Cargando…

Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference

Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marbach, Daniel, Costello, James C., Küffner, Robert, Vega, Nicci, Prill, Robert J., Camacho, Diogo M., Allison, Kyle R., Kellis, Manolis, Collins, James J., Stolovitzky, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016
_version_ 1782251681028767744
author Marbach, Daniel
Costello, James C.
Küffner, Robert
Vega, Nicci
Prill, Robert J.
Camacho, Diogo M.
Allison, Kyle R.
Kellis, Manolis
Collins, James J.
Stolovitzky, Gustavo
author_facet Marbach, Daniel
Costello, James C.
Küffner, Robert
Vega, Nicci
Prill, Robert J.
Camacho, Diogo M.
Allison, Kyle R.
Kellis, Manolis
Collins, James J.
Stolovitzky, Gustavo
author_sort Marbach, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and in silico microarray data. We characterize performance, data requirements, and inherent biases of different inference approaches offering guidelines for both algorithm application and development. We observe that no single inference method performs optimally across all datasets. In contrast, integration of predictions from multiple inference methods shows robust and high performance across diverse datasets. Thereby, we construct high-confidence networks for E. coli and S. aureus, each comprising ~1700 transcriptional interactions at an estimated precision of 50%. We experimentally test 53 novel interactions in E. coli, of which 23 were supported (43%). Our results establish community-based methods as a powerful and robust tool for the inference of transcriptional gene regulatory networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35121132013-02-01 Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference Marbach, Daniel Costello, James C. Küffner, Robert Vega, Nicci Prill, Robert J. Camacho, Diogo M. Allison, Kyle R. Kellis, Manolis Collins, James J. Stolovitzky, Gustavo Nat Methods Article Reconstructing gene regulatory networks from high-throughput data is a long-standing problem. Through the DREAM project (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods), we performed a comprehensive blind assessment of over thirty network inference methods on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and in silico microarray data. We characterize performance, data requirements, and inherent biases of different inference approaches offering guidelines for both algorithm application and development. We observe that no single inference method performs optimally across all datasets. In contrast, integration of predictions from multiple inference methods shows robust and high performance across diverse datasets. Thereby, we construct high-confidence networks for E. coli and S. aureus, each comprising ~1700 transcriptional interactions at an estimated precision of 50%. We experimentally test 53 novel interactions in E. coli, of which 23 were supported (43%). Our results establish community-based methods as a powerful and robust tool for the inference of transcriptional gene regulatory networks. 2012-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3512113/ /pubmed/22796662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Marbach, Daniel
Costello, James C.
Küffner, Robert
Vega, Nicci
Prill, Robert J.
Camacho, Diogo M.
Allison, Kyle R.
Kellis, Manolis
Collins, James J.
Stolovitzky, Gustavo
Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title_full Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title_fullStr Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title_full_unstemmed Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title_short Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
title_sort wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT marbachdaniel wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT costellojamesc wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT kuffnerrobert wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT veganicci wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT prillrobertj wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT camachodiogom wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT allisonkyler wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT kellismanolis wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT collinsjamesj wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference
AT stolovitzkygustavo wisdomofcrowdsforrobustgenenetworkinference