Cargando…
Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016 |
_version_ | 1782251681028767744 |
---|---|
author | Marbach, Daniel Costello, James C. Küffner, Robert Vega, Nicci Prill, Robert J. Camacho, Diogo M. Allison, Kyle R. Kellis, Manolis Collins, James J. Stolovitzky, Gustavo |
author_facet | Marbach, Daniel Costello, James C. Küffner, Robert Vega, Nicci Prill, Robert J. Camacho, Diogo M. Allison, Kyle R. Kellis, Manolis Collins, James J. Stolovitzky, Gustavo |
author_sort | Marbach, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and in silico microarray data. We characterize performance, data requirements, and inherent biases of different inference approaches offering guidelines for both algorithm application and development. We observe that no single inference method performs optimally across all datasets. In contrast, integration of predictions from multiple inference methods shows robust and high performance across diverse datasets. Thereby, we construct high-confidence networks for E. coli and S. aureus, each comprising ~1700 transcriptional interactions at an estimated precision of 50%. We experimentally test 53 novel interactions in E. coli, of which 23 were supported (43%). Our results establish community-based methods as a powerful and robust tool for the inference of transcriptional gene regulatory networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3512113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35121132013-02-01 Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference Marbach, Daniel Costello, James C. Küffner, Robert Vega, Nicci Prill, Robert J. Camacho, Diogo M. Allison, Kyle R. Kellis, Manolis Collins, James J. Stolovitzky, Gustavo Nat Methods Article Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and in silico microarray data. We characterize performance, data requirements, and inherent biases of different inference approaches offering guidelines for both algorithm application and development. We observe that no single inference method performs optimally across all datasets. In contrast, integration of predictions from multiple inference methods shows robust and high performance across diverse datasets. Thereby, we construct high-confidence networks for E. coli and S. aureus, each comprising ~1700 transcriptional interactions at an estimated precision of 50%. We experimentally test 53 novel interactions in E. coli, of which 23 were supported (43%). Our results establish community-based methods as a powerful and robust tool for the inference of transcriptional gene regulatory networks. 2012-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3512113/ /pubmed/22796662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Marbach, Daniel Costello, James C. Küffner, Robert Vega, Nicci Prill, Robert J. Camacho, Diogo M. Allison, Kyle R. Kellis, Manolis Collins, James J. Stolovitzky, Gustavo Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title | Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title_full | Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title_fullStr | Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title_full_unstemmed | Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title_short | Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
title_sort | wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marbachdaniel wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT costellojamesc wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT kuffnerrobert wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT veganicci wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT prillrobertj wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT camachodiogom wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT allisonkyler wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT kellismanolis wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT collinsjamesj wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference AT stolovitzkygustavo wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference |