Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: University students in Sweden routinely receive proactive mail-based alcohol Internet interventions sent from student health services. This intervention provides personalized normative feedback on alcohol consumption with suggestions on how to decrease drinking. Earlier feasibility trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bendtsen, Preben, McCambridge, Jim, Bendtsen, Marcus, Karlsson, Nadine, Nilsen, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113955
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2062
_version_ 1782251495245217792
author Bendtsen, Preben
McCambridge, Jim
Bendtsen, Marcus
Karlsson, Nadine
Nilsen, Per
author_facet Bendtsen, Preben
McCambridge, Jim
Bendtsen, Marcus
Karlsson, Nadine
Nilsen, Per
author_sort Bendtsen, Preben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: University students in Sweden routinely receive proactive mail-based alcohol Internet interventions sent from student health services. This intervention provides personalized normative feedback on alcohol consumption with suggestions on how to decrease drinking. Earlier feasibility trials by our group and others have examined effectiveness in simple parallel-groups designs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of electronic screening and brief intervention, using a randomized controlled trial design that takes account of baseline assessment reactivity (and other possible effects of the research process) due to the similarity between the intervention and assessment content. The design of the study allowed for exploration of the magnitude of the assessment effects per se. METHODS: This trial used a dismantling design and randomly assigned 5227 students to 3 groups: (1) routine practice assessment and feedback, (2) assessment-only without feedback, and (3) neither assessment nor feedback. At baseline all participants were blinded to study participation, with no contact being made with group 3. We approached students 2 months later to participate in a cross-sectional alcohol survey. All interventions were fully automated and did not have any human involvement. All data used in the analysis were based on self-assessment using questionnaires. The participants were unaware that they were participating in a trial and thus were also blinded to which group they were randomly assigned. RESULTS: Overall, 44.69% (n = 2336) of those targeted for study completed follow-up. Attrition was similar in groups 1 (697/1742, 40.01%) and 2 (737/1742, 42.31% retained) and lower in group 3 (902/1743, 51.75% retained). Intention-to-treat analyses among all participants regardless of their baseline drinking status revealed no differences between groups in all alcohol parameters at the 2-month follow-up. Per-protocol analyses of groups 1 and 2 among those who accepted the email intervention (36.2% of the students who were offered the intervention in group 1 and 37.3% of the students in group2 ) and who were risky drinkers at baseline (60.7% follow-up rate in group 1 and 63.5% in group 2) suggested possible small beneficial effects on weekly consumption attributable to feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This approach to outcome evaluation is highly conservative, and small benefits may follow the actual uptake of feedback intervention in students who are risky drinkers, the precise target group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 24735383; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN24735383 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Awq7gjXG)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3510746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35107462012-12-28 Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial Bendtsen, Preben McCambridge, Jim Bendtsen, Marcus Karlsson, Nadine Nilsen, Per J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: University students in Sweden routinely receive proactive mail-based alcohol Internet interventions sent from student health services. This intervention provides personalized normative feedback on alcohol consumption with suggestions on how to decrease drinking. Earlier feasibility trials by our group and others have examined effectiveness in simple parallel-groups designs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of electronic screening and brief intervention, using a randomized controlled trial design that takes account of baseline assessment reactivity (and other possible effects of the research process) due to the similarity between the intervention and assessment content. The design of the study allowed for exploration of the magnitude of the assessment effects per se. METHODS: This trial used a dismantling design and randomly assigned 5227 students to 3 groups: (1) routine practice assessment and feedback, (2) assessment-only without feedback, and (3) neither assessment nor feedback. At baseline all participants were blinded to study participation, with no contact being made with group 3. We approached students 2 months later to participate in a cross-sectional alcohol survey. All interventions were fully automated and did not have any human involvement. All data used in the analysis were based on self-assessment using questionnaires. The participants were unaware that they were participating in a trial and thus were also blinded to which group they were randomly assigned. RESULTS: Overall, 44.69% (n = 2336) of those targeted for study completed follow-up. Attrition was similar in groups 1 (697/1742, 40.01%) and 2 (737/1742, 42.31% retained) and lower in group 3 (902/1743, 51.75% retained). Intention-to-treat analyses among all participants regardless of their baseline drinking status revealed no differences between groups in all alcohol parameters at the 2-month follow-up. Per-protocol analyses of groups 1 and 2 among those who accepted the email intervention (36.2% of the students who were offered the intervention in group 1 and 37.3% of the students in group2 ) and who were risky drinkers at baseline (60.7% follow-up rate in group 1 and 63.5% in group 2) suggested possible small beneficial effects on weekly consumption attributable to feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This approach to outcome evaluation is highly conservative, and small benefits may follow the actual uptake of feedback intervention in students who are risky drinkers, the precise target group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 24735383; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN24735383 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Awq7gjXG) Gunther Eysenbach 2012-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3510746/ /pubmed/23113955 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2062 Text en ©Preben Bendtsen, Jim McCambridge, Marcus Bendtsen, Nadine Karlsson, Per Nilsen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 31.10.2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bendtsen, Preben
McCambridge, Jim
Bendtsen, Marcus
Karlsson, Nadine
Nilsen, Per
Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of a proactive mail-based alcohol internet intervention for university students: dismantling the assessment and feedback components in a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113955
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2062
work_keys_str_mv AT bendtsenpreben effectivenessofaproactivemailbasedalcoholinternetinterventionforuniversitystudentsdismantlingtheassessmentandfeedbackcomponentsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mccambridgejim effectivenessofaproactivemailbasedalcoholinternetinterventionforuniversitystudentsdismantlingtheassessmentandfeedbackcomponentsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bendtsenmarcus effectivenessofaproactivemailbasedalcoholinternetinterventionforuniversitystudentsdismantlingtheassessmentandfeedbackcomponentsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karlssonnadine effectivenessofaproactivemailbasedalcoholinternetinterventionforuniversitystudentsdismantlingtheassessmentandfeedbackcomponentsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nilsenper effectivenessofaproactivemailbasedalcoholinternetinterventionforuniversitystudentsdismantlingtheassessmentandfeedbackcomponentsinarandomizedcontrolledtrial