Cargando…

A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow

BACKGROUND: In the administration of minimal flow anesthesia, traditionally a fixed time period of high flow has been used before changing over to minimal flow. However, newer studies have used “equilibration time” of a volatile anesthetic agent as the change-over point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallik, Tanuja, Aneja, S, Tope, R, Muralidhar, V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23225926
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.101916
_version_ 1782251669201879040
author Mallik, Tanuja
Aneja, S
Tope, R
Muralidhar, V
author_facet Mallik, Tanuja
Aneja, S
Tope, R
Muralidhar, V
author_sort Mallik, Tanuja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the administration of minimal flow anesthesia, traditionally a fixed time period of high flow has been used before changing over to minimal flow. However, newer studies have used “equilibration time” of a volatile anesthetic agent as the change-over point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted on 60 patients, who were divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Two volatile inhalational anesthetic agents were compared. Group I received desflurane (n = 30) and group II isoflurane (n = 30). Both the groups received an initial high flow till equilibration between inspired (Fi) and expired (Fe) agent concentration were achieved, which was defined as Fe/Fi = 0.8. The mean (SD) equilibration time was obtained for both the agent. Then, a drift in end-tidal agent concentration during the minimal flow anesthesia and recovery profile was noted. RESULTS: The mean equilibration time obtained for desflurane and isoflurane were 4.96 ± 1.60 and 16.96 ± 9.64 min (P < 0.001). The drift in end-tidal agent concentration over time was minimal in the desflurane group (P = 0.065). Recovery time was 5.70 ± 2.78 min in the desflurane group and 8.06 ± 31 min in the isoflurane group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Use of equilibration time of the volatile anesthetic agent as a change-over point, from high flow to minimal flow, can help us use minimal flow anesthesia, in a more efficient way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3511943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35119432012-12-05 A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow Mallik, Tanuja Aneja, S Tope, R Muralidhar, V J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: In the administration of minimal flow anesthesia, traditionally a fixed time period of high flow has been used before changing over to minimal flow. However, newer studies have used “equilibration time” of a volatile anesthetic agent as the change-over point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted on 60 patients, who were divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Two volatile inhalational anesthetic agents were compared. Group I received desflurane (n = 30) and group II isoflurane (n = 30). Both the groups received an initial high flow till equilibration between inspired (Fi) and expired (Fe) agent concentration were achieved, which was defined as Fe/Fi = 0.8. The mean (SD) equilibration time was obtained for both the agent. Then, a drift in end-tidal agent concentration during the minimal flow anesthesia and recovery profile was noted. RESULTS: The mean equilibration time obtained for desflurane and isoflurane were 4.96 ± 1.60 and 16.96 ± 9.64 min (P < 0.001). The drift in end-tidal agent concentration over time was minimal in the desflurane group (P = 0.065). Recovery time was 5.70 ± 2.78 min in the desflurane group and 8.06 ± 31 min in the isoflurane group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Use of equilibration time of the volatile anesthetic agent as a change-over point, from high flow to minimal flow, can help us use minimal flow anesthesia, in a more efficient way. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3511943/ /pubmed/23225926 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.101916 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mallik, Tanuja
Aneja, S
Tope, R
Muralidhar, V
A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title_full A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title_fullStr A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title_full_unstemmed A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title_short A randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
title_sort randomized prospective study of desflurane versus isoflurane in minimal flow anesthesia using “equilibration time” as the change-over point to minimal flow
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23225926
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.101916
work_keys_str_mv AT malliktanuja arandomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT anejas arandomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT toper arandomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT muralidharv arandomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT malliktanuja randomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT anejas randomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT toper randomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow
AT muralidharv randomizedprospectivestudyofdesfluraneversusisofluraneinminimalflowanesthesiausingequilibrationtimeasthechangeoverpointtominimalflow