Cargando…

Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys

BACKGROUND: Infertility is a significant disability, yet there are no reliable estimates of its global prevalence. Studies on infertility prevalence define the condition inconsistently, rendering the comparison of studies or quantitative summaries of the literature difficult. This study analyzed key...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mascarenhas, Maya N, Cheung, Hoiwan, Mathers, Colin D, Stevens, Gretchen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-17
_version_ 1782251566301970432
author Mascarenhas, Maya N
Cheung, Hoiwan
Mathers, Colin D
Stevens, Gretchen A
author_facet Mascarenhas, Maya N
Cheung, Hoiwan
Mathers, Colin D
Stevens, Gretchen A
author_sort Mascarenhas, Maya N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infertility is a significant disability, yet there are no reliable estimates of its global prevalence. Studies on infertility prevalence define the condition inconsistently, rendering the comparison of studies or quantitative summaries of the literature difficult. This study analyzed key components of infertility to develop a definition that can be consistently applied to globally available household survey data. METHODS: We proposed a standard definition of infertility and used it to generate prevalence estimates using 53 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). The analysis was restricted to the subset of DHS that contained detailed fertility information collected through the reproductive health calendar. We performed sensitivity analyses for key components of the definition and used these to inform our recommendations for each element of the definition. RESULTS: Exposure type (couple status, contraceptive use, and intent), exposure time, and outcomes were key elements of the definition that we proposed. Our definition produced estimates that ranged from 0.6% to 3.4% for primary infertility and 8.7% to 32.6% for secondary infertility. Our sensitivity analyses showed that using an exposure measure of five years is less likely to misclassify fertile unions as infertile. Additionally, using a current, rather than continuous, measure of contraceptive use over five years resulted in a median relative error in secondary infertility of 20.7% (interquartile range of relative error [IQR]: 12.6%-26.9%), while not incorporating intent produced a corresponding error in secondary infertility of 58.2% (IQR: 44.3%-67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In order to estimate the global burden of infertility, prevalence estimates using a consistent definition need to be generated. Our analysis provided a recommended definition that could be applied to widely available global household data. We also summarized potential biases that should be considered when making estimates of infertility prevalence using household survey data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3511253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35112532012-12-01 Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys Mascarenhas, Maya N Cheung, Hoiwan Mathers, Colin D Stevens, Gretchen A Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Infertility is a significant disability, yet there are no reliable estimates of its global prevalence. Studies on infertility prevalence define the condition inconsistently, rendering the comparison of studies or quantitative summaries of the literature difficult. This study analyzed key components of infertility to develop a definition that can be consistently applied to globally available household survey data. METHODS: We proposed a standard definition of infertility and used it to generate prevalence estimates using 53 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). The analysis was restricted to the subset of DHS that contained detailed fertility information collected through the reproductive health calendar. We performed sensitivity analyses for key components of the definition and used these to inform our recommendations for each element of the definition. RESULTS: Exposure type (couple status, contraceptive use, and intent), exposure time, and outcomes were key elements of the definition that we proposed. Our definition produced estimates that ranged from 0.6% to 3.4% for primary infertility and 8.7% to 32.6% for secondary infertility. Our sensitivity analyses showed that using an exposure measure of five years is less likely to misclassify fertile unions as infertile. Additionally, using a current, rather than continuous, measure of contraceptive use over five years resulted in a median relative error in secondary infertility of 20.7% (interquartile range of relative error [IQR]: 12.6%-26.9%), while not incorporating intent produced a corresponding error in secondary infertility of 58.2% (IQR: 44.3%-67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In order to estimate the global burden of infertility, prevalence estimates using a consistent definition need to be generated. Our analysis provided a recommended definition that could be applied to widely available global household data. We also summarized potential biases that should be considered when making estimates of infertility prevalence using household survey data. BioMed Central 2012-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3511253/ /pubmed/22938182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-17 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mascarenhas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mascarenhas, Maya N
Cheung, Hoiwan
Mathers, Colin D
Stevens, Gretchen A
Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title_full Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title_fullStr Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title_full_unstemmed Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title_short Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
title_sort measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-17
work_keys_str_mv AT mascarenhasmayan measuringinfertilityinpopulationsconstructingastandarddefinitionforusewithdemographicandreproductivehealthsurveys
AT cheunghoiwan measuringinfertilityinpopulationsconstructingastandarddefinitionforusewithdemographicandreproductivehealthsurveys
AT matherscolind measuringinfertilityinpopulationsconstructingastandarddefinitionforusewithdemographicandreproductivehealthsurveys
AT stevensgretchena measuringinfertilityinpopulationsconstructingastandarddefinitionforusewithdemographicandreproductivehealthsurveys