Cargando…

One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs

In brachiation, two main gaits are distinguished, ricochetal brachiation and continuous contact brachiation. During ricochetal brachiation, a flight phase exists and the body centre of mass (bCOM) describes a parabolic trajectory. For continuous contact brachiation, where at least one hand is always...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michilsens, Fana, D'Août, Kristiaan, Vereecke, Evie E., Aerts, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23213432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.2012588
_version_ 1782251040944422912
author Michilsens, Fana
D'Août, Kristiaan
Vereecke, Evie E.
Aerts, Peter
author_facet Michilsens, Fana
D'Août, Kristiaan
Vereecke, Evie E.
Aerts, Peter
author_sort Michilsens, Fana
collection PubMed
description In brachiation, two main gaits are distinguished, ricochetal brachiation and continuous contact brachiation. During ricochetal brachiation, a flight phase exists and the body centre of mass (bCOM) describes a parabolic trajectory. For continuous contact brachiation, where at least one hand is always in contact with the substrate, we showed in an earlier paper that four step-to-step transition types occur. We referred to these as a ‘point’, a ‘loop’, a ‘backward pendulum’ and a ‘parabolic’ transition. Only the first two transition types have previously been mentioned in the existing literature on gibbon brachiation. In the current study, we used three-dimensional video and force analysis to describe and characterize these four step-to-step transition types. Results show that, although individual preference occurs, the brachiation strides characterized by each transition type are mainly associated with speed. Yet, these four transitions seem to form a continuum rather than four distinct types. Energy recovery and collision fraction are used as estimators of mechanical efficiency of brachiation and, remarkably, these parameters do not differ between strides with different transition types. All strides show high energy recoveries (mean  = 70±11.4%) and low collision fractions (mean  = 0.2±0.13), regardless of the step-to-step transition type used. We conclude that siamangs have efficient means of modifying locomotor speed during continuous contact brachiation by choosing particular step-to-step transition types, which all minimize collision fraction and enhance energy recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3507214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Company of Biologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35072142012-12-04 One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs Michilsens, Fana D'Août, Kristiaan Vereecke, Evie E. Aerts, Peter Biol Open Research Article In brachiation, two main gaits are distinguished, ricochetal brachiation and continuous contact brachiation. During ricochetal brachiation, a flight phase exists and the body centre of mass (bCOM) describes a parabolic trajectory. For continuous contact brachiation, where at least one hand is always in contact with the substrate, we showed in an earlier paper that four step-to-step transition types occur. We referred to these as a ‘point’, a ‘loop’, a ‘backward pendulum’ and a ‘parabolic’ transition. Only the first two transition types have previously been mentioned in the existing literature on gibbon brachiation. In the current study, we used three-dimensional video and force analysis to describe and characterize these four step-to-step transition types. Results show that, although individual preference occurs, the brachiation strides characterized by each transition type are mainly associated with speed. Yet, these four transitions seem to form a continuum rather than four distinct types. Energy recovery and collision fraction are used as estimators of mechanical efficiency of brachiation and, remarkably, these parameters do not differ between strides with different transition types. All strides show high energy recoveries (mean  = 70±11.4%) and low collision fractions (mean  = 0.2±0.13), regardless of the step-to-step transition type used. We conclude that siamangs have efficient means of modifying locomotor speed during continuous contact brachiation by choosing particular step-to-step transition types, which all minimize collision fraction and enhance energy recovery. The Company of Biologists 2012-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3507214/ /pubmed/23213432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.2012588 Text en © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Michilsens, Fana
D'Août, Kristiaan
Vereecke, Evie E.
Aerts, Peter
One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title_full One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title_fullStr One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title_full_unstemmed One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title_short One step beyond: Different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
title_sort one step beyond: different step-to-step transitions exist during continuous contact brachiation in siamangs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23213432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.2012588
work_keys_str_mv AT michilsensfana onestepbeyonddifferentsteptosteptransitionsexistduringcontinuouscontactbrachiationinsiamangs
AT daoutkristiaan onestepbeyonddifferentsteptosteptransitionsexistduringcontinuouscontactbrachiationinsiamangs
AT vereeckeeviee onestepbeyonddifferentsteptosteptransitionsexistduringcontinuouscontactbrachiationinsiamangs
AT aertspeter onestepbeyonddifferentsteptosteptransitionsexistduringcontinuouscontactbrachiationinsiamangs