Cargando…

Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND: The growth in the number of patients seeking health information online has given rise to new direct-to-patient research methods, including direct patient recruitment and study conduct without use of physician sites. While such patient-centric designs offer time and cost efficiencies, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cascade, Elisa, Marr, Paige, Winslow, Matthew, Burgess, Andrew, Nixon, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060427
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2202
_version_ 1782251495728611328
author Cascade, Elisa
Marr, Paige
Winslow, Matthew
Burgess, Andrew
Nixon, Mark
author_facet Cascade, Elisa
Marr, Paige
Winslow, Matthew
Burgess, Andrew
Nixon, Mark
author_sort Cascade, Elisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The growth in the number of patients seeking health information online has given rise to new direct-to-patient research methods, including direct patient recruitment and study conduct without use of physician sites. While such patient-centric designs offer time and cost efficiencies, the absence of physician-reported data is a key concern, with potential impact on both scientific rigor and operational feasibility. OBJECTIVE: To (1) gain insight into the viability of collecting patient-reported outcomes and medical record information in a sample of gout patients through a direct-to-patient approach (ie, without the involvement of physician sites), and (2) evaluate the validity of patient-reported diagnoses collected during a patient-reported outcomes plus medical record (PRO+MR) direct-to-patient study. METHODS: We invited a random sample of MediGuard.org members aged 18 to 80 years to participate via email based on a gout treatment or diagnosis in their online profiles. Interested members clicked on an email link to access study information, consent to participate electronically, and be screened for eligibility. The first 50 consenting participants completed an online survey and provided electronic and wet signatures on medical record release forms for us to obtain medical charts from their managing physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 1250 MediGuard.org members (8.64%) accessed study information before we closed the study at 50 completed surveys. Of these 108 members who took the screener, 50 (46.3%) completed the study, 19 (17.6%) did not pass the screening, 5 (4.6%) explicitly declined to participate due to the medical record requirement, and 34 (31.5%) closed the browser without completing the survey screener. Ultimately, we obtained 38 of 50 charts (76%): 28 collected using electronic signature and 10 collected based on wet signature on a paper form. Of the 38 charts, 37 cited a gout diagnosis (35 charts) or use of a gout medication (2 charts). Only 1 chart lacked any mention of gout. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be recruited directly for observational study designs that include patient-reported outcomes and medical record data with over 75% data completeness. Although the validity of self-reported diagnosis is often a concern in Internet-based studies, in this PRO+MR study pilot, nearly all (37 of 38) charts confirmed patient-reported data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3510750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35107502012-12-28 Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes Cascade, Elisa Marr, Paige Winslow, Matthew Burgess, Andrew Nixon, Mark J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The growth in the number of patients seeking health information online has given rise to new direct-to-patient research methods, including direct patient recruitment and study conduct without use of physician sites. While such patient-centric designs offer time and cost efficiencies, the absence of physician-reported data is a key concern, with potential impact on both scientific rigor and operational feasibility. OBJECTIVE: To (1) gain insight into the viability of collecting patient-reported outcomes and medical record information in a sample of gout patients through a direct-to-patient approach (ie, without the involvement of physician sites), and (2) evaluate the validity of patient-reported diagnoses collected during a patient-reported outcomes plus medical record (PRO+MR) direct-to-patient study. METHODS: We invited a random sample of MediGuard.org members aged 18 to 80 years to participate via email based on a gout treatment or diagnosis in their online profiles. Interested members clicked on an email link to access study information, consent to participate electronically, and be screened for eligibility. The first 50 consenting participants completed an online survey and provided electronic and wet signatures on medical record release forms for us to obtain medical charts from their managing physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 1250 MediGuard.org members (8.64%) accessed study information before we closed the study at 50 completed surveys. Of these 108 members who took the screener, 50 (46.3%) completed the study, 19 (17.6%) did not pass the screening, 5 (4.6%) explicitly declined to participate due to the medical record requirement, and 34 (31.5%) closed the browser without completing the survey screener. Ultimately, we obtained 38 of 50 charts (76%): 28 collected using electronic signature and 10 collected based on wet signature on a paper form. Of the 38 charts, 37 cited a gout diagnosis (35 charts) or use of a gout medication (2 charts). Only 1 chart lacked any mention of gout. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be recruited directly for observational study designs that include patient-reported outcomes and medical record data with over 75% data completeness. Although the validity of self-reported diagnosis is often a concern in Internet-based studies, in this PRO+MR study pilot, nearly all (37 of 38) charts confirmed patient-reported data. Gunther Eysenbach 2012-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3510750/ /pubmed/23060427 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2202 Text en ©Elisa Cascade, Paige Marr, Matthew Winslow, Andrew Burgess, Mark Nixon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 11.10.2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cascade, Elisa
Marr, Paige
Winslow, Matthew
Burgess, Andrew
Nixon, Mark
Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_fullStr Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_short Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_sort conducting research on the internet: medical record data integration with patient-reported outcomes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060427
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2202
work_keys_str_mv AT cascadeelisa conductingresearchontheinternetmedicalrecorddataintegrationwithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT marrpaige conductingresearchontheinternetmedicalrecorddataintegrationwithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT winslowmatthew conductingresearchontheinternetmedicalrecorddataintegrationwithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT burgessandrew conductingresearchontheinternetmedicalrecorddataintegrationwithpatientreportedoutcomes
AT nixonmark conductingresearchontheinternetmedicalrecorddataintegrationwithpatientreportedoutcomes