Cargando…
Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the ex...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23205009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316 |
_version_ | 1782250990674640896 |
---|---|
author | Gruss, L. Forest Wieser, Matthias J. Schweinberger, Stefan R. Keil, Andreas |
author_facet | Gruss, L. Forest Wieser, Matthias J. Schweinberger, Stefan R. Keil, Andreas |
author_sort | Gruss, L. Forest |
collection | PubMed |
description | Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the extent to which repetitive lower-level visual cortical engagement, reflected in flicker steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), shows similar amplitude enhancement to face inversion. We also asked if inversion-related ssVEP modulation would be dependent on the stimulation rate at which upright and inverted faces were flickered. To this end, multiple tagging frequencies were used (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz) across two studies (n = 21, n = 18). Results showed that amplitude enhancement of the ssVEP for inverted faces was found solely at higher stimulation frequencies (15 and 20 Hz). By contrast, lower frequency ssVEPs did not show this inversion effect. These findings suggest that stimulation frequency affects the sensitivity of ssVEPs to face inversion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3506985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35069852012-11-30 Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion Gruss, L. Forest Wieser, Matthias J. Schweinberger, Stefan R. Keil, Andreas Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the extent to which repetitive lower-level visual cortical engagement, reflected in flicker steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), shows similar amplitude enhancement to face inversion. We also asked if inversion-related ssVEP modulation would be dependent on the stimulation rate at which upright and inverted faces were flickered. To this end, multiple tagging frequencies were used (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz) across two studies (n = 21, n = 18). Results showed that amplitude enhancement of the ssVEP for inverted faces was found solely at higher stimulation frequencies (15 and 20 Hz). By contrast, lower frequency ssVEPs did not show this inversion effect. These findings suggest that stimulation frequency affects the sensitivity of ssVEPs to face inversion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3506985/ /pubmed/23205009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316 Text en Copyright © 2012 Gruss, Wieser, Schweinberger and Keil. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Gruss, L. Forest Wieser, Matthias J. Schweinberger, Stefan R. Keil, Andreas Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title | Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title_full | Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title_fullStr | Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title_full_unstemmed | Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title_short | Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion |
title_sort | face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23205009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grusslforest faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion AT wiesermatthiasj faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion AT schweinbergerstefanr faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion AT keilandreas faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion |