Cargando…

Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies link both depressive symptoms (DS) and diabetes-related distress (DRD) to diabetes self-management and/or glycemic control. However, longitudinal studies of these variables are rare, and their results are somewhat conflicting. The study objective was to compare DS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aikens, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033244
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0181
_version_ 1782251084952109056
author Aikens, James E.
author_facet Aikens, James E.
author_sort Aikens, James E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies link both depressive symptoms (DS) and diabetes-related distress (DRD) to diabetes self-management and/or glycemic control. However, longitudinal studies of these variables are rare, and their results are somewhat conflicting. The study objective was to compare DS and DRD as longitudinal predictors of medication adherence, self-care behavior, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Primary care patients with type 2 diabetes reported DS, DRD, and other variables at baseline were studied. Medication adherence, self-care behaviors (diet, physical activity, and glucose testing), and glycemic control (HbA(1c)) were assessed 6 months later (n = 253). Cross-sectional and longitudinal regression analyses were used to model behavioral and medical outcomes as a function of baseline confounders, DS, and DRD. RESULTS: Adjusted cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses yielded very similar results. In the latter, only DS were significantly associated with future diet behavior (P = 0.049), physical activity (P = 0.001), and glucose testing (P = 0.018). In contrast, only DRD predicted future glycemic control (P < 0.001) and medication adherence (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Distress-outcome associations seem to vary by type of distress under consideration. Only DS predicts future lifestyle-oriented self-management behaviors. In contrast, only DRD predicts glycemic control, perhaps by decreasing medication adherence. Clinical assessment and intervention should encompass both types of distress, unless the goal is to narrowly target a highly specific outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3507577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35075772013-12-01 Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Aikens, James E. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies link both depressive symptoms (DS) and diabetes-related distress (DRD) to diabetes self-management and/or glycemic control. However, longitudinal studies of these variables are rare, and their results are somewhat conflicting. The study objective was to compare DS and DRD as longitudinal predictors of medication adherence, self-care behavior, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Primary care patients with type 2 diabetes reported DS, DRD, and other variables at baseline were studied. Medication adherence, self-care behaviors (diet, physical activity, and glucose testing), and glycemic control (HbA(1c)) were assessed 6 months later (n = 253). Cross-sectional and longitudinal regression analyses were used to model behavioral and medical outcomes as a function of baseline confounders, DS, and DRD. RESULTS: Adjusted cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses yielded very similar results. In the latter, only DS were significantly associated with future diet behavior (P = 0.049), physical activity (P = 0.001), and glucose testing (P = 0.018). In contrast, only DRD predicted future glycemic control (P < 0.001) and medication adherence (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Distress-outcome associations seem to vary by type of distress under consideration. Only DS predicts future lifestyle-oriented self-management behaviors. In contrast, only DRD predicts glycemic control, perhaps by decreasing medication adherence. Clinical assessment and intervention should encompass both types of distress, unless the goal is to narrowly target a highly specific outcome. American Diabetes Association 2012-12 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3507577/ /pubmed/23033244 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0181 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aikens, James E.
Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title_full Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title_fullStr Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title_short Prospective Associations Between Emotional Distress and Poor Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
title_sort prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033244
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0181
work_keys_str_mv AT aikensjamese prospectiveassociationsbetweenemotionaldistressandpooroutcomesintype2diabetes