Cargando…
Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study
It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630 |
_version_ | 1782251700392820736 |
---|---|
author | Günther, Michael Röhrle, Oliver Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmitt, Syn |
author_facet | Günther, Michael Röhrle, Oliver Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmitt, Syn |
author_sort | Günther, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also neglect muscle internal inertia. Assuming that such first-order contraction dynamics yet interacts with muscle internal mass distribution, this study investigates two questions: (i) what is the time scale on which the muscle responds to a force step? (ii) How does this response scale with muscle design parameters? Thereto, we simulated accelerated contractions of alternating sequences of Hill-type contractile elements and point masses. We found that in a typical small muscle the force levels off after about 0.2 ms, contraction velocity after about 0.5 ms. In an upscaled version representing bigger mammals' muscles, the force levels off after about 20 ms, and the theoretically expected maximum contraction velocity is not reached. We conclude (i) that it may be indispensable to introduce second-order contributions into muscle models to understand high-frequency muscle responses, particularly in bigger muscles. Additionally, (ii) constructing more elaborate measuring devices seems to be worthwhile to distinguish viscoelastic and inertia properties in rapid contractile responses of muscles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3512296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35122962012-12-07 Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study Günther, Michael Röhrle, Oliver Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmitt, Syn Comput Math Methods Med Research Article It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also neglect muscle internal inertia. Assuming that such first-order contraction dynamics yet interacts with muscle internal mass distribution, this study investigates two questions: (i) what is the time scale on which the muscle responds to a force step? (ii) How does this response scale with muscle design parameters? Thereto, we simulated accelerated contractions of alternating sequences of Hill-type contractile elements and point masses. We found that in a typical small muscle the force levels off after about 0.2 ms, contraction velocity after about 0.5 ms. In an upscaled version representing bigger mammals' muscles, the force levels off after about 20 ms, and the theoretically expected maximum contraction velocity is not reached. We conclude (i) that it may be indispensable to introduce second-order contributions into muscle models to understand high-frequency muscle responses, particularly in bigger muscles. Additionally, (ii) constructing more elaborate measuring devices seems to be worthwhile to distinguish viscoelastic and inertia properties in rapid contractile responses of muscles. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3512296/ /pubmed/23227110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630 Text en Copyright © 2012 Michael Günther et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Günther, Michael Röhrle, Oliver Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmitt, Syn Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title | Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title_full | Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title_fullStr | Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title_short | Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study |
title_sort | spreading out muscle mass within a hill-type model: a computer simulation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/848630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunthermichael spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy AT rohrleoliver spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy AT haeufledanielfb spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy AT schmittsyn spreadingoutmusclemasswithinahilltypemodelacomputersimulationstudy |