Cargando…
Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview
BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579 |
_version_ | 1782250923543756800 |
---|---|
author | Rocheleau, Carissa M Romitti, Paul A Sherlock, Stacey Hockett Sanderson, Wayne T Bell, Erin M Druschel, Charlotte |
author_facet | Rocheleau, Carissa M Romitti, Paul A Sherlock, Stacey Hockett Sanderson, Wayne T Bell, Erin M Druschel, Charlotte |
author_sort | Rocheleau, Carissa M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephone survey conducted as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 392 eligible mothers to receive a self-administered, mailed questionnaire (MQ) or a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) using similar recruitment protocols. If mothers gave permission to contact the fathers, fathers were recruited to complete the same instrument (MQ or CATI) as mothers. RESULTS: Mothers contacted for the MQ, within all demographic strata examined, were more likely to participate than those contacted for the CATI (86.6% vs. 70.6%). The median response time for mothers completing the MQ was 17 days, compared to 29 days for mothers completing the CATI. Mothers completing the MQ also required fewer reminder calls or letters to finish participation versus those assigned to the CATI (median 3 versus 6), though they were less likely to give permission to contact the father (75.0% vs. 85.8%). Fathers contacted for the MQ, however, had higher participation compared to fathers contacted for the CATI (85.2% vs. 54.5%). Fathers recruited to the MQ also had a shorter response time (median 17 days) and required fewer reminder calls and letters (median 3 reminders) than those completing the CATI (medians 28 days and 6 reminders). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that offering a MQ substantially improved participation rates and reduced recruitment effort compared to a CATI in this study. While a CATI has the advantage of being able to clarify answers to complex questions or eligibility requirements, our experience suggests that a MQ might be a good survey option for some studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3506531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35065312012-11-27 Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview Rocheleau, Carissa M Romitti, Paul A Sherlock, Stacey Hockett Sanderson, Wayne T Bell, Erin M Druschel, Charlotte BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological and public health surveys report increasing difficulty obtaining high participation rates. We conducted a pilot follow-up study to determine whether a mailed or telephone survey would better facilitate data collection in a subset of respondents to an earlier telephone survey conducted as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 392 eligible mothers to receive a self-administered, mailed questionnaire (MQ) or a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) using similar recruitment protocols. If mothers gave permission to contact the fathers, fathers were recruited to complete the same instrument (MQ or CATI) as mothers. RESULTS: Mothers contacted for the MQ, within all demographic strata examined, were more likely to participate than those contacted for the CATI (86.6% vs. 70.6%). The median response time for mothers completing the MQ was 17 days, compared to 29 days for mothers completing the CATI. Mothers completing the MQ also required fewer reminder calls or letters to finish participation versus those assigned to the CATI (median 3 versus 6), though they were less likely to give permission to contact the father (75.0% vs. 85.8%). Fathers contacted for the MQ, however, had higher participation compared to fathers contacted for the CATI (85.2% vs. 54.5%). Fathers recruited to the MQ also had a shorter response time (median 17 days) and required fewer reminder calls and letters (median 3 reminders) than those completing the CATI (medians 28 days and 6 reminders). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that offering a MQ substantially improved participation rates and reduced recruitment effort compared to a CATI in this study. While a CATI has the advantage of being able to clarify answers to complex questions or eligibility requirements, our experience suggests that a MQ might be a good survey option for some studies. BioMed Central 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3506531/ /pubmed/22849754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rocheleau et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rocheleau, Carissa M Romitti, Paul A Sherlock, Stacey Hockett Sanderson, Wayne T Bell, Erin M Druschel, Charlotte Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title | Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title_full | Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title_fullStr | Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title_short | Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
title_sort | effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rocheleaucarissam effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview AT romittipaula effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview AT sherlockstaceyhockett effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview AT sandersonwaynet effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview AT bellerinm effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview AT druschelcharlotte effectofsurveyinstrumentonparticipationinafollowupstudyarandomizationstudyofamailedquestionnaireversusacomputerassistedtelephoneinterview |