Cargando…

Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts

Computational chemistry is an important tool for signal assignment of (27)Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in order to elucidate the species of aluminum(III) in aqueous solutions. The accuracy of the popular theoretical models for computing the (27)Al chemical shifts was evaluated by comparing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xianlong, Wang, Chengfei, Zhao, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23203134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms131115420
_version_ 1782251376124887040
author Wang, Xianlong
Wang, Chengfei
Zhao, Hui
author_facet Wang, Xianlong
Wang, Chengfei
Zhao, Hui
author_sort Wang, Xianlong
collection PubMed
description Computational chemistry is an important tool for signal assignment of (27)Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in order to elucidate the species of aluminum(III) in aqueous solutions. The accuracy of the popular theoretical models for computing the (27)Al chemical shifts was evaluated by comparing the calculated and experimental chemical shifts in more than one hundred aluminum(III) complexes. In order to differentiate the error due to the chemical shielding tensor calculation from that due to the inadequacy of the molecular geometry prediction, single-crystal X-ray diffraction determined structures were used to build the isolated molecule models for calculating the chemical shifts. The results were compared with those obtained using the calculated geometries at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. The isotropic chemical shielding constants computed at different levels have strong linear correlations even though the absolute values differ in tens of ppm. The root-mean-square difference between the experimental chemical shifts and the calculated values is approximately 5 ppm for the calculations based on the X-ray structures, but more than 10 ppm for the calculations based on the computed geometries. The result indicates that the popular theoretical models are adequate in calculating the chemical shifts while an accurate molecular geometry is more critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3509650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35096502013-01-09 Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts Wang, Xianlong Wang, Chengfei Zhao, Hui Int J Mol Sci Article Computational chemistry is an important tool for signal assignment of (27)Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in order to elucidate the species of aluminum(III) in aqueous solutions. The accuracy of the popular theoretical models for computing the (27)Al chemical shifts was evaluated by comparing the calculated and experimental chemical shifts in more than one hundred aluminum(III) complexes. In order to differentiate the error due to the chemical shielding tensor calculation from that due to the inadequacy of the molecular geometry prediction, single-crystal X-ray diffraction determined structures were used to build the isolated molecule models for calculating the chemical shifts. The results were compared with those obtained using the calculated geometries at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. The isotropic chemical shielding constants computed at different levels have strong linear correlations even though the absolute values differ in tens of ppm. The root-mean-square difference between the experimental chemical shifts and the calculated values is approximately 5 ppm for the calculations based on the X-ray structures, but more than 10 ppm for the calculations based on the computed geometries. The result indicates that the popular theoretical models are adequate in calculating the chemical shifts while an accurate molecular geometry is more critical. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3509650/ /pubmed/23203134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms131115420 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Xianlong
Wang, Chengfei
Zhao, Hui
Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title_full Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title_fullStr Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title_full_unstemmed Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title_short Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts
title_sort errors in the calculation of 27al nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3509650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23203134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms131115420
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxianlong errorsinthecalculationof27alnuclearmagneticresonancechemicalshifts
AT wangchengfei errorsinthecalculationof27alnuclearmagneticresonancechemicalshifts
AT zhaohui errorsinthecalculationof27alnuclearmagneticresonancechemicalshifts