Cargando…
Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning
AIMS: To compare emergency and elective presentation of gastric cancer by mode of clinical presentation, initial stage, intervention and prognosis. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all cases of gastric cancer presenting to a tertiary referral centre between 2003 and 2010. This was stra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23009085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-31 |
_version_ | 1782251127054532608 |
---|---|
author | Vasas, Peter Wiggins, Tom Chaudry, Asif Bryant, Catherine Hughes, Frances S |
author_facet | Vasas, Peter Wiggins, Tom Chaudry, Asif Bryant, Catherine Hughes, Frances S |
author_sort | Vasas, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To compare emergency and elective presentation of gastric cancer by mode of clinical presentation, initial stage, intervention and prognosis. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all cases of gastric cancer presenting to a tertiary referral centre between 2003 and 2010. This was stratified by emergency and elective presentation and was analysed for mode of presentation, initial stage and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test and Chi(2) test. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients presented: Forty-two (14.43%) were emergencies and 249 (85.57%) elective presentations. Analysis of the emergency cohort showed 25 patients presented with obstruction (59.52%), 15 presented with haematemesis (35.71%) and 2 with perforation (4.76%). Eighteen of the emergency patients (45%) presented with stage 4 disease compared to 60 (25.42%) in the elective group (p < 0.005). Fourteen of the emergency patients were treated with curative intent (33.3%) compared with 130 (55.56%) in the elective group (p < 0.01). Over 6 years only 2 patients needed operation within 24 hours of presentation. Overall survival at one year for emergency patients was 48.3% compared to 63.4% in elective patients (p < 0.05). There were no survivors from the emergency group after 3 years but 32.46% of the elective patients survived (p < 0.02). Elective presentation with disease stage 1A-3B had a two year survival rate of 54.95% compared to only 20% in the emergency group (p < 0.05). Of patients who underwent operative intervention 67.44% of patients who presented electively survived to 2 years. This compared to just 25% presenting as emergencies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency presentation of gastric cancer is rare; is associated with higher stage of disease at presentation and lower rates of operability. The necessity to perform emergency operation within 24 hours is exceedingly rare. Emergency presentation is a marker of poor long term outcome for equivalent cancer stage in non-advanced (stages 1A-3B) disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3507761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35077612012-11-28 Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning Vasas, Peter Wiggins, Tom Chaudry, Asif Bryant, Catherine Hughes, Frances S World J Emerg Surg Research Article AIMS: To compare emergency and elective presentation of gastric cancer by mode of clinical presentation, initial stage, intervention and prognosis. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all cases of gastric cancer presenting to a tertiary referral centre between 2003 and 2010. This was stratified by emergency and elective presentation and was analysed for mode of presentation, initial stage and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test and Chi(2) test. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients presented: Forty-two (14.43%) were emergencies and 249 (85.57%) elective presentations. Analysis of the emergency cohort showed 25 patients presented with obstruction (59.52%), 15 presented with haematemesis (35.71%) and 2 with perforation (4.76%). Eighteen of the emergency patients (45%) presented with stage 4 disease compared to 60 (25.42%) in the elective group (p < 0.005). Fourteen of the emergency patients were treated with curative intent (33.3%) compared with 130 (55.56%) in the elective group (p < 0.01). Over 6 years only 2 patients needed operation within 24 hours of presentation. Overall survival at one year for emergency patients was 48.3% compared to 63.4% in elective patients (p < 0.05). There were no survivors from the emergency group after 3 years but 32.46% of the elective patients survived (p < 0.02). Elective presentation with disease stage 1A-3B had a two year survival rate of 54.95% compared to only 20% in the emergency group (p < 0.05). Of patients who underwent operative intervention 67.44% of patients who presented electively survived to 2 years. This compared to just 25% presenting as emergencies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency presentation of gastric cancer is rare; is associated with higher stage of disease at presentation and lower rates of operability. The necessity to perform emergency operation within 24 hours is exceedingly rare. Emergency presentation is a marker of poor long term outcome for equivalent cancer stage in non-advanced (stages 1A-3B) disease. BioMed Central 2012-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3507761/ /pubmed/23009085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vasas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vasas, Peter Wiggins, Tom Chaudry, Asif Bryant, Catherine Hughes, Frances S Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title | Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title_full | Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title_fullStr | Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title_short | Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
title_sort | emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23009085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-7-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasaspeter emergencypresentationofthegastriccancerprognosisandimplicationsforserviceplanning AT wigginstom emergencypresentationofthegastriccancerprognosisandimplicationsforserviceplanning AT chaudryasif emergencypresentationofthegastriccancerprognosisandimplicationsforserviceplanning AT bryantcatherine emergencypresentationofthegastriccancerprognosisandimplicationsforserviceplanning AT hughesfrancess emergencypresentationofthegastriccancerprognosisandimplicationsforserviceplanning |