Cargando…

Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi

This study was conducted with the aim to compare two batches each of four popular commercial formulations of Bacopa monnieri (Brahmi), and report, if any, inter-batch variations. The formulations were procured from local market and analyzed for label specifications, uniformity of weight of capsule,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saini, Neeti, Mathur, Rajani, Agrawal, S. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.102539
_version_ 1782251062304964608
author Saini, Neeti
Mathur, Rajani
Agrawal, S. S.
author_facet Saini, Neeti
Mathur, Rajani
Agrawal, S. S.
author_sort Saini, Neeti
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted with the aim to compare two batches each of four popular commercial formulations of Bacopa monnieri (Brahmi), and report, if any, inter-batch variations. The formulations were procured from local market and analyzed for label specifications, uniformity of weight of capsule, identity, purity and strength parameters (total ash content test, acid insoluble ash content, water soluble extractive, alcohol soluble extractive, loss on drying). Bacoside A, one of the pharmacologically active saponin present in B. monnieri, was quantified in all the formulations using UV-spectrophotometer. In addition each formulation was assessed and compared for variation in biological activity using in vitro test for hemolytic activity using human erythrocytes. The results of the study show that there is a wide variation in the quality and content of herbal drugs marketed by different manufacturers. More importantly this study demonstrates that there exists a bigger challenge of batch-to-batch variation in the quality and content of herbal formulations of the same manufacturer. This challenge of providing standardized formulations is being faced by not any one manufacturing house but by all, and may be attributed firstly to, lack of stringent regulations and secondly to high variability in raw material quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3507341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35073412012-11-30 Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi Saini, Neeti Mathur, Rajani Agrawal, S. S. Indian J Pharm Sci Research Paper This study was conducted with the aim to compare two batches each of four popular commercial formulations of Bacopa monnieri (Brahmi), and report, if any, inter-batch variations. The formulations were procured from local market and analyzed for label specifications, uniformity of weight of capsule, identity, purity and strength parameters (total ash content test, acid insoluble ash content, water soluble extractive, alcohol soluble extractive, loss on drying). Bacoside A, one of the pharmacologically active saponin present in B. monnieri, was quantified in all the formulations using UV-spectrophotometer. In addition each formulation was assessed and compared for variation in biological activity using in vitro test for hemolytic activity using human erythrocytes. The results of the study show that there is a wide variation in the quality and content of herbal drugs marketed by different manufacturers. More importantly this study demonstrates that there exists a bigger challenge of batch-to-batch variation in the quality and content of herbal formulations of the same manufacturer. This challenge of providing standardized formulations is being faced by not any one manufacturing house but by all, and may be attributed firstly to, lack of stringent regulations and secondly to high variability in raw material quality. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3507341/ /pubmed/23204618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.102539 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Saini, Neeti
Mathur, Rajani
Agrawal, S. S.
Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title_full Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title_fullStr Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title_short Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Four Marketed Formulations of Brahmi
title_sort qualitative and quantitative assessment of four marketed formulations of brahmi
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.102539
work_keys_str_mv AT sainineeti qualitativeandquantitativeassessmentoffourmarketedformulationsofbrahmi
AT mathurrajani qualitativeandquantitativeassessmentoffourmarketedformulationsofbrahmi
AT agrawalss qualitativeandquantitativeassessmentoffourmarketedformulationsofbrahmi