Cargando…

Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Biopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Open biopsy is still considered the gold standard. However, recent literature suggests similar results for percutaneous biopsy techniques. Therefore, the aim of this retrospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohlig, Florian, Kirchhoff, Chlodwig, Lenze, Ulrich, Schauwecker, Johannes, Burgkart, Rainer, Rechl, Hans, von Eisenhart-Rothe, Ruediger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23114293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-17-29
_version_ 1782251145908977664
author Pohlig, Florian
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Lenze, Ulrich
Schauwecker, Johannes
Burgkart, Rainer
Rechl, Hans
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Ruediger
author_facet Pohlig, Florian
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Lenze, Ulrich
Schauwecker, Johannes
Burgkart, Rainer
Rechl, Hans
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Ruediger
author_sort Pohlig, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Open biopsy is still considered the gold standard. However, recent literature suggests similar results for percutaneous biopsy techniques. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare open and percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) regarding their accuracy in diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal lesions. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2009, all patients with suspected malignant primary bone or soft tissue tumour undergoing a percutaneous CNB or open biopsy and a subsequent tumour resection at our department were identified and enrolled. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both biopsy techniques and compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were identified and enrolled in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 100% for CNB in bone tumours. Sensitivity (95.5%), NPV (91.7%) and diagnostic accuracy (93.3%) for open biopsy in bone tumours showed slightly inferior results without statistical significance (p > 0.05). In soft tissue tumours favourable results were obtained in open biopsies compared to CNB with differences regarding sensitivity (100% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.5), NPV (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.09) and diagnostic accuracy (100% vs. 84.6%, p = 0,19) without statistical significance. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 92.9% for CNB and 98.0% for open biopsy (p = 0.55). A specific diagnosis could be obtained in 84.2% and 93.9%, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In our study we found moderately inferior results for the percutaneous biopsy technique compared to open biopsy in soft tissue tumours whereas almost equal results were obtained for both biopsy techniques for bone tumours. Thus, CNB is a safe, minimal invasive and cost-effective technique for diagnosing bony lesions. In soft tissue masses, the indication for percutaneous core needle biopsy needs to be made carefully by an experienced orthopaedic oncologist with respect to the suspected entity, size of necrosis and location of the lesion to avoid incorrect or deficient results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3507842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35078422012-11-28 Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study Pohlig, Florian Kirchhoff, Chlodwig Lenze, Ulrich Schauwecker, Johannes Burgkart, Rainer Rechl, Hans von Eisenhart-Rothe, Ruediger Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: Biopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Open biopsy is still considered the gold standard. However, recent literature suggests similar results for percutaneous biopsy techniques. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare open and percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) regarding their accuracy in diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal lesions. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2009, all patients with suspected malignant primary bone or soft tissue tumour undergoing a percutaneous CNB or open biopsy and a subsequent tumour resection at our department were identified and enrolled. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both biopsy techniques and compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were identified and enrolled in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 100% for CNB in bone tumours. Sensitivity (95.5%), NPV (91.7%) and diagnostic accuracy (93.3%) for open biopsy in bone tumours showed slightly inferior results without statistical significance (p > 0.05). In soft tissue tumours favourable results were obtained in open biopsies compared to CNB with differences regarding sensitivity (100% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.5), NPV (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.09) and diagnostic accuracy (100% vs. 84.6%, p = 0,19) without statistical significance. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 92.9% for CNB and 98.0% for open biopsy (p = 0.55). A specific diagnosis could be obtained in 84.2% and 93.9%, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In our study we found moderately inferior results for the percutaneous biopsy technique compared to open biopsy in soft tissue tumours whereas almost equal results were obtained for both biopsy techniques for bone tumours. Thus, CNB is a safe, minimal invasive and cost-effective technique for diagnosing bony lesions. In soft tissue masses, the indication for percutaneous core needle biopsy needs to be made carefully by an experienced orthopaedic oncologist with respect to the suspected entity, size of necrosis and location of the lesion to avoid incorrect or deficient results. BioMed Central 2012-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3507842/ /pubmed/23114293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-17-29 Text en Copyright ©2012 Pohlig et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pohlig, Florian
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Lenze, Ulrich
Schauwecker, Johannes
Burgkart, Rainer
Rechl, Hans
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Ruediger
Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title_full Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title_short Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
title_sort percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23114293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-17-29
work_keys_str_mv AT pohligflorian percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT kirchhoffchlodwig percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT lenzeulrich percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT schauweckerjohannes percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT burgkartrainer percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT rechlhans percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy
AT voneisenhartrotheruediger percutaneouscoreneedlebiopsyversusopenbiopsyindiagnosticsofboneandsofttissuesarcomaaretrospectivestudy