Cargando…

(Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy

“Biological optimization” (BIOP) means planning treatments using (radio)biological criteria and models, that is, tumour control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. Four different levels of BIOP are identified: Level I is “isotoxic” individualization of prescription dose D (presc)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nahum, Alan E., Uzan, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/329214
_version_ 1782251225112117248
author Nahum, Alan E.
Uzan, Julien
author_facet Nahum, Alan E.
Uzan, Julien
author_sort Nahum, Alan E.
collection PubMed
description “Biological optimization” (BIOP) means planning treatments using (radio)biological criteria and models, that is, tumour control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. Four different levels of BIOP are identified: Level I is “isotoxic” individualization of prescription dose D (presc) at fixed fraction number. D (presc) is varied to keep the NTCP of the organ at risk constant. Significant improvements in local control are expected for non-small-cell lung tumours. Level II involves the determination of an individualized isotoxic combination of D (presc) and fractionation scheme. This approach is appropriate for “parallel” OARs (lung, parotids). Examples are given using our BioSuite software. Hypofractionated SABR for early-stage NSCLC is effectively Level-II BIOP. Level-III BIOP uses radiobiological functions as part of the inverse planning of IMRT, for example, maximizing TCP whilst not exceeding a given NTCP. This results in non-uniform target doses. The NTCP model parameters (reflecting tissue “architecture”) drive the optimizer to emphasize different regions of the DVH, for example, penalising high doses for quasi-serial OARs such as rectum. Level-IV BIOP adds functional imaging information, for example, hypoxia or clonogen location, to Level III; examples are given of our prostate “dose painting” protocol, BioProp. The limitations of and uncertainties inherent in the radiobiological models are emphasized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3508750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35087502012-12-18 (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy Nahum, Alan E. Uzan, Julien Comput Math Methods Med Research Article “Biological optimization” (BIOP) means planning treatments using (radio)biological criteria and models, that is, tumour control probability and normal-tissue complication probability. Four different levels of BIOP are identified: Level I is “isotoxic” individualization of prescription dose D (presc) at fixed fraction number. D (presc) is varied to keep the NTCP of the organ at risk constant. Significant improvements in local control are expected for non-small-cell lung tumours. Level II involves the determination of an individualized isotoxic combination of D (presc) and fractionation scheme. This approach is appropriate for “parallel” OARs (lung, parotids). Examples are given using our BioSuite software. Hypofractionated SABR for early-stage NSCLC is effectively Level-II BIOP. Level-III BIOP uses radiobiological functions as part of the inverse planning of IMRT, for example, maximizing TCP whilst not exceeding a given NTCP. This results in non-uniform target doses. The NTCP model parameters (reflecting tissue “architecture”) drive the optimizer to emphasize different regions of the DVH, for example, penalising high doses for quasi-serial OARs such as rectum. Level-IV BIOP adds functional imaging information, for example, hypoxia or clonogen location, to Level III; examples are given of our prostate “dose painting” protocol, BioProp. The limitations of and uncertainties inherent in the radiobiological models are emphasized. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3508750/ /pubmed/23251227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/329214 Text en Copyright © 2012 A. E. Nahum and J. Uzan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nahum, Alan E.
Uzan, Julien
(Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title_full (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title_fullStr (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title_short (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy
title_sort (radio)biological optimization of external-beam radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/329214
work_keys_str_mv AT nahumalane radiobiologicaloptimizationofexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT uzanjulien radiobiologicaloptimizationofexternalbeamradiotherapy