Cargando…

The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) 130/0.4 (Voluven®) and 130/0.42 (Venofundin®) impair coagulation less than older HES solutions with higher molecular weight and molar substitution. Thus, these may be used in high doses up to 50 ml/kg/day. The aim of this study was to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staikou, Chryssoula, Paraskeva, Anteia, Fassoulaki, Argyro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23041738
_version_ 1782251508039942144
author Staikou, Chryssoula
Paraskeva, Anteia
Fassoulaki, Argyro
author_facet Staikou, Chryssoula
Paraskeva, Anteia
Fassoulaki, Argyro
author_sort Staikou, Chryssoula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) 130/0.4 (Voluven®) and 130/0.42 (Venofundin®) impair coagulation less than older HES solutions with higher molecular weight and molar substitution. Thus, these may be used in high doses up to 50 ml/kg/day. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of HES 130/0.4 versus HES 130/0.42 on coagulation after the intraoperative infusion of 30 ml/kg in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Fifty two patients scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery were randomized to receive 30 ml/kg of HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42 intraoperatively. Coagulation variables were assessed before and after infusion of the colloid solution using thrombelastography. RESULTS: Data from 49 patients, 25 patients in the HES 130/0.4 and 24 in the HES 130/0.42 group, were analyzed. Measurements of reaction time, kinetic time, α-angle, maximum amplitude and coagulation index before and after colloid infusion did not differ between the groups. Within each group, after colloid infusion, reaction time did not change significantly, while α-angle, maximum amplitude and coagulation index values were significantly decreased (P<0.01, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively in HES 130/0.4 group and P<0.01, P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively in HES 130/0.42 group). Kinetic time was significantly increased (P<0.001) in both the groups. In both groups, all thrombelastographic measurements after colloid infusion were found within normal limits. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: HES 130/0.4 and HES 130/0.42 showed similar, not clinically significant effects on coagulation, as assessed by thrombelastography, when a dose of 30 ml/kg was administered in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3510891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35108912012-12-05 The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery Staikou, Chryssoula Paraskeva, Anteia Fassoulaki, Argyro Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) 130/0.4 (Voluven®) and 130/0.42 (Venofundin®) impair coagulation less than older HES solutions with higher molecular weight and molar substitution. Thus, these may be used in high doses up to 50 ml/kg/day. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of HES 130/0.4 versus HES 130/0.42 on coagulation after the intraoperative infusion of 30 ml/kg in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Fifty two patients scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery were randomized to receive 30 ml/kg of HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42 intraoperatively. Coagulation variables were assessed before and after infusion of the colloid solution using thrombelastography. RESULTS: Data from 49 patients, 25 patients in the HES 130/0.4 and 24 in the HES 130/0.42 group, were analyzed. Measurements of reaction time, kinetic time, α-angle, maximum amplitude and coagulation index before and after colloid infusion did not differ between the groups. Within each group, after colloid infusion, reaction time did not change significantly, while α-angle, maximum amplitude and coagulation index values were significantly decreased (P<0.01, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively in HES 130/0.4 group and P<0.01, P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively in HES 130/0.42 group). Kinetic time was significantly increased (P<0.001) in both the groups. In both groups, all thrombelastographic measurements after colloid infusion were found within normal limits. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: HES 130/0.4 and HES 130/0.42 showed similar, not clinically significant effects on coagulation, as assessed by thrombelastography, when a dose of 30 ml/kg was administered in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3510891/ /pubmed/23041738 Text en Copyright: © The Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Staikou, Chryssoula
Paraskeva, Anteia
Fassoulaki, Argyro
The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title_full The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title_fullStr The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title_full_unstemmed The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title_short The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
title_sort impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23041738
work_keys_str_mv AT staikouchryssoula theimpactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery
AT paraskevaanteia theimpactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery
AT fassoulakiargyro theimpactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery
AT staikouchryssoula impactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery
AT paraskevaanteia impactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery
AT fassoulakiargyro impactof30mlkghydroxyethylstarch13004vshydroxyethylstarch130042oncoagulationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgery