Cargando…

Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy

After allotransplantation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) may be transmitted from the donor organ, giving rise to primary infection in a CMV negative recipient or reinfection in one who is CMV positive. In addition, latent CMV may reactivate in a CMV positive recipient. In this study, serial blood samples fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atabani, S F, Smith, C, Atkinson, C, Aldridge, R W, Rodriguez-Perálvarez, M, Rolando, N, Harber, M, Jones, G, O’Riordan, A, Burroughs, A K, Thorburn, D, O’Beirne, J, Milne, R S B, Emery, V C, Griffiths, P D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04087.x
_version_ 1782251454116921344
author Atabani, S F
Smith, C
Atkinson, C
Aldridge, R W
Rodriguez-Perálvarez, M
Rolando, N
Harber, M
Jones, G
O’Riordan, A
Burroughs, A K
Thorburn, D
O’Beirne, J
Milne, R S B
Emery, V C
Griffiths, P D
author_facet Atabani, S F
Smith, C
Atkinson, C
Aldridge, R W
Rodriguez-Perálvarez, M
Rolando, N
Harber, M
Jones, G
O’Riordan, A
Burroughs, A K
Thorburn, D
O’Beirne, J
Milne, R S B
Emery, V C
Griffiths, P D
author_sort Atabani, S F
collection PubMed
description After allotransplantation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) may be transmitted from the donor organ, giving rise to primary infection in a CMV negative recipient or reinfection in one who is CMV positive. In addition, latent CMV may reactivate in a CMV positive recipient. In this study, serial blood samples from 689 kidney or liver transplant recipients were tested for CMV DNA by quantitative PCR. CMV was managed using preemptive antiviral therapy and no patient received antiviral prophylaxis. Dynamic and quantitative measures of viremia and treatment were assessed. Median peak viral load, duration of viremia and duration of treatment were highest during primary infection, followed by reinfection then reactivation. In patients who experienced a second episode of viremia, the viral replication rate was significantly slower than in the first episode. Our data provide a clear demonstration of the immune control of CMV in immunosuppressed patients and emphasize the effectiveness of the preemptive approach for prevention of CMV syndrome and end organ disease. Overall, our findings provide quantitative biomarkers which can be used in pharmacodynamic assessments of the ability of novel CMV vaccines or antiviral drugs to reduce or even interrupt such transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3510308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35103082012-12-06 Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy Atabani, S F Smith, C Atkinson, C Aldridge, R W Rodriguez-Perálvarez, M Rolando, N Harber, M Jones, G O’Riordan, A Burroughs, A K Thorburn, D O’Beirne, J Milne, R S B Emery, V C Griffiths, P D Am J Transplant Original Articles After allotransplantation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) may be transmitted from the donor organ, giving rise to primary infection in a CMV negative recipient or reinfection in one who is CMV positive. In addition, latent CMV may reactivate in a CMV positive recipient. In this study, serial blood samples from 689 kidney or liver transplant recipients were tested for CMV DNA by quantitative PCR. CMV was managed using preemptive antiviral therapy and no patient received antiviral prophylaxis. Dynamic and quantitative measures of viremia and treatment were assessed. Median peak viral load, duration of viremia and duration of treatment were highest during primary infection, followed by reinfection then reactivation. In patients who experienced a second episode of viremia, the viral replication rate was significantly slower than in the first episode. Our data provide a clear demonstration of the immune control of CMV in immunosuppressed patients and emphasize the effectiveness of the preemptive approach for prevention of CMV syndrome and end organ disease. Overall, our findings provide quantitative biomarkers which can be used in pharmacodynamic assessments of the ability of novel CMV vaccines or antiviral drugs to reduce or even interrupt such transmission. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3510308/ /pubmed/22594993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04087.x Text en © Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Atabani, S F
Smith, C
Atkinson, C
Aldridge, R W
Rodriguez-Perálvarez, M
Rolando, N
Harber, M
Jones, G
O’Riordan, A
Burroughs, A K
Thorburn, D
O’Beirne, J
Milne, R S B
Emery, V C
Griffiths, P D
Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title_full Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title_fullStr Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title_short Cytomegalovirus Replication Kinetics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy
title_sort cytomegalovirus replication kinetics in solid organ transplant recipients managed by preemptive therapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04087.x
work_keys_str_mv AT atabanisf cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT smithc cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT atkinsonc cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT aldridgerw cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT rodriguezperalvarezm cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT rolandon cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT harberm cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT jonesg cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT oriordana cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT burroughsak cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT thorburnd cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT obeirnej cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT milnersb cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT emeryvc cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy
AT griffithspd cytomegalovirusreplicationkineticsinsolidorgantransplantrecipientsmanagedbypreemptivetherapy