Cargando…

Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity

BACKGROUND: Although popular clinically, the psychometric properties of motivation rulers for tobacco cessation are unknown. This study examined the psychometric properties of rulers assessing importance, readiness, and confidence in tobacco cessation. METHODS: This observational study of current sm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boudreaux, Edwin D, Sullivan, Ashley, Abar, Beau, Bernstein, Steven L, Ginde, Adit A, Camargo, Carlos A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-7-8
_version_ 1782251097479446528
author Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sullivan, Ashley
Abar, Beau
Bernstein, Steven L
Ginde, Adit A
Camargo, Carlos A
author_facet Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sullivan, Ashley
Abar, Beau
Bernstein, Steven L
Ginde, Adit A
Camargo, Carlos A
author_sort Boudreaux, Edwin D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although popular clinically, the psychometric properties of motivation rulers for tobacco cessation are unknown. This study examined the psychometric properties of rulers assessing importance, readiness, and confidence in tobacco cessation. METHODS: This observational study of current smokers was conducted at 10 US emergency departments (EDs). Subjects were assessed during their ED visit (baseline) and reassessed two weeks later. We examined intercorrelations between the rulers as well as their construct and predictive validity. Hierarchical multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the rulers’ predictive ability after controlling for covariables. RESULTS: We enrolled 375 subjects. The correlations between the three rulers ranged from 0.50 (between Important and Confidence) to 0.70 (between Readiness and Confidence); all were significant (p < 0.001). Individuals in the preparation stage displayed the highest motivation-ruler ratings (all rulers F (2, 363) ≥ 43; p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariables, each of the rulers significantly improved prediction of smoking behavior change. The strength of their predictive ability was on par with that of stage of change. CONCLUSION: Our results provide preliminary support for the psychometric soundness of the importance, readiness, and confidence rulers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3507634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35076342012-11-28 Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity Boudreaux, Edwin D Sullivan, Ashley Abar, Beau Bernstein, Steven L Ginde, Adit A Camargo, Carlos A Addict Sci Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Although popular clinically, the psychometric properties of motivation rulers for tobacco cessation are unknown. This study examined the psychometric properties of rulers assessing importance, readiness, and confidence in tobacco cessation. METHODS: This observational study of current smokers was conducted at 10 US emergency departments (EDs). Subjects were assessed during their ED visit (baseline) and reassessed two weeks later. We examined intercorrelations between the rulers as well as their construct and predictive validity. Hierarchical multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the rulers’ predictive ability after controlling for covariables. RESULTS: We enrolled 375 subjects. The correlations between the three rulers ranged from 0.50 (between Important and Confidence) to 0.70 (between Readiness and Confidence); all were significant (p < 0.001). Individuals in the preparation stage displayed the highest motivation-ruler ratings (all rulers F (2, 363) ≥ 43; p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariables, each of the rulers significantly improved prediction of smoking behavior change. The strength of their predictive ability was on par with that of stage of change. CONCLUSION: Our results provide preliminary support for the psychometric soundness of the importance, readiness, and confidence rulers. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3507634/ /pubmed/23186265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-7-8 Text en Copyright ©2012 Boudreaux et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sullivan, Ashley
Abar, Beau
Bernstein, Steven L
Ginde, Adit A
Camargo, Carlos A
Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title_full Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title_fullStr Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title_full_unstemmed Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title_short Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
title_sort motivation rulers for smoking cessation: a prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-7-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boudreauxedwind motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity
AT sullivanashley motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity
AT abarbeau motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity
AT bernsteinstevenl motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity
AT gindeadita motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity
AT camargocarlosa motivationrulersforsmokingcessationaprospectiveobservationalexaminationofconstructandpredictivevalidity