected in situ. BioMed Central 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3505157/ /pubmed/22672795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266 Text en Copyright ©2012 Abu Almakarem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Abu Almakarem, Amal S
Heilman, Katie L
Conger, Heather L
Shtarkman, Yury M
Rogers, Scott O
Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title_full Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title_fullStr Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title_full_unstemmed Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title_short Extraction of DNA from plant and fungus tissues in situ
title_sort extraction of dna from plant and fungus tissues in situ
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-266
work_keys_str_mv AT abualmakaremamals extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu
AT heilmankatiel extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu
AT congerheatherl extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu
AT shtarkmanyurym extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu
AT rogersscotto extractionofdnafromplantandfungustissuesinsitu