Cargando…

Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT

BACKGROUND: A pilot project cardiovascular prevention was implemented in Sandwell (West Midlands, UK). This used electronic primary care records to identify untreated patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease then invited these high risk patients for assessment by a nurse in their own general...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Tom, Caley, Michael, Hemming, Karla, Gill, Paramjit, Gale, Nicola, Jolly, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23101763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-908
_version_ 1782250804062715904
author Marshall, Tom
Caley, Michael
Hemming, Karla
Gill, Paramjit
Gale, Nicola
Jolly, Kate
author_facet Marshall, Tom
Caley, Michael
Hemming, Karla
Gill, Paramjit
Gale, Nicola
Jolly, Kate
author_sort Marshall, Tom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A pilot project cardiovascular prevention was implemented in Sandwell (West Midlands, UK). This used electronic primary care records to identify untreated patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease then invited these high risk patients for assessment by a nurse in their own general practice. Those found to be eligible for treatment were offered treatment. During the pilot a higher proportion of high risk patients were started on treatment in the intervention practices than in control practices. Following the apparent success of the prevention project, it was intended to extend the service to all practices across the Sandwell area. However the pilot project was not a robust evaluation. There was a need for an efficient evaluation that would not disrupt the planned rollout of the project. METHODS/DESIGN: Project nurses will sequentially implement targeted cardiovascular case finding in a phased way across all general practices, with the sequence of general practices determined randomly. This is a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial design. The target population is patients aged 35 to 74, without diabetes or cardiovascular disease whose ten-year cardiovascular risk, (determined from data in their electronic records) is ≥20%. The primary outcome is the number of high risk patients started on treatment, because these data could be efficiently obtained from electronic primary care records. From this we can determine the effects of the case finding programme on the proportion of high risk patients started on treatment in practices before and after implementation of targeted case finding. Cost-effectiveness will be modelled from the predicted effects of treatments on cardiovascular events and associated health service costs. Alongside the implementation it is intended to interview clinical staff and patients who participated in the programme in order to determine acceptability to patients and clinicians. Practical considerations meant that 26 practices in Sandwell could be randomised, including about 6,250 patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. This gives sufficient power for evaluation. DISCUSSION: It is possible to design a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial using routine data to determine the primary outcome to evaluate implementation of a cardiovascular prevention programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3505746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35057462012-11-26 Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT Marshall, Tom Caley, Michael Hemming, Karla Gill, Paramjit Gale, Nicola Jolly, Kate BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A pilot project cardiovascular prevention was implemented in Sandwell (West Midlands, UK). This used electronic primary care records to identify untreated patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease then invited these high risk patients for assessment by a nurse in their own general practice. Those found to be eligible for treatment were offered treatment. During the pilot a higher proportion of high risk patients were started on treatment in the intervention practices than in control practices. Following the apparent success of the prevention project, it was intended to extend the service to all practices across the Sandwell area. However the pilot project was not a robust evaluation. There was a need for an efficient evaluation that would not disrupt the planned rollout of the project. METHODS/DESIGN: Project nurses will sequentially implement targeted cardiovascular case finding in a phased way across all general practices, with the sequence of general practices determined randomly. This is a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial design. The target population is patients aged 35 to 74, without diabetes or cardiovascular disease whose ten-year cardiovascular risk, (determined from data in their electronic records) is ≥20%. The primary outcome is the number of high risk patients started on treatment, because these data could be efficiently obtained from electronic primary care records. From this we can determine the effects of the case finding programme on the proportion of high risk patients started on treatment in practices before and after implementation of targeted case finding. Cost-effectiveness will be modelled from the predicted effects of treatments on cardiovascular events and associated health service costs. Alongside the implementation it is intended to interview clinical staff and patients who participated in the programme in order to determine acceptability to patients and clinicians. Practical considerations meant that 26 practices in Sandwell could be randomised, including about 6,250 patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. This gives sufficient power for evaluation. DISCUSSION: It is possible to design a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial using routine data to determine the primary outcome to evaluate implementation of a cardiovascular prevention programme. BioMed Central 2012-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3505746/ /pubmed/23101763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-908 Text en Copyright ©2012 Marshall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Marshall, Tom
Caley, Michael
Hemming, Karla
Gill, Paramjit
Gale, Nicola
Jolly, Kate
Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title_full Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title_fullStr Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title_full_unstemmed Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title_short Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster rct
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23101763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-908
work_keys_str_mv AT marshalltom mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct
AT caleymichael mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct
AT hemmingkarla mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct
AT gillparamjit mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct
AT galenicola mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct
AT jollykate mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedcasefindingforcardiovasculardiseasepreventionusingasteppedwedgedclusterrct