Cargando…

Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion

Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruss, L. Forest, Wieser, Matthias J., Schweinberger, Stefan R., Keil, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23205009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316
_version_ 1782250990674640896
author Gruss, L. Forest
Wieser, Matthias J.
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
Keil, Andreas
author_facet Gruss, L. Forest
Wieser, Matthias J.
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
Keil, Andreas
author_sort Gruss, L. Forest
collection PubMed
description Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the extent to which repetitive lower-level visual cortical engagement, reflected in flicker steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), shows similar amplitude enhancement to face inversion. We also asked if inversion-related ssVEP modulation would be dependent on the stimulation rate at which upright and inverted faces were flickered. To this end, multiple tagging frequencies were used (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz) across two studies (n = 21, n = 18). Results showed that amplitude enhancement of the ssVEP for inverted faces was found solely at higher stimulation frequencies (15 and 20 Hz). By contrast, lower frequency ssVEPs did not show this inversion effect. These findings suggest that stimulation frequency affects the sensitivity of ssVEPs to face inversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3506985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35069852012-11-30 Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion Gruss, L. Forest Wieser, Matthias J. Schweinberger, Stefan R. Keil, Andreas Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Face processing can be explored using electrophysiological methods. Research with event-related potentials has demonstrated the so-called face inversion effect, in which the N170 component is enhanced in amplitude and latency to inverted, compared to upright, faces. The present study explored the extent to which repetitive lower-level visual cortical engagement, reflected in flicker steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), shows similar amplitude enhancement to face inversion. We also asked if inversion-related ssVEP modulation would be dependent on the stimulation rate at which upright and inverted faces were flickered. To this end, multiple tagging frequencies were used (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz) across two studies (n = 21, n = 18). Results showed that amplitude enhancement of the ssVEP for inverted faces was found solely at higher stimulation frequencies (15 and 20 Hz). By contrast, lower frequency ssVEPs did not show this inversion effect. These findings suggest that stimulation frequency affects the sensitivity of ssVEPs to face inversion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3506985/ /pubmed/23205009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316 Text en Copyright © 2012 Gruss, Wieser, Schweinberger and Keil. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Gruss, L. Forest
Wieser, Matthias J.
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
Keil, Andreas
Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title_full Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title_fullStr Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title_full_unstemmed Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title_short Face-Evoked Steady-State Visual Potentials: Effects of Presentation Rate and Face Inversion
title_sort face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3506985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23205009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316
work_keys_str_mv AT grusslforest faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion
AT wiesermatthiasj faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion
AT schweinbergerstefanr faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion
AT keilandreas faceevokedsteadystatevisualpotentialseffectsofpresentationrateandfaceinversion