Cargando…

The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that women have greater mobility disability than men. The goals of this research were: 1) to assess the gender gap in mobility difficulty in 70 countries; 2) to determine whether the gender gap is explained by sociodemographic and health factors; 3) to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa, Freeman, Ellen E, Haddad, Slim, Samson, Elodie, Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22856611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-598
_version_ 1782250923309924352
author Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa
Freeman, Ellen E
Haddad, Slim
Samson, Elodie
Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria
author_facet Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa
Freeman, Ellen E
Haddad, Slim
Samson, Elodie
Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria
author_sort Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that women have greater mobility disability than men. The goals of this research were: 1) to assess the gender gap in mobility difficulty in 70 countries; 2) to determine whether the gender gap is explained by sociodemographic and health factors; 3) to determine whether the gender gap differs across 6 regions of the world with different degrees of gender equality according to United Nations data. METHODS: Population-based data were used from the World Health Survey (WHS) conducted in 70 countries throughout the world. 276,647 adults aged 18 years and over were recruited from 6 world regions. Mobility was measured by asking the level of difficulty people had moving around in the last 30 days and then creating a dichotomous measure (no difficulty, difficulty). The human development index and the gender-related development index for each country were obtained from the United Nations Development Program website. Poisson regression with Taylor series linearized variance estimation was used. RESULTS: Women were more likely than men to report mobility difficulty (38% versus 27%, P < 0.0001). The age-adjusted prevalence rate ratio for female gender was 1.35 (95% CI 1.31–1.38). The addition of education, marital status, and urban versus rural setting reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.30 (95% CI 1.26–1.33). The addition of the presence of back pain, arthritis, angina, depressive symptoms, and cognitive difficulties further reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.12 (95% CI 1.09–1.15). There was statistical interaction on the multiplicative scale between female gender and region (P < 0.01). The Eastern Mediterranean region, which had the greatest loss of human development due to gender inequality, showed the largest gender gap in mobility difficulty, while the Western Pacific region, with the smallest loss of human development due to gender inequality, had the smallest gender gap in mobility difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first world-wide data to examine the gender gap in mobility. Differences in chronic diseases are the main reasons for this gender gap. The gender gap seems to be greater in regions with the largest loss of human development due to gender inequality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3506530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35065302012-11-27 The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa Freeman, Ellen E Haddad, Slim Samson, Elodie Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that women have greater mobility disability than men. The goals of this research were: 1) to assess the gender gap in mobility difficulty in 70 countries; 2) to determine whether the gender gap is explained by sociodemographic and health factors; 3) to determine whether the gender gap differs across 6 regions of the world with different degrees of gender equality according to United Nations data. METHODS: Population-based data were used from the World Health Survey (WHS) conducted in 70 countries throughout the world. 276,647 adults aged 18 years and over were recruited from 6 world regions. Mobility was measured by asking the level of difficulty people had moving around in the last 30 days and then creating a dichotomous measure (no difficulty, difficulty). The human development index and the gender-related development index for each country were obtained from the United Nations Development Program website. Poisson regression with Taylor series linearized variance estimation was used. RESULTS: Women were more likely than men to report mobility difficulty (38% versus 27%, P < 0.0001). The age-adjusted prevalence rate ratio for female gender was 1.35 (95% CI 1.31–1.38). The addition of education, marital status, and urban versus rural setting reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.30 (95% CI 1.26–1.33). The addition of the presence of back pain, arthritis, angina, depressive symptoms, and cognitive difficulties further reduced the prevalence rate ratio to 1.12 (95% CI 1.09–1.15). There was statistical interaction on the multiplicative scale between female gender and region (P < 0.01). The Eastern Mediterranean region, which had the greatest loss of human development due to gender inequality, showed the largest gender gap in mobility difficulty, while the Western Pacific region, with the smallest loss of human development due to gender inequality, had the smallest gender gap in mobility difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first world-wide data to examine the gender gap in mobility. Differences in chronic diseases are the main reasons for this gender gap. The gender gap seems to be greater in regions with the largest loss of human development due to gender inequality. BioMed Central 2012-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3506530/ /pubmed/22856611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-598 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mechakra-Tahiri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mechakra-Tahiri, Samia Djemâa
Freeman, Ellen E
Haddad, Slim
Samson, Elodie
Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria
The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title_full The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title_short The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional study
title_sort gender gap in mobility: a global cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22856611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-598
work_keys_str_mv AT mechakratahirisamiadjemaa thegendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT freemanellene thegendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT haddadslim thegendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT samsonelodie thegendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT zunzuneguimariavictoria thegendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT mechakratahirisamiadjemaa gendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT freemanellene gendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT haddadslim gendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT samsonelodie gendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy
AT zunzuneguimariavictoria gendergapinmobilityaglobalcrosssectionalstudy