Cargando…
Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies
Genotype imputation, used in genome-wide association studies to expand coverage of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has performed poorly in African Americans compared to less admixed populations. Overall, imputation has typically relied on HapMap reference haplotype panels from Africans (YRI)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050610 |
_version_ | 1782251634084020224 |
---|---|
author | Hancock, Dana B. Levy, Joshua L. Gaddis, Nathan C. Bierut, Laura J. Saccone, Nancy L. Page, Grier P. Johnson, Eric O. |
author_facet | Hancock, Dana B. Levy, Joshua L. Gaddis, Nathan C. Bierut, Laura J. Saccone, Nancy L. Page, Grier P. Johnson, Eric O. |
author_sort | Hancock, Dana B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genotype imputation, used in genome-wide association studies to expand coverage of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has performed poorly in African Americans compared to less admixed populations. Overall, imputation has typically relied on HapMap reference haplotype panels from Africans (YRI), European Americans (CEU), and Asians (CHB/JPT). The 1000 Genomes project offers a wider range of reference populations, such as African Americans (ASW), but their imputation performance has had limited evaluation. Using 595 African Americans genotyped on Illumina’s HumanHap550v3 BeadChip, we compared imputation results from four software programs (IMPUTE2, BEAGLE, MaCH, and MaCH-Admix) and three reference panels consisting of different combinations of 1000 Genomes populations (February 2012 release): (1) 3 specifically selected populations (YRI, CEU, and ASW); (2) 8 populations of diverse African (AFR) or European (AFR) descent; and (3) all 14 available populations (ALL). Based on chromosome 22, we calculated three performance metrics: (1) concordance (percentage of masked genotyped SNPs with imputed and true genotype agreement); (2) imputation quality score (IQS; concordance adjusted for chance agreement, which is particularly informative for low minor allele frequency [MAF] SNPs); and (3) average r2hat (estimated correlation between the imputed and true genotypes, for all imputed SNPs). Across the reference panels, IMPUTE2 and MaCH had the highest concordance (91%–93%), but IMPUTE2 had the highest IQS (81%–83%) and average r2hat (0.68 using YRI+ASW+CEU, 0.62 using AFR+EUR, and 0.55 using ALL). Imputation quality for most programs was reduced by the addition of more distantly related reference populations, due entirely to the introduction of low frequency SNPs (MAF≤2%) that are monomorphic in the more closely related panels. While imputation was optimized by using IMPUTE2 with reference to the ALL panel (average r2hat = 0.86 for SNPs with MAF>2%), use of the ALL panel for African American studies requires careful interpretation of the population specificity and imputation quality of low frequency SNPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3511547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35115472012-12-05 Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies Hancock, Dana B. Levy, Joshua L. Gaddis, Nathan C. Bierut, Laura J. Saccone, Nancy L. Page, Grier P. Johnson, Eric O. PLoS One Research Article Genotype imputation, used in genome-wide association studies to expand coverage of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has performed poorly in African Americans compared to less admixed populations. Overall, imputation has typically relied on HapMap reference haplotype panels from Africans (YRI), European Americans (CEU), and Asians (CHB/JPT). The 1000 Genomes project offers a wider range of reference populations, such as African Americans (ASW), but their imputation performance has had limited evaluation. Using 595 African Americans genotyped on Illumina’s HumanHap550v3 BeadChip, we compared imputation results from four software programs (IMPUTE2, BEAGLE, MaCH, and MaCH-Admix) and three reference panels consisting of different combinations of 1000 Genomes populations (February 2012 release): (1) 3 specifically selected populations (YRI, CEU, and ASW); (2) 8 populations of diverse African (AFR) or European (AFR) descent; and (3) all 14 available populations (ALL). Based on chromosome 22, we calculated three performance metrics: (1) concordance (percentage of masked genotyped SNPs with imputed and true genotype agreement); (2) imputation quality score (IQS; concordance adjusted for chance agreement, which is particularly informative for low minor allele frequency [MAF] SNPs); and (3) average r2hat (estimated correlation between the imputed and true genotypes, for all imputed SNPs). Across the reference panels, IMPUTE2 and MaCH had the highest concordance (91%–93%), but IMPUTE2 had the highest IQS (81%–83%) and average r2hat (0.68 using YRI+ASW+CEU, 0.62 using AFR+EUR, and 0.55 using ALL). Imputation quality for most programs was reduced by the addition of more distantly related reference populations, due entirely to the introduction of low frequency SNPs (MAF≤2%) that are monomorphic in the more closely related panels. While imputation was optimized by using IMPUTE2 with reference to the ALL panel (average r2hat = 0.86 for SNPs with MAF>2%), use of the ALL panel for African American studies requires careful interpretation of the population specificity and imputation quality of low frequency SNPs. Public Library of Science 2012-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3511547/ /pubmed/23226329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050610 Text en © 2012 Hancock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hancock, Dana B. Levy, Joshua L. Gaddis, Nathan C. Bierut, Laura J. Saccone, Nancy L. Page, Grier P. Johnson, Eric O. Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title | Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title_full | Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title_short | Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance Using 1000 Genomes in African American Studies |
title_sort | assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 genomes in african american studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hancockdanab assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT levyjoshual assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT gaddisnathanc assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT bierutlauraj assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT sacconenancyl assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT pagegrierp assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies AT johnsonerico assessmentofgenotypeimputationperformanceusing1000genomesinafricanamericanstudies |