Cargando…

Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations

BACKGROUND: Simulation studies have shown that accuracy and genetic gain are increased in genomic selection schemes compared to traditional aquaculture sib-based schemes. In genomic selection, accuracy of selection can be maximized by increasing the precision of the estimation of SNP effects and by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nirea, Kahsay G, Sonesson, Anna K, Woolliams, John A, Meuwissen, Theo HE
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-30
_version_ 1782250903866179584
author Nirea, Kahsay G
Sonesson, Anna K
Woolliams, John A
Meuwissen, Theo HE
author_facet Nirea, Kahsay G
Sonesson, Anna K
Woolliams, John A
Meuwissen, Theo HE
author_sort Nirea, Kahsay G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simulation studies have shown that accuracy and genetic gain are increased in genomic selection schemes compared to traditional aquaculture sib-based schemes. In genomic selection, accuracy of selection can be maximized by increasing the precision of the estimation of SNP effects and by maximizing the relationships between test sibs and candidate sibs. Another means of increasing the accuracy of the estimation of SNP effects is to create individuals in the test population with extreme genotypes. The latter approach was studied here with creation of double haploids and use of non-random mating designs. METHODS: Six alternative breeding schemes were simulated in which the design of the test population was varied: test sibs inherited maternal (Mat), paternal (Pat) or a mixture of maternal and paternal (MatPat) double haploid genomes or test sibs were obtained by maximum coancestry mating (MaxC), minimum coancestry mating (MinC), or random (RAND) mating. Three thousand test sibs and 3000 candidate sibs were genotyped. The test sibs were recorded for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates and were used to estimate SNP effects. Selection was done by truncation on genome-wide estimated breeding values and 100 individuals were selected as parents each generation, equally divided between both sexes. RESULTS: Results showed a 7 to 19% increase in selection accuracy and a 6 to 22% increase in genetic gain in the MatPat scheme compared to the RAND scheme. These increases were greater with lower heritabilities. Among all other scenarios, i.e. Mat, Pat, MaxC, and MinC, no substantial differences in selection accuracy and genetic gain were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a test population designed with a mixture of paternal and maternal double haploids, i.e. the MatPat scheme, increases substantially the accuracy of selection and genetic gain. This will be particularly interesting for traits that cannot be recorded on the selection candidates and require the use of sib tests, such as disease resistance and meat quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3506447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35064472012-11-29 Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations Nirea, Kahsay G Sonesson, Anna K Woolliams, John A Meuwissen, Theo HE Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Simulation studies have shown that accuracy and genetic gain are increased in genomic selection schemes compared to traditional aquaculture sib-based schemes. In genomic selection, accuracy of selection can be maximized by increasing the precision of the estimation of SNP effects and by maximizing the relationships between test sibs and candidate sibs. Another means of increasing the accuracy of the estimation of SNP effects is to create individuals in the test population with extreme genotypes. The latter approach was studied here with creation of double haploids and use of non-random mating designs. METHODS: Six alternative breeding schemes were simulated in which the design of the test population was varied: test sibs inherited maternal (Mat), paternal (Pat) or a mixture of maternal and paternal (MatPat) double haploid genomes or test sibs were obtained by maximum coancestry mating (MaxC), minimum coancestry mating (MinC), or random (RAND) mating. Three thousand test sibs and 3000 candidate sibs were genotyped. The test sibs were recorded for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates and were used to estimate SNP effects. Selection was done by truncation on genome-wide estimated breeding values and 100 individuals were selected as parents each generation, equally divided between both sexes. RESULTS: Results showed a 7 to 19% increase in selection accuracy and a 6 to 22% increase in genetic gain in the MatPat scheme compared to the RAND scheme. These increases were greater with lower heritabilities. Among all other scenarios, i.e. Mat, Pat, MaxC, and MinC, no substantial differences in selection accuracy and genetic gain were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a test population designed with a mixture of paternal and maternal double haploids, i.e. the MatPat scheme, increases substantially the accuracy of selection and genetic gain. This will be particularly interesting for traits that cannot be recorded on the selection candidates and require the use of sib tests, such as disease resistance and meat quality. BioMed Central 2012-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3506447/ /pubmed/23110512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-30 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nirea et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nirea, Kahsay G
Sonesson, Anna K
Woolliams, John A
Meuwissen, Theo HE
Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title_full Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title_fullStr Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title_short Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
title_sort strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-30
work_keys_str_mv AT nireakahsayg strategiesforimplementinggenomicselectioninfamilybasedaquaculturebreedingschemesdoublehaploidsibtestpopulations
AT sonessonannak strategiesforimplementinggenomicselectioninfamilybasedaquaculturebreedingschemesdoublehaploidsibtestpopulations
AT woolliamsjohna strategiesforimplementinggenomicselectioninfamilybasedaquaculturebreedingschemesdoublehaploidsibtestpopulations
AT meuwissentheohe strategiesforimplementinggenomicselectioninfamilybasedaquaculturebreedingschemesdoublehaploidsibtestpopulations