Cargando…

No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of combined therapies of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) remains controversial in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy and safety of adding cetuximab or pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Si-wei, Huang, Yuan-yuan, Wei, Ying, Jiang, Zhi-min, Zhang, Yuan-dong, Yang, Qiong, Xie, De-rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050925
_version_ 1782251600022077440
author Zhou, Si-wei
Huang, Yuan-yuan
Wei, Ying
Jiang, Zhi-min
Zhang, Yuan-dong
Yang, Qiong
Xie, De-rong
author_facet Zhou, Si-wei
Huang, Yuan-yuan
Wei, Ying
Jiang, Zhi-min
Zhang, Yuan-dong
Yang, Qiong
Xie, De-rong
author_sort Zhou, Si-wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of combined therapies of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) remains controversial in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy and safety of adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first line treatment in KRAS wild type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with or without anti-EGFR drugs (cetuximab or panitumumab) in untreated KRAS wild type patients with mCRC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratio (RR) were used for the meta-analysis and were expressed with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four RCTs with 1270 patients, and all of the patients were administered oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens with or without anti-EGFR MAbs. The result of heterogeneity of OS was not significant. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the addition of cetuximab or panitumumab didn’t result in significant improvement in OS (HR = 1.00, 95%CI [0.88, 1.13], P = 0.95) or PFS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.71, 1.04], P = 0.13). The subgroup analysis of cetuximab also revealed no significant benefit in OS (HR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.89, 1.18], P = 0.75) or in PFS (HR = 0.87, 95%CI [0.65, 1.17], P = 0.36). Patients who received combined therapy didn’t have a higher ORR (Risk Ratio = 1.08, 95%CI [0.86, 1.36]). Toxicities slightly increased in anti-EGFR drugs group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of mCRC in wild type KRAS population did not improve efficacy in survival benefit and response rate. More RCTs are warranted to evaluate the combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3511401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35114012012-12-05 No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis Zhou, Si-wei Huang, Yuan-yuan Wei, Ying Jiang, Zhi-min Zhang, Yuan-dong Yang, Qiong Xie, De-rong PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of combined therapies of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) remains controversial in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy and safety of adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first line treatment in KRAS wild type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with or without anti-EGFR drugs (cetuximab or panitumumab) in untreated KRAS wild type patients with mCRC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratio (RR) were used for the meta-analysis and were expressed with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four RCTs with 1270 patients, and all of the patients were administered oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens with or without anti-EGFR MAbs. The result of heterogeneity of OS was not significant. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the addition of cetuximab or panitumumab didn’t result in significant improvement in OS (HR = 1.00, 95%CI [0.88, 1.13], P = 0.95) or PFS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.71, 1.04], P = 0.13). The subgroup analysis of cetuximab also revealed no significant benefit in OS (HR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.89, 1.18], P = 0.75) or in PFS (HR = 0.87, 95%CI [0.65, 1.17], P = 0.36). Patients who received combined therapy didn’t have a higher ORR (Risk Ratio = 1.08, 95%CI [0.86, 1.36]). Toxicities slightly increased in anti-EGFR drugs group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of mCRC in wild type KRAS population did not improve efficacy in survival benefit and response rate. More RCTs are warranted to evaluate the combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Public Library of Science 2012-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3511401/ /pubmed/23226426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050925 Text en © 2012 Zhou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Si-wei
Huang, Yuan-yuan
Wei, Ying
Jiang, Zhi-min
Zhang, Yuan-dong
Yang, Qiong
Xie, De-rong
No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_short No Survival Benefit from Adding Cetuximab or Panitumumab to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in KRAS Wild Type Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort no survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in kras wild type patients: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050925
work_keys_str_mv AT zhousiwei nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT huangyuanyuan nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT weiying nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT jiangzhimin nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT zhangyuandong nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT yangqiong nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis
AT xiederong nosurvivalbenefitfromaddingcetuximaborpanitumumabtooxaliplatinbasedchemotherapyinthefirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalcancerinkraswildtypepatientsametaanalysis