Cargando…

Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocheleau, Carissa M, Romitti, Paul A, Sherlock, Stacey Hockett, Sanderson, Wayne T, Bell, Erin M, Druschel, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579
_version_ 1782250923543756800
author Rocheleau, Carissa M
Romitti, Paul A
Sherlock, Stacey Hockett
Sanderson, Wayne T
Bell, Erin M
Druschel, Charlotte
author_facet Rocheleau, Carissa M
Romitti, Paul A
Sherlock, Stacey Hockett
Sanderson, Wayne T
Bell, Erin M
Druschel, Charlotte
author_sort Rocheleau, Carissa M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephone survey conducted as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 392 eligible mothers to receive a self-administered, mailed questionnaire (MQ) or a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) using similar recruitment protocols. If mothers gave permission to contact the fathers, fathers were recruited to complete the same instrument (MQ or CATI) as mothers. RESULTS: Mothers contacted for the MQ, within all demographic strata examined, were more likely to participate than those contacted for the CATI (86.6% vs. 70.6%). The median response time for mothers completing the MQ was 17 days, compared to 29 days for mothers completing the CATI. Mothers completing the MQ also required fewer reminder calls or letters to finish participation versus those assigned to the CATI (median 3 versus 6), though they were less likely to give permission to contact the father (75.0% vs. 85.8%). Fathers contacted for the MQ, however, had higher participation compared to fathers contacted for the CATI (85.2% vs. 54.5%). Fathers recruited to the MQ also had a shorter response time (median 17 days) and required fewer reminder calls and letters (median 3 reminders) than those completing the CATI (medians 28 days and 6 reminders). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that offering a MQ substantially improved participation rates and reduced recruitment effort compared to a CATI in this study. While a CATI has the advantage of being able to clarify answers to complex questions or eligibility requirements, our experience suggests that a MQ might be a good survey option for some studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3506531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35065312012-11-27 Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview Rocheleau, Carissa M Romitti, Paul A Sherlock, Stacey Hockett Sanderson, Wayne T Bell, Erin M Druschel, Charlotte BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephone survey conducted as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 392 eligible mothers to receive a self-administered, mailed questionnaire (MQ) or a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) using similar recruitment protocols. If mothers gave permission to contact the fathers, fathers were recruited to complete the same instrument (MQ or CATI) as mothers. RESULTS: Mothers contacted for the MQ, within all demographic strata examined, were more likely to participate than those contacted for the CATI (86.6% vs. 70.6%). The median response time for mothers completing the MQ was 17 days, compared to 29 days for mothers completing the CATI. Mothers completing the MQ also required fewer reminder calls or letters to finish participation versus those assigned to the CATI (median 3 versus 6), though they were less likely to give permission to contact the father (75.0% vs. 85.8%). Fathers contacted for the MQ, however, had higher participation compared to fathers contacted for the CATI (85.2% vs. 54.5%). Fathers recruited to the MQ also had a shorter response time (median 17 days) and required fewer reminder calls and letters (median 3 reminders) than those completing the CATI (medians 28 days and 6 reminders). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that offering a MQ substantially improved participation rates and reduced recruitment effort compared to a CATI in this study. While a CATI has the advantage of being able to clarify answers to complex questions or eligibility requirements, our experience suggests that a MQ might be a good survey option for some studies. BioMed Central 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3506531/ /pubmed/22849754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rocheleau et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rocheleau, Carissa M
Romitti, Paul A
Sherlock, Stacey Hockett
Sanderson, Wayne T
Bell, Erin M
Druschel, Charlotte
Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title_full Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title_fullStr Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title_full_unstemmed Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title_short Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
title_sort effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579
work_keys_str_mv AT rocheleaucarissam effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview
AT romittipaula effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview
AT sherlockstaceyhockett effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview
AT sandersonwaynet effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview
AT bellerinm effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview
AT druschelcharlotte effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview