Cargando…

Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography

The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy/efficacy of digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination (DIFOTI) with film and digital radiography, in detection of approximal caries lesions. One hundred and twelve approximal surfaces were scored for caries, using DIFOTI images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ástvaldsdóttir, Á., Åhlund, K., Holbrook, W. P., de Verdier, B., Tranæus, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23213335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/326401
_version_ 1782251211450220544
author Ástvaldsdóttir, Á.
Åhlund, K.
Holbrook, W. P.
de Verdier, B.
Tranæus, S.
author_facet Ástvaldsdóttir, Á.
Åhlund, K.
Holbrook, W. P.
de Verdier, B.
Tranæus, S.
author_sort Ástvaldsdóttir, Á.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy/efficacy of digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination (DIFOTI) with film and digital radiography, in detection of approximal caries lesions. One hundred and twelve approximal surfaces were scored for caries, using DIFOTI images film and digital radiographs. All three sets of images were examined twice by 8 observers, with a minimal interval of one week between examinations. Validation of histological sections served as a reference standard. Reproducibility, based on intra- and interobserver agreement, was similar for all three methods. At diagnostic threshold D1 (enamel and dentin caries), DIFOTI showed significantly higher sensitivity, but differences in specificity between methods were nonsignificant. Diagnostic accuracy in the form of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was significantly higher for DIFOTI. At diagnostic threshold D3 (dentin caries), the differences in sensitivity and AUC among methods were nonsignificant, but DIFOTI showed significantly lower specificity. Compared with the radiographs, DIFOTI showed closer agreement, expressed as weighted kappa values, with the reference standard. The results show that under in vitro conditions, the diagnostic accuracy of DIFOTI in detecting early approximal enamel lesions is greater than that of film and digital radiography, while the potential for detecting lesions in dentin is similar for all three methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3508587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35085872012-12-04 Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography Ástvaldsdóttir, Á. Åhlund, K. Holbrook, W. P. de Verdier, B. Tranæus, S. Int J Dent Research Article The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy/efficacy of digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination (DIFOTI) with film and digital radiography, in detection of approximal caries lesions. One hundred and twelve approximal surfaces were scored for caries, using DIFOTI images film and digital radiographs. All three sets of images were examined twice by 8 observers, with a minimal interval of one week between examinations. Validation of histological sections served as a reference standard. Reproducibility, based on intra- and interobserver agreement, was similar for all three methods. At diagnostic threshold D1 (enamel and dentin caries), DIFOTI showed significantly higher sensitivity, but differences in specificity between methods were nonsignificant. Diagnostic accuracy in the form of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was significantly higher for DIFOTI. At diagnostic threshold D3 (dentin caries), the differences in sensitivity and AUC among methods were nonsignificant, but DIFOTI showed significantly lower specificity. Compared with the radiographs, DIFOTI showed closer agreement, expressed as weighted kappa values, with the reference standard. The results show that under in vitro conditions, the diagnostic accuracy of DIFOTI in detecting early approximal enamel lesions is greater than that of film and digital radiography, while the potential for detecting lesions in dentin is similar for all three methods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3508587/ /pubmed/23213335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/326401 Text en Copyright © 2012 Á. Ástvaldsdóttir et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ástvaldsdóttir, Á.
Åhlund, K.
Holbrook, W. P.
de Verdier, B.
Tranæus, S.
Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title_full Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title_fullStr Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title_full_unstemmed Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title_short Approximal Caries Detection by DIFOTI: In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy/Efficacy with Film and Digital Radiography
title_sort approximal caries detection by difoti: in vitro comparison of diagnostic accuracy/efficacy with film and digital radiography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23213335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/326401
work_keys_str_mv AT astvaldsdottira approximalcariesdetectionbydifotiinvitrocomparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyefficacywithfilmanddigitalradiography
AT ahlundk approximalcariesdetectionbydifotiinvitrocomparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyefficacywithfilmanddigitalradiography
AT holbrookwp approximalcariesdetectionbydifotiinvitrocomparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyefficacywithfilmanddigitalradiography
AT deverdierb approximalcariesdetectionbydifotiinvitrocomparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyefficacywithfilmanddigitalradiography
AT tranæuss approximalcariesdetectionbydifotiinvitrocomparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyefficacywithfilmanddigitalradiography