Cargando…

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health are designed as noninferiority studies, aiming to show that the telemedicine/e-health solution is not inferior to the traditional way of treating patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to review and sum up the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kummervold, Per Egil, Johnsen, Jan-Are K, Skrøvseth, Stein Olav, Wynn, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23022989
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2169
_version_ 1782251497828909056
author Kummervold, Per Egil
Johnsen, Jan-Are K
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Wynn, Rolf
author_facet Kummervold, Per Egil
Johnsen, Jan-Are K
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Wynn, Rolf
author_sort Kummervold, Per Egil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health are designed as noninferiority studies, aiming to show that the telemedicine/e-health solution is not inferior to the traditional way of treating patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to review and sum up the status of noninferiority studies within this field, describing advantages and pitfalls of this approach. METHODS: PubMed was searched according to defined criteria, and 16 relevant articles were identified from the period 2008-June 2011. RESULTS: Most of the studies were related to the fields of psychiatry and emergency medicine, and most were published in journals relating to these fields or in general scientific or general medicine journals. All the studies claimed to be noninferiority studies, but 7 out of 16 tested for statistical differences as a proxy of noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of the studies varied. We discuss optimal procedures for future noninferiority studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health and situations in which this approach is most appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3510769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35107692012-12-28 Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review Kummervold, Per Egil Johnsen, Jan-Are K Skrøvseth, Stein Olav Wynn, Rolf J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health are designed as noninferiority studies, aiming to show that the telemedicine/e-health solution is not inferior to the traditional way of treating patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to review and sum up the status of noninferiority studies within this field, describing advantages and pitfalls of this approach. METHODS: PubMed was searched according to defined criteria, and 16 relevant articles were identified from the period 2008-June 2011. RESULTS: Most of the studies were related to the fields of psychiatry and emergency medicine, and most were published in journals relating to these fields or in general scientific or general medicine journals. All the studies claimed to be noninferiority studies, but 7 out of 16 tested for statistical differences as a proxy of noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of the studies varied. We discuss optimal procedures for future noninferiority studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health and situations in which this approach is most appropriate. Gunther Eysenbach 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3510769/ /pubmed/23022989 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2169 Text en ©Per Egil Kummervold, Jan-Are K Johnsen, Stein Olav Skrøvseth, Rolf Wynn. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.09.2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Kummervold, Per Egil
Johnsen, Jan-Are K
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Wynn, Rolf
Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title_full Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title_short Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
title_sort using noninferiority tests to evaluate telemedicine and e-health services: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23022989
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2169
work_keys_str_mv AT kummervoldperegil usingnoninferiorityteststoevaluatetelemedicineandehealthservicessystematicreview
AT johnsenjanarek usingnoninferiorityteststoevaluatetelemedicineandehealthservicessystematicreview
AT skrøvsethsteinolav usingnoninferiorityteststoevaluatetelemedicineandehealthservicessystematicreview
AT wynnrolf usingnoninferiorityteststoevaluatetelemedicineandehealthservicessystematicreview