Cargando…

Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh

INTRODUCTION: In developing countries, reproductive tract infections (RTI) commonly affect the quality of life. Many reproductive tract infections including sexually transmitted infections (STI) and cervical cancers remain asymptomatic for long periods. Syndromic case management (SCM) is the mainsta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabha, M. L. S., Sasikala, G., Bala, Sudha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23188936
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2589-0557.102121
_version_ 1782250730884694016
author Prabha, M. L. S.
Sasikala, G.
Bala, Sudha
author_facet Prabha, M. L. S.
Sasikala, G.
Bala, Sudha
author_sort Prabha, M. L. S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In developing countries, reproductive tract infections (RTI) commonly affect the quality of life. Many reproductive tract infections including sexually transmitted infections (STI) and cervical cancers remain asymptomatic for long periods. Syndromic case management (SCM) is the mainstay in the control of RTI/STI, especially at primary level, where laboratory diagnosis is not possible. However, lab diagnosis should be used when it is available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistency of syndromic diagnosis with laboratory diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 407 women were screened. Women were categorized according to Syndromic Diagnosis of RTI/STI based on history and clinical examination. Microbiological tests and Pap smears were done to confirm the diagnosis and compared with Syndromic Diagnosis. RESULTS: Microbiologically, 33.14% were positive for at least one organism. Bacterial vaginosis was the most common finding (14%). Pap smear showed 32.9% inflammatory changes and 0.25% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Sensitivity and specificity of syndromic diagnosis with laboratory findings: Vaginal discharge syndrome with microbiological tests- (Se 58.9; Sp55.1%) Lower abdominal pain syndrome with microbiological tests-(Se 14.4%; Sp76.6%) CONCLUSION: The findings of this study highlight the wide variation of syndromic and laboratory diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3505286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35052862012-11-27 Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh Prabha, M. L. S. Sasikala, G. Bala, Sudha Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS Original Article INTRODUCTION: In developing countries, reproductive tract infections (RTI) commonly affect the quality of life. Many reproductive tract infections including sexually transmitted infections (STI) and cervical cancers remain asymptomatic for long periods. Syndromic case management (SCM) is the mainstay in the control of RTI/STI, especially at primary level, where laboratory diagnosis is not possible. However, lab diagnosis should be used when it is available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistency of syndromic diagnosis with laboratory diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 407 women were screened. Women were categorized according to Syndromic Diagnosis of RTI/STI based on history and clinical examination. Microbiological tests and Pap smears were done to confirm the diagnosis and compared with Syndromic Diagnosis. RESULTS: Microbiologically, 33.14% were positive for at least one organism. Bacterial vaginosis was the most common finding (14%). Pap smear showed 32.9% inflammatory changes and 0.25% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Sensitivity and specificity of syndromic diagnosis with laboratory findings: Vaginal discharge syndrome with microbiological tests- (Se 58.9; Sp55.1%) Lower abdominal pain syndrome with microbiological tests-(Se 14.4%; Sp76.6%) CONCLUSION: The findings of this study highlight the wide variation of syndromic and laboratory diagnosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3505286/ /pubmed/23188936 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2589-0557.102121 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prabha, M. L. S.
Sasikala, G.
Bala, Sudha
Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title_full Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title_fullStr Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title_short Comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in Medak district, Andhra Pradesh
title_sort comparison of syndromic diagnosis of reproductive tract infections with laboratory diagnosis among rural married women in medak district, andhra pradesh
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23188936
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2589-0557.102121
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhamls comparisonofsyndromicdiagnosisofreproductivetractinfectionswithlaboratorydiagnosisamongruralmarriedwomeninmedakdistrictandhrapradesh
AT sasikalag comparisonofsyndromicdiagnosisofreproductivetractinfectionswithlaboratorydiagnosisamongruralmarriedwomeninmedakdistrictandhrapradesh
AT balasudha comparisonofsyndromicdiagnosisofreproductivetractinfectionswithlaboratorydiagnosisamongruralmarriedwomeninmedakdistrictandhrapradesh