Cargando…
Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction
BACKGROUND: Gene-environment interactions play an important role in the etiological pathway of complex diseases. An appropriate statistical method for handling a wide variety of complex situations involving interactions between variables is still lacking, especially when continuous variables are inv...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-37 |
_version_ | 1782251112665972736 |
---|---|
author | Günther, Frauke Pigeot, Iris Bammann, Karin |
author_facet | Günther, Frauke Pigeot, Iris Bammann, Karin |
author_sort | Günther, Frauke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene-environment interactions play an important role in the etiological pathway of complex diseases. An appropriate statistical method for handling a wide variety of complex situations involving interactions between variables is still lacking, especially when continuous variables are involved. The aim of this paper is to explore the ability of neural networks to model different structures of gene-environment interactions. A simulation study is set up to compare neural networks with standard logistic regression models. Eight different structures of gene-environment interactions are investigated. These structures are characterized by penetrance functions that are based on sigmoid functions or on combinations of linear and non-linear effects of a continuous environmental factor and a genetic factor with main effect or with a masking effect only. RESULTS: In our simulation study, neural networks are more successful in modeling gene-environment interactions than logistic regression models. This outperfomance is especially pronounced when modeling sigmoid penetrance functions, when distinguishing between linear and nonlinear components, and when modeling masking effects of the genetic factor. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that neural networks are a promising approach for analyzing gene-environment interactions. Especially, if no prior knowledge of the correct nature of the relationship between co-variables and response variable is present, neural networks provide a valuable alternative to regression methods that are limited to the analysis of linearly separable data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3507700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35077002012-12-03 Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction Günther, Frauke Pigeot, Iris Bammann, Karin BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Gene-environment interactions play an important role in the etiological pathway of complex diseases. An appropriate statistical method for handling a wide variety of complex situations involving interactions between variables is still lacking, especially when continuous variables are involved. The aim of this paper is to explore the ability of neural networks to model different structures of gene-environment interactions. A simulation study is set up to compare neural networks with standard logistic regression models. Eight different structures of gene-environment interactions are investigated. These structures are characterized by penetrance functions that are based on sigmoid functions or on combinations of linear and non-linear effects of a continuous environmental factor and a genetic factor with main effect or with a masking effect only. RESULTS: In our simulation study, neural networks are more successful in modeling gene-environment interactions than logistic regression models. This outperfomance is especially pronounced when modeling sigmoid penetrance functions, when distinguishing between linear and nonlinear components, and when modeling masking effects of the genetic factor. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that neural networks are a promising approach for analyzing gene-environment interactions. Especially, if no prior knowledge of the correct nature of the relationship between co-variables and response variable is present, neural networks provide a valuable alternative to regression methods that are limited to the analysis of linearly separable data. BioMed Central 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3507700/ /pubmed/22583704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-37 Text en Copyright ©2012 Günther et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Günther, Frauke Pigeot, Iris Bammann, Karin Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title | Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title_full | Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title_fullStr | Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title_short | Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
title_sort | artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guntherfrauke artificialneuralnetworksmodelinggeneenvironmentinteraction AT pigeotiris artificialneuralnetworksmodelinggeneenvironmentinteraction AT bammannkarin artificialneuralnetworksmodelinggeneenvironmentinteraction |