Cargando…

Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration

Here, we describe a novel method for volumetric segmentation of the amygdala from MRI images collected from 35 human subjects. This approach is adapted from open-source techniques employed previously with the hippocampus (Suh et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011a,b). Using multi-atlas segmentation and ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanson, Jamie L., Suh, Jung W., Nacewicz, Brendon M., Sutterer, Matthew J., Cayo, Amelia A., Stodola, Diane E., Burghy, Cory A., Wang, Hongzhi, Avants, Brian B., Yushkevich, Paul A., Essex, Marilyn J., Pollak, Seth D., Davidson, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00166
_version_ 1782251317684600832
author Hanson, Jamie L.
Suh, Jung W.
Nacewicz, Brendon M.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Cayo, Amelia A.
Stodola, Diane E.
Burghy, Cory A.
Wang, Hongzhi
Avants, Brian B.
Yushkevich, Paul A.
Essex, Marilyn J.
Pollak, Seth D.
Davidson, Richard J.
author_facet Hanson, Jamie L.
Suh, Jung W.
Nacewicz, Brendon M.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Cayo, Amelia A.
Stodola, Diane E.
Burghy, Cory A.
Wang, Hongzhi
Avants, Brian B.
Yushkevich, Paul A.
Essex, Marilyn J.
Pollak, Seth D.
Davidson, Richard J.
author_sort Hanson, Jamie L.
collection PubMed
description Here, we describe a novel method for volumetric segmentation of the amygdala from MRI images collected from 35 human subjects. This approach is adapted from open-source techniques employed previously with the hippocampus (Suh et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011a,b). Using multi-atlas segmentation and machine learning-based correction, we were able to produce automated amygdala segments with high Dice (Mean = 0.918 for the left amygdala; 0.916 for the right amygdala) and Jaccard coefficients (Mean = 0.850 for the left; 0.846 for the right) compared to rigorously hand-traced volumes. This automated routine also produced amygdala segments with high intra-class correlations (consistency = 0.830, absolute agreement = 0.819 for the left; consistency = 0.786, absolute agreement = 0.783 for the right) and bivariate (r = 0.831 for the left; r = 0.797 for the right) compared to hand-drawn amygdala. Our results are discussed in relation to other cutting-edge segmentation techniques, as well as commonly available approaches to amygdala segmentation (e.g., Freesurfer). We believe this new technique has broad application to research with large sample sizes for which amygdala quantification might be needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3509347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35093472012-12-05 Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration Hanson, Jamie L. Suh, Jung W. Nacewicz, Brendon M. Sutterer, Matthew J. Cayo, Amelia A. Stodola, Diane E. Burghy, Cory A. Wang, Hongzhi Avants, Brian B. Yushkevich, Paul A. Essex, Marilyn J. Pollak, Seth D. Davidson, Richard J. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Here, we describe a novel method for volumetric segmentation of the amygdala from MRI images collected from 35 human subjects. This approach is adapted from open-source techniques employed previously with the hippocampus (Suh et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011a,b). Using multi-atlas segmentation and machine learning-based correction, we were able to produce automated amygdala segments with high Dice (Mean = 0.918 for the left amygdala; 0.916 for the right amygdala) and Jaccard coefficients (Mean = 0.850 for the left; 0.846 for the right) compared to rigorously hand-traced volumes. This automated routine also produced amygdala segments with high intra-class correlations (consistency = 0.830, absolute agreement = 0.819 for the left; consistency = 0.786, absolute agreement = 0.783 for the right) and bivariate (r = 0.831 for the left; r = 0.797 for the right) compared to hand-drawn amygdala. Our results are discussed in relation to other cutting-edge segmentation techniques, as well as commonly available approaches to amygdala segmentation (e.g., Freesurfer). We believe this new technique has broad application to research with large sample sizes for which amygdala quantification might be needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3509347/ /pubmed/23226114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00166 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hanson, Suh, Nacewicz, Sutterer, Cayo, Stodola, Burghy, Wang, Avants, Yushkevich, Essex, Pollak and Davidson. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hanson, Jamie L.
Suh, Jung W.
Nacewicz, Brendon M.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Cayo, Amelia A.
Stodola, Diane E.
Burghy, Cory A.
Wang, Hongzhi
Avants, Brian B.
Yushkevich, Paul A.
Essex, Marilyn J.
Pollak, Seth D.
Davidson, Richard J.
Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title_full Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title_fullStr Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title_full_unstemmed Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title_short Robust Automated Amygdala Segmentation via Multi-Atlas Diffeomorphic Registration
title_sort robust automated amygdala segmentation via multi-atlas diffeomorphic registration
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00166
work_keys_str_mv AT hansonjamiel robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT suhjungw robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT nacewiczbrendonm robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT sutterermatthewj robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT cayoameliaa robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT stodoladianee robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT burghycorya robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT wanghongzhi robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT avantsbrianb robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT yushkevichpaula robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT essexmarilynj robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT pollaksethd robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration
AT davidsonrichardj robustautomatedamygdalasegmentationviamultiatlasdiffeomorphicregistration