Cargando…

Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study

It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Michael, Röhrle, Oliver, Haeufle, Daniel F. B., Schmitt, Syn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630
_version_ 1782251700392820736
author Günther, Michael
Röhrle, Oliver
Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmitt, Syn
author_facet Günther, Michael
Röhrle, Oliver
Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmitt, Syn
author_sort Günther, Michael
collection PubMed
description It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also neglect muscle internal inertia. Assuming that such first-order contraction dynamics yet interacts with muscle internal mass distribution, this study investigates two questions: (i) what is the time scale on which the muscle responds to a force step? (ii) How does this response scale with muscle design parameters? Thereto, we simulated accelerated contractions of alternating sequences of Hill-type contractile elements and point masses. We found that in a typical small muscle the force levels off after about 0.2 ms, contraction velocity after about 0.5 ms. In an upscaled version representing bigger mammals' muscles, the force levels off after about 20 ms, and the theoretically expected maximum contraction velocity is not reached. We conclude (i) that it may be indispensable to introduce second-order contributions into muscle models to understand high-frequency muscle responses, particularly in bigger muscles. Additionally, (ii) constructing more elaborate measuring devices seems to be worthwhile to distinguish viscoelastic and inertia properties in rapid contractile responses of muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35122962012-12-07 Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study Günther, Michael Röhrle, Oliver Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmitt, Syn Comput Math Methods Med Research Article It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also neglect muscle internal inertia. Assuming that such first-order contraction dynamics yet interacts with muscle internal mass distribution, this study investigates two questions: (i) what is the time scale on which the muscle responds to a force step? (ii) How does this response scale with muscle design parameters? Thereto, we simulated accelerated contractions of alternating sequences of Hill-type contractile elements and point masses. We found that in a typical small muscle the force levels off after about 0.2 ms, contraction velocity after about 0.5 ms. In an upscaled version representing bigger mammals' muscles, the force levels off after about 20 ms, and the theoretically expected maximum contraction velocity is not reached. We conclude (i) that it may be indispensable to introduce second-order contributions into muscle models to understand high-frequency muscle responses, particularly in bigger muscles. Additionally, (ii) constructing more elaborate measuring devices seems to be worthwhile to distinguish viscoelastic and inertia properties in rapid contractile responses of muscles. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3512296/ /pubmed/23227110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630 Text en Copyright © 2012 Michael Günther et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Günther, Michael
Röhrle, Oliver
Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmitt, Syn
Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title_full Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title_fullStr Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title_short Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
title_sort spreading out muscle mass within a hill-type model: a computer simulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630
work_keys_str_mv AT gunthermichael spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy
AT rohrleoliver spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy
AT haeufledanielfb spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy
AT schmittsyn spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy