Cargando…

Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear

BACKGROUND: Human disturbance can influence wildlife behaviour, which can have implications for wildlife populations. For example, wildlife may be more vigilant near human disturbance, resulting in decreased forage intake and reduced reproductive success. We measured the effects of human activities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciuti, Simone, Northrup, Joseph M., Muhly, Tyler B., Simi, Silvia, Musiani, Marco, Pitt, Justin A., Boyce, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050611
_version_ 1782251289186402304
author Ciuti, Simone
Northrup, Joseph M.
Muhly, Tyler B.
Simi, Silvia
Musiani, Marco
Pitt, Justin A.
Boyce, Mark S.
author_facet Ciuti, Simone
Northrup, Joseph M.
Muhly, Tyler B.
Simi, Silvia
Musiani, Marco
Pitt, Justin A.
Boyce, Mark S.
author_sort Ciuti, Simone
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human disturbance can influence wildlife behaviour, which can have implications for wildlife populations. For example, wildlife may be more vigilant near human disturbance, resulting in decreased forage intake and reduced reproductive success. We measured the effects of human activities compared to predator and other environmental factors on the behaviour of elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus 1758) in a human-dominated landscape in Alberta, Canada. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We collected year-round behavioural data of elk across a range of human disturbances. We estimated linear mixed models of elk behaviour and found that human factors (land-use type, traffic and distance from roads) and elk herd size accounted for more than 80% of variability in elk vigilance. Elk decreased their feeding time when closer to roads, and road traffic volumes of at least 1 vehicle every 2 hours induced elk to switch into a more vigilant behavioural mode with a subsequent loss in feeding time. Other environmental factors, thought crucial in shaping vigilance behaviour in elk (natural predators, reproductive status of females), were not important. The highest levels of vigilance were recorded on public lands where hunting and motorized recreational activities were cumulative compared to the national park during summer, which had the lowest levels of vigilance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In a human-dominated landscape, effects of human disturbance on elk behaviour exceed those of habitat and natural predators. Humans trigger increased vigilance and decreased foraging in elk. However, it is not just the number of people but also the type of human activity that influences elk behaviour (e.g. hiking vs. hunting). Quantifying the actual fitness costs of human disturbance remains a challenge in field studies but should be a primary focus for future researches. Some species are much more likely to be disturbed by humans than by non-human predators: for these species, quantifying human disturbance may be the highest priority for conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3509092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35090922012-12-05 Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear Ciuti, Simone Northrup, Joseph M. Muhly, Tyler B. Simi, Silvia Musiani, Marco Pitt, Justin A. Boyce, Mark S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Human disturbance can influence wildlife behaviour, which can have implications for wildlife populations. For example, wildlife may be more vigilant near human disturbance, resulting in decreased forage intake and reduced reproductive success. We measured the effects of human activities compared to predator and other environmental factors on the behaviour of elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus 1758) in a human-dominated landscape in Alberta, Canada. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We collected year-round behavioural data of elk across a range of human disturbances. We estimated linear mixed models of elk behaviour and found that human factors (land-use type, traffic and distance from roads) and elk herd size accounted for more than 80% of variability in elk vigilance. Elk decreased their feeding time when closer to roads, and road traffic volumes of at least 1 vehicle every 2 hours induced elk to switch into a more vigilant behavioural mode with a subsequent loss in feeding time. Other environmental factors, thought crucial in shaping vigilance behaviour in elk (natural predators, reproductive status of females), were not important. The highest levels of vigilance were recorded on public lands where hunting and motorized recreational activities were cumulative compared to the national park during summer, which had the lowest levels of vigilance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In a human-dominated landscape, effects of human disturbance on elk behaviour exceed those of habitat and natural predators. Humans trigger increased vigilance and decreased foraging in elk. However, it is not just the number of people but also the type of human activity that influences elk behaviour (e.g. hiking vs. hunting). Quantifying the actual fitness costs of human disturbance remains a challenge in field studies but should be a primary focus for future researches. Some species are much more likely to be disturbed by humans than by non-human predators: for these species, quantifying human disturbance may be the highest priority for conservation. Public Library of Science 2012-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3509092/ /pubmed/23226330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050611 Text en © 2012 Ciuti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ciuti, Simone
Northrup, Joseph M.
Muhly, Tyler B.
Simi, Silvia
Musiani, Marco
Pitt, Justin A.
Boyce, Mark S.
Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title_full Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title_fullStr Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title_short Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear
title_sort effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050611
work_keys_str_mv AT ciutisimone effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT northrupjosephm effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT muhlytylerb effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT simisilvia effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT musianimarco effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT pittjustina effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear
AT boycemarks effectsofhumansonbehaviourofwildlifeexceedthoseofnaturalpredatorsinalandscapeoffear