Cargando…

Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is a new endovascular stent designed for the treatment of challenging intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Its use has been extended to nonruptured and ruptured IAs of a variety of configurations and etiologies in both the anterior and posterior circulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, G. K. K., Tsang, A. C. O., Lui, W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0178-6
_version_ 1782250774780182528
author Leung, G. K. K.
Tsang, A. C. O.
Lui, W. M.
author_facet Leung, G. K. K.
Tsang, A. C. O.
Lui, W. M.
author_sort Leung, G. K. K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is a new endovascular stent designed for the treatment of challenging intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Its use has been extended to nonruptured and ruptured IAs of a variety of configurations and etiologies in both the anterior and posterior circulations. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of ten eligible reports on its clinical efficacy and safety. RESULTS: There were 414 patients with 448 IAs. The majority of the IAs were large (40.2 %), saccular or blister-like (78.3 %), and were located mostly in the anterior circulation (83.5 %). The regimens of antiplatelet therapy varied greatly between and within studies. The mean number of the PED used was 2.0 per IA. Deployment was successful in around 95 % of procedures. Aneurysm obliteration was achieved in 82.9 % of IAs at 6-month. The overall incidences of periprocedural intracranial vascular complication rate and mortality rate were 6.3 and 1.5 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: The PED is a safe and effective treatment for nonruptured IAs. Its use in the context of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) should be cautioned. Its main limitations include the need for prolonged antiplatelet therapy, as well as the potential risks of IA rupture and non-IA-related intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH). Future studies should aim at identifying factors that predispose to incomplete obliteration, delayed rupture, and thromboembolic complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3505532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35055322012-11-28 Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review Leung, G. K. K. Tsang, A. C. O. Lui, W. M. Clin Neuroradiol Review Article INTRODUCTION: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is a new endovascular stent designed for the treatment of challenging intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Its use has been extended to nonruptured and ruptured IAs of a variety of configurations and etiologies in both the anterior and posterior circulations. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of ten eligible reports on its clinical efficacy and safety. RESULTS: There were 414 patients with 448 IAs. The majority of the IAs were large (40.2 %), saccular or blister-like (78.3 %), and were located mostly in the anterior circulation (83.5 %). The regimens of antiplatelet therapy varied greatly between and within studies. The mean number of the PED used was 2.0 per IA. Deployment was successful in around 95 % of procedures. Aneurysm obliteration was achieved in 82.9 % of IAs at 6-month. The overall incidences of periprocedural intracranial vascular complication rate and mortality rate were 6.3 and 1.5 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: The PED is a safe and effective treatment for nonruptured IAs. Its use in the context of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) should be cautioned. Its main limitations include the need for prolonged antiplatelet therapy, as well as the potential risks of IA rupture and non-IA-related intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH). Future studies should aim at identifying factors that predispose to incomplete obliteration, delayed rupture, and thromboembolic complications. Springer-Verlag 2012-11-03 2012-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3505532/ /pubmed/23124329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0178-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2012
spellingShingle Review Article
Leung, G. K. K.
Tsang, A. C. O.
Lui, W. M.
Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title_full Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title_short Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
title_sort pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23124329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0178-6
work_keys_str_mv AT leunggkk pipelineembolizationdeviceforintracranialaneurysmasystematicreview
AT tsangaco pipelineembolizationdeviceforintracranialaneurysmasystematicreview
AT luiwm pipelineembolizationdeviceforintracranialaneurysmasystematicreview