Cargando…
Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease represents a major source of global mortality and morbidity. Imaging examinations play a critical role in the management of stroke patients, from establishing the initial diagnosis to determining and guiding further treatment. METHODS: In this article, current CT...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0185-9 |
_version_ | 1782250781097852928 |
---|---|
author | Vymazal, Josef Rulseh, Aaron M. Keller, Jiří Janouskova, Ladislava |
author_facet | Vymazal, Josef Rulseh, Aaron M. Keller, Jiří Janouskova, Ladislava |
author_sort | Vymazal, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease represents a major source of global mortality and morbidity. Imaging examinations play a critical role in the management of stroke patients, from establishing the initial diagnosis to determining and guiding further treatment. METHODS: In this article, current CT and MRI methods employed in the management of stroke patients are reviewed, with an emphasis on ischemic stroke. RESULTS: The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed, a number of cases emphasizing key points are presented, and a comparison between modern CT and MRI techniques is outlined. CONCLUSION: The major drawback of CT is the high radiation dose, while in MRI it is the more complicated and time-consuming aspect of the examination. MAIN MESSAGES: • Cerebrovascular disease represents a major source of global mortality and morbidity • Imaging examinations play a critical role in the management of stroke patients • The penumbra may be seen with both CT and MRI; however, this concept may be overly simplistic • The major drawback of CT is the high radiation dose, while MRI is a more complicated examination |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3505566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35055662012-12-06 Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke Vymazal, Josef Rulseh, Aaron M. Keller, Jiří Janouskova, Ladislava Insights Imaging Pictorial Review BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease represents a major source of global mortality and morbidity. Imaging examinations play a critical role in the management of stroke patients, from establishing the initial diagnosis to determining and guiding further treatment. METHODS: In this article, current CT and MRI methods employed in the management of stroke patients are reviewed, with an emphasis on ischemic stroke. RESULTS: The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed, a number of cases emphasizing key points are presented, and a comparison between modern CT and MRI techniques is outlined. CONCLUSION: The major drawback of CT is the high radiation dose, while in MRI it is the more complicated and time-consuming aspect of the examination. MAIN MESSAGES: • Cerebrovascular disease represents a major source of global mortality and morbidity • Imaging examinations play a critical role in the management of stroke patients • The penumbra may be seen with both CT and MRI; however, this concept may be overly simplistic • The major drawback of CT is the high radiation dose, while MRI is a more complicated examination Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3505566/ /pubmed/23055115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0185-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Pictorial Review Vymazal, Josef Rulseh, Aaron M. Keller, Jiří Janouskova, Ladislava Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title | Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title_full | Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title_fullStr | Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title_short | Comparison of CT and MR imaging in ischemic stroke |
title_sort | comparison of ct and mr imaging in ischemic stroke |
topic | Pictorial Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0185-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vymazaljosef comparisonofctandmrimaginginischemicstroke AT rulsehaaronm comparisonofctandmrimaginginischemicstroke AT kellerjiri comparisonofctandmrimaginginischemicstroke AT janouskovaladislava comparisonofctandmrimaginginischemicstroke |